Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've recently imported a 89 ceffy with a rb20det (previously a auto non turbo it appears). Have had timing belt changed along with a major service so far since its arrival.

Upon checking timing i aswel as the workshop have discovered that the idle timing is sitting at +30 degrees when the CAS is centered at where it normally should be at 15 degree. CAM belt has been double checked and is all aligned correctly and when put at top dead centre (i think thats what u call it) the harmonic balance also reads 15degrees where is should be.

even if we retard the timing the whole way it will not get to 15degrees.

so to double check that the timing was returning to normal upon load and acceleration we put it on the dyno, timing adjusted to normal as it accelerated/reved, no pinging was detected, power figure was at what it would be expected (116rwkw for completly stock car) , and was also running fairly rich.....

btw we have checked ecu and it is stock and not chipped from visual inspection. and was also tested with 2 different timing lights to varify that one wasn't broken.

does anyone have any ideas why its sitting at +30degrees at idle but as the revs increase returns to how it should be with no pinging or detonation what so ever???

i'm looking at swapping the ecu's with another rb20det soon, but other then ecu i'm kinda stumped and so is the workshop.

cheers

ben

so when you line the cams up on TDC the crank is reading 15 degrees.,.....are you serious??? if thats the case, you are waaaaaaaaaaaay out in your cam timing, when the crank is on TDC, so should the cams...

even with adj. cam gears, 1 tooth is 4 - 6 degrees.

to get the engine to run correctly, an absurd amount of ignition timing is required.

set the crank to TDC, it will have 5 marks in 5 degree increments, the TDC will be a different mark, it will be longer, or a different colour. then set the cams to TDC, and put the timing back to std.

i hope you havent done any damage to the engine.

cheers

Linton

I've recently imported a 89 ceffy with a rb20det (previously a auto non turbo it appears). Have had timing belt changed along with a major service so far since its arrival.  

Upon checking timing i aswel as the workshop have discovered that the idle timing is sitting at +40 degrees when the CAS is centered at where it normally should be at 15 degree. CAM belt has been double checked and is all aligned correctly and when put at top dead centre (i think thats what u call it) the harmonic balance also reads 15degrees where is should be.  

even if we retard the timing the whole way it will not get to 15degrees.  

so to double check that the timing was returning to normal upon load and acceleration we put it on the dyno, timing adjusted to normal as it accelerated/reved, no pinging was detected, power figure was at what it would be expected (116rwkw for completly stock car) , and was also running fairly rich.....

btw we have checked ecu and it is stock and not chipped from visual inspection. and was also tested with 2 different timing lights to varify that one wasn't broken.  

does anyone have any ideas why its sitting at +40degrees at idle but as the revs increase returns to how it should be with no pinging or detonation what so ever???

i'm looking at swapping the ecu's with another rb20det soon, but other then ecu i'm kinda stumped and so is the workshop.  

cheers

ben

Hi Ben, each mark on the crank pulley is 5 degrees.

RB26_Crank_Pulley_Orientation_at_TDC.jpg

:(

sorry my typo (too late at night when i posted this)... was actually 30 degrees not 40.

Cheers sydneykid, but yeah i know what each mark reads and it was deffinatly reading 30 degree's.

And topkart R33, yup that sensor was also dissconected. The guys at workshop took care of that while i was watchin. Plus set the idle at were it should be 650 from memory.

so when you line the cams up on TDC the crank is reading 15 degrees.,.....are you serious??? if thats the case, you are waaaaaaaaaaaay out in your cam timing, when the crank is on TDC, so should the cams...

even with adj. cam gears, 1 tooth is 4 - 6 degrees.

to get the engine to run correctly, an absurd amount of ignition timing is required.

set the crank to TDC, it will have 5 marks in 5 degree increments, the TDC will be a different mark, it will be longer, or a different colour. then set the cams to TDC, and put the timing back to std.

i hope you havent done any damage to the engine.

cheers

Linton

cheers for the help. although all this was checked. and when the crank was on TDC the cams also were. all those little markings were lined up and all. that was the first thing the workshop checked and also showed me so i'd could also believe it with my own eyes. thats why its so wierd. seems as thou CPU or something is stuffing round with the timing while at idle but soon as the revs increase timing all returns to normal.......if the timing cam timing was as far out as expected i'm sure the car would have trouble even starting/running and sure as hell would not pull a stock power figure. i really gotta get my hands on another CPU when i get the chance......

It might be worth having a good look at your harmonic balancer and see if the outer ring has slipped/moved.

yup valid point. i'll check this out.although doubtful, as the rubber on it looked fine under my quick observation last time i had a look

btw i've added the power curve for anyone to see. doesn't seem too odd to me.

also looking at the LAMBDA curve it seems like the air fuel ratio is healthy enough. running rich rather then lean.

Do you have the idle rpm correct when checking the timing, think its 15deg btdc @ 600rpm.

Also make sure the TPS is working correctly and registering that the motor is at idle/throttle closed, or else it may use an advanced timing value. (Bit like a limp mode)

I have a similar problem. Everything on my RB25 is set up correctly and the car runs ok but makes me nervous. The cams/crank line up perfectly and the CAS is centered which in the past has always been around 15btdc. My motor claims it's sitting at around 28 degrees or so at idle and doesn't ping at all. It feels like it needs a little more advance but I don't want to do it with it reading as high as it already is. I've tried various timing lights and one of them was a snap-on, all of them read the same.

The idle rpm is right, the tps is unplugged during the check, the engine is at normal temps, all marks line up, and I see 0 knock on the SAFC. I'm stumped, I can't find anything wrong with the engine or any of the sensors but that timing number has me concerned. My other RB never did this so this is a first for me. I'm glad someone else has a similar issue, I'd love to see the fix for this :cheers:

edit: Oh, all my timing checks have been on a high tension lead off the number 1 plug and not that stupid timing loop (which is 14 degrees off on my engine)

^ yup thats basically exactly what i have mabru but in a much better worded way, inc the method of checking the timing. and yup i'd have to agree with you. really makes me nervous to say the least even though everything else seems fine. for some reason i really think its the ECU, but gotta just find some spare time inbetween my exams to go swap ecu's with a mate of mine to see if there is a difference. but i also been thinking, could the knock sensor cause such problems if it is faulty?!? have you checked this on urs?, or better still, what so far have u checked and canceled out?

And duncan yup was checked with my timing light (cheaper one) first followed by the workshops better branded one which showed same results. So not sure on that one.

I have not, and I suspect that yes a bad knock sensor could cause this. My TPS seems fine, I've swapped the CAS so I'm pretty sure it's not to blame, I've checked almost every sensor and they all check fine. The only ones I've neglected to look at are the knock sensors, that would explain my loss of power, I'm not sure why the engine would think it's so far advanced when it isn't though.

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

I think I've nailed it. CAS nub was worn on the edges causing the timing to shift quite a bit. For the first couple minutes after starting the car it ran like a demon, then the ecu would pull the timing out and ran like garbage. Replaced the CAS and the idle changed, egt's changed, and fuel curve is out of whack now but the car still feels stronger. I need to retune.

I'm pretty damned happy :D

got any pics of the worn cas "nub"...so the rest of us can see it :P

Haven't taken any yet, it's really hard to tell from visual inspection. It looks a little different than the one I put in. The edges were a bit rounded off. I suppose the entire unit could be bad. I'm just happy the thing is back to normal.

I can take a pic when I get home after work, I'm not sure how well pics will turn out though.

Dont forget an RB20DET Auto Motor/Loom/ECU will want to run 20degrees whereas the Manual engine/loom/ecu combo will want 15 degrees. Pretty sure it says that under my bonnet!

Im manual now but have an Auto Engine (as noted by the TPS etc) and I run 20 deg.

JK

skypy12,

Forget the ECU, the ecu has no influence over the timing light read out.

The idea is you match the two, 15degree's at the crank and 15degree's base inside the ecu.

Also you stated,

CAM belt has been double checked and is all aligned correctly and when put at top dead centre (i think thats what u call it) the harmonic balance also reads 15degrees where is should be.

The harmonic balancer is set to 0degree's or TDC, and both cam gears are set to TDC or centerline 0degree's.

But as said, cheap timing lights do read incorrectly on some RB's.

On mine it does, the only one i've seen work is some fandangled digital one that you point and it displays the ignition timing.

well i have since now swapped ECU's with a mate who has a manual R32 gtst.

and whola timing ran at 20 degrees. which is a 10 degrees drop from the 30 it was running with my computer. (which is what i want it running considering the car used to be an auto)

i have no idea. why or how this logically was causing the problems but meh now i'm looking for a manual r32 or Cefiro computer.....

BTW: nothing else was changed on the car between the ECU swaps....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...