Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

now those of you who have read some of my other posts on this forum will know how much I dislike A Current Affair, but tonight they actually did something good for a change.

tonight they did a story on some of the problems in our traffic law, namely people still loosing points on charges they have beaten in court, and the fact that members of the public have no right of appeal, yet the RTA has a right to appeal a decision made by the court if a member of the public beats a charge.

now as anyone who knows even a liitle bit about traffic law will know, there are many unfair inadaquacies like this through out the laws, it really is a case of GUILTY UNTILL PROVEN INNOCENT!!! and the rta and the state governments has done everything in its power to prevent people from being able to prove there innocence.

so what has this got to do wit ACA? well despite how I or anyone else feels about them, they are in a position to put a lot of pressure on the government to change the inadequacies in the law.

So I think it would be a good idea for everyone to write to ACA and commend them for running a story like this and let them know how angry we all are with the state governments over these laws. If ACA thinks there is enough intrest in this topic, than they'll probably keep running stories on it, and then sure enough all the other tabloid current affair shows like today tonight, 60 minutes etc and the tabloid newspapers like the daily telegraph, should hopefully follow suite. this should put tremendous pressure on the government to ammend the laws.

contact ACA here:

http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/feedback/feedback_form.asp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77339-a-potential-door-has-been-opened/
Share on other sites

I'm all for it, even though I think that ACA's program is gutter checkbook journalism at its most despicable.

If the ACA realises that public opinion goes the other way and they can make ratings from showing the flipside, then they'll bring their infinitely biased and sensationalistic skills to shaming the RTA and government instead of young drivers.

But they don't run the same kind of "4 part series, featuring interviews with the shadow police minister who's an ex-cop, as well as a behind-the-scenes look at what cops are doing to crack down on this kind of hooniganism" when it comes to "Aussie battlers battling the bureaucracy"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...