Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

July 11 :O

http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.js...storyid=3244811

People's victory

By SIMON BENSON State Political Reporter

June 7, 2005

THE motorists of NSW have scored a stunning people's victory, with tough new P-plate laws to stop the carnage caused by young drivers.

Probationary drivers will be banned from driving high-powered cars and face restrictions on carrying passengers if they break the law. It follows a 10-month campaign – led by The Daily Telegraph – in which the families of youngsters killed and maimed on our roads pleaded for change.

No P1 or P2 driver will be able to drive high-powered vehicles – unless for work or exceptional circumstances.

P-plate drivers who have their licence suspended will not be allowed to carry more than one passenger for a period of 12 months.

Parents of some of the 24 young people who died in P-plate crashes since the campaign began said last night the laws were a victory for the people.

The regulations answer two of three things The Daily Telegraph readers asked for after 20-year-old Tim Hopkinson died in September 2004.

Roads Minister Michael Costa will today announce that from July 11:

P1 and P2 licence holders will be banned from driving turbo-charged, super-charged vehicles (diesel vehicles excepted), eight-cylinder vehicles and those with engine performance modifications. Exemptions will apply where powerful vehicles are required for genuine employment purposes, and where eight-cylinder 4WD vehicles are required by rural drivers;

A LIMIT of one passenger for 12 months will apply for P1 and P2 drivers who lose their licence because of a serious driving offence. The passenger restriction will apply when the licence is reissued;

NEW P-plate positioning, which also shows a driver's allowable speed limit and any restrictions, on licences;

CHANGES will not apply to current P-plate licence holders unless they are disqualified for an offence after July 11; and

A VEHICLE guide will be posted on the RTA website outlining the new rules.

The Daily Telegraph understands that other measures are expected to go before Cabinet for approval later in the year.

These will include higher standards for driver training – the third component of The Daily Telegraph campaign.

The laws would be reviewed by the Roads and Traffic Authority within 12 months.

"A 17-year-old driver with a P1 licence is about four times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than a driver aged 26 or older," Mr Costa said.

"Each one of those fatalities represents a tragedy not only for the victims, but for their families and communities."  

The new laws come from the NSW Government's Young Driver Discussion Paper, released last November, and a Road Users Summit in March.

The Daily Telegraph's delegate to that summit Rebecca Stanford – herself a P-plate accident victim – welcomed the reforms.

similar to the rules already in place in melb...

except the distinction is not "turbocharged, supercharged, or v8", its a power-to-weight ratio of 125 kW/tonne based on the car's stock figures...

i think its good to have some sort of regulation, but where do you draw a line?

OK what i wanna know is, what if i purchase my car from say japan in the next two weeks.. The car doesnt arrive till say a week after these rules have been enforced.. Can i not drive this car?? Or can i still gain some approval due to purchasin a car b4 these rules..

Any dealers or personal import ppl on here.. pls let me know asap.. All blitz?? what u reckon. CSV imports?? i dunno. anyone else who imports cars..

SO does it mean, i have to get my car registered by 2nd??

PLEASE TELL ME someone. stressed like hell now..

Sidd.

Damn that's harsh.

By the sound of things, its game over for NSW P Platers.

You might want to find out where the daily telegraph head office is ;).

I hope Mr.Bracks and Co don't follow suit!

Thankfully the daily telegraph/government are idiots...

Toyota MR2, Honda S2000, DC2 Integra Type R, Nissan R34 GT Skyline... just a few N/A cars that really get up and go - maybe not *as* quick as a turbo, but they handle just as well and are all well balanced cars... and easily capable of getting to lethal speeds (when combined with a telegraph pole)

I've been studying road safety all semester at Uni - with the focus being the latest scheme, the "national road safety strategy 2001-2010" - and from all that study, i realise the government and RTA are just idiots and are applying band-aid solutions!

Ah well *hugs his N/A prelude with 147kW* ;)

I think the idea of "x type of engine" is silly. Power to weight ratio would work better.

From a governments point of view (which I don't support btw) I think these rules would be more effective, because it instantly rules out cars that are considered dangerous.

I mean i've been pulled over stacks of times.....the power to weight ratio has never come up (I don't won't to jinx myself.) and I drive a 32 GTR on my Ps.

Whereas now in NSW, a turbo car will instantly be prohibited.

Although...I still think these new regulations are far-fetched and that Australia is the most over-regulated country in the world....

I think the idea of "x type of engine" is silly. Power to weight ratio would work better.

Siddr20,

RELAX DUDE! You got your P-plates before July 11 your alright.

cause Sydney is gay j/k and p plates must now suffer the consequences ;)

Lol yes i know i got my PS, but i dont have a turbod car.. i was going to import one, in a months time.. Hence, i heard i have to have the car registered by this new rules come out.. So that means, i would have to purchase a car, way b4 date n get it registered..

RTa doesnt know anything.. a friend rang up 2 ask. they didnt know..

i dont think RTA has anything to do with it.

Its a traffic issue/offense.

You can continue to own your high powered car, its just that the law will not allow you to drive it.

i reckon it generally means that u cant drive, dosent matter when u get ur car, its more a case of ...if u r on ur ps, u cant drive this sort of car.

Good luck dude, looks like u can start posting the car in the trading post

I think this is a load of BS and just a band aid solution like Menthu_Rae says.

This doesnt take into account the whole picture. I'll give two "examples":

1. A WRX has a turbocharged engine. It also has excellent brakes and pretty good handling. A standard commodore has neither(brakes might be ok, but not excellent). If the young drivers of both do happen to have a bit of a fang, I know which car I'd feel safer in.

2. Al gets his Ps one year before his mate Bob. Al drives his mums Mirage(nothing against mirages) to church every Sunday and occasianally elsewhere for an average of 20km a week. Al gets his licence so he can drive to work and averages over 500km a week. He also gets involved with a car club and participates in proffesionally supervised driving activities. Why can Al drive a powerful car 1 year before Bob? Because he doesnt have to wear a little piece of plastic on his car?

This is just a bandaid solution, but I know a real solution would be too hard too develop and implement, I'm just having a whinge.

Any car will do potentially fatal speeds, and a powerful car will only go as fast as you drive it/tell it to go.

I think they shouldnt ban P platers from driving powerful cars, they should just ban F@#$wits from driving completetly.

And no this will not affaect me or my soon to arrive GTR with 400hp as I already have my P's(nearly finished actually).

Hahhaah yea i was mis lead by this.. "No P1 or P2 driver will be able to drive high-powered vehicles – unless for work or exceptional circumstances"

heheh so i can buy my car in a months time then.. sweet..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...