Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I would highly expect that you would have to try and engineer it, however you'll be knocked back. Bonnet behaviour is integral in an frontal accident, no way any engineer will allow it becuase of changed crumple characteristics, etc etc

Marcus, close but the issue is pedestrian accidents. CF not properly laid up with a layer of Kevlar will shatter and split in razor sharp shards, where the kevlar will hold it and make it fail more like aluminium, being more friendly to pedestrians. If you are thinking of having a CF bonnet consider the long term costs of paying fo medical care if you hit a pedestrian and injure them. State 3rd party may not cover it, or they may come after you for recompense.

Can Carbon Fibre Bonnets be engineered?,  i know just cars won't insure, but just curious about their legalities etc and if there are ways around them.

cf bonnets look crap anyway, dont like the way the bonnet is black and the rest of the car is a different colour, looks crap imo

Marcus, close but the issue is pedestrian accidents. CF not properly laid up with a layer of Kevlar will shatter and split in razor sharp shards, where the kevlar will hold it and make it fail more like aluminium, being more friendly to pedestrians. If you are thinking of having a CF bonnet consider the long term costs of paying fo medical care if you hit a pedestrian and injure them. State 3rd party may not cover it, or they may come after you for recompense.

that was my etc etc :D

nah i really should have thought of that too :D

PS I note that we are now "GTR ENABLED" congrats you deserve it :(

Fiberglass will be thicker and are usually chopped strand mat, therefore they will break up in a different way to CF or CF over fiberglass. You have to see the way CF shards, even off fiberglass, to really get a handle on it but from experience (not in an accident) it is sharp and can be painful. With the Kevlar layer in the CF layup it becomes part of the structure and changes it significantly. Kevlar is a titanium or tungsten thread coated with another product (can't remember) then made into mat.

Marcus, thanks for that. I'm happy especially when I saw the $12K in receipts for the engine from Racepace and Argo. WooHoo. Check the for sale thread for more info..

Thanks for all the replies guys, i was wanting to get one mainly because i liked the look of one particular design, but if it can't be engineered or made legal, i don't wanna know about it hehe, perhaps i'll look further into modifying my stock bonnet with a scoop/airflow type setup, i heard somewhere that these aren't illegal, correct me if i'm wrong.

If you want to ensure that any modification you are thinking about doing is legal or not speak to an engineer 1st before doing the mod. I tend to agree that carbon bonnets would be illegal due to the change in the crumple effect, we all know about pedestrian saftey, a shard of carbon could literally slice you in half at speed.

I know that some fibreglass/metal reinforced 4wd bonnets are RTA approved like FJ40's but I again say speak to an engineer 1st then get him to sign off on it if the mod you are doing is legal.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...