Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just go for the complete bolt on one..saves you some bucks..depends if you want bigger injectors.. there are only a number of sizes injectors that straight fit RB25.. you can go 740cc..im not too sure but i think that's the biggest... if you go top feed..you'd be needing new fuel rails / resistor packs and all.

anyways...practically,..just go bolt on.

Injectors is were alot of people make mistake's.

Top feed & bling bling rail injector set up's are just going to be more trouble then their worth. As if their not high impedence their not going to work.

Nismo 740's or 550cc's are direct replacements into the standard fuel rail, no need to modify anything at all, the only thing i would recomend changing is the rubber o-rings that the injector sits on. - Cheap as under $5

And if you are going to replace your injectors to a larger size you cannot use them with the stock ecu, you will have to go aftermarket as your car will run like, sh!t and very very rich.

Low impedence injectors are possible to use on a RB25 but you will need resistor pack to change the impedence to 12 - 16ohm's. - A waste of time if you ask me when the direct replacements will do the same job, hassell free!

2 eg.

RB25 with Nismo direct replacement injectors, took the afternoon to fit them and get working, car was drivable no drama's except for the one o-ring that was not sealing so had to be replaced.

SR20 with denso 780cc injectors with custom fuel rail, took 4 days to get it working and running, as we had dramas with collar's and the injectors not sealing in the rail and a number of other things, the car runs fine now, the price turned out to be more expensive then the RB25 direct replacements.

;)

Cam

Injectors is were alot of people make mistake's.

Top feed & bling bling rail injector set up's are just going to be more trouble then their worth. As if their not high impedence their not going to work.

Nismo 740's or 550cc's are direct replacements into the standard fuel rail, no need to modify anything at all, the only thing i would recomend changing is the rubber o-rings that the injector sits on. - Cheap as under $5

And if you are going to replace your injectors to a larger size you cannot use them with the stock ecu, you will have to go aftermarket as your car will run like, sh!t and very very rich.

Low impedence injectors are possible to use on a RB25 but you will need resistor pack to change the impedence to 12 - 16ohm's. - A waste of time if you ask me when the direct replacements will do the same job, hassell free!

2 eg.

RB25 with Nismo direct replacement injectors, took the afternoon to fit them and get working, car was drivable no drama's except for the one o-ring that was not sealing so had to be replaced.

SR20 with denso 780cc injectors with custom fuel rail, took 4 days to get it working and running, as we had dramas with collar's and the injectors not sealing in the rail and a number of other things, the car runs fine now, the price turned out to be more expensive then the RB25 direct replacements.

;)

Cam

thanks mate i have the ecu so no worries there , i think im just going to buy the bolt in injectors , seems like the smartest choice and the easiest

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...