Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think Nismo make "hardness up" rubber bushes:cheers:

Yep, they sure do. I just fitted the Nismo ones about 4 weeks ago.

My existing bushes had split and leaked the silicon(?) fluid out of them.

Putting the Nismo's in really has turned it into a go-kart.. but of course since the stock ones were shot - you would expect that.

I got them straight from a Nissan dealer here in Perth. Watch out though, they are a little over $100 each (and you need 4) They are a solid black rubber material. I don't know if they are stiffer or not that Poly bushes, but I think Poly is a third of the price. (I learned that after I had bought the Nismo's)

Also, NVH has definitely increased for me. In fact I even feel a bit of a vibration through the seat between 80-100km/hr. This may be "something else" vibrating that needs looking at - and perhaps the bushes have just brought it to my attention. Below 80km/hr, they feel fine. Point is, the vibration wasn't felt prior to them being fitted.

Hi Trust33;

1. The weakest link is always the weakest link, but there is no doubt that more contact patch from less roll will help any tyre.

2. When you lower them they end up at 1 to 1.5 degrees negative anyway, then add the Whiteline adjusters and you usually get 2.5 degrees negative.  Which is not a bad place to start 

3. Nope

:)

Ah-so Confusius.:D

Ive been reading a little about handeling and suspension for cars.Allot of the posts made by yourself and others.

It's not that confusing when it's understood better like anything really,one thing affects another though thats what has to be considered when seting up the car.

The handelling pack sounds good for the 33.

Drop it back a gear and let me know if it still vibrates.

My g/box has done that in 5th around 95-100km/h since day 1. :rofl:

I'll do that!

Gimme a few days - she's in the workshop having Motec fitted (yay!)

(hmm.. wonder if I can 'tune out' the vibration...)

But yeah I'll let you know,

Bl4cK32, just to clear up a couple of things, aluminium pineapples will increase the NVH, as will poly.

Poly bushes will allow you to change the geometry of the cradle, BUT, as so commonly believed, DO NOT set up for slip - this makes absolutely no sense, and will make your car handle like a pig. For drift, you NEED traction - otherwise you just spin out all the time.

There are a few ways you can go with pineapples - using both alluminium and poly or just poly or just aluminium. If you are concerned about NVH, use poly upper and aluminium lower pineapples. Running a mech diff, this is probably the way to go if you dont want largely increased NVH.

I have used poly only, poly and alluminium and alluminium only. I only noticed a major increase in nvh with all alluminium, as you would expect.

If you are changing the sub frame bushes, it would be worth fitting pineapples for grip (needed in your case :)) at the same time, as you have to drop the cradle to do them - save dropping the cradle twice. (for grip, you need to put pineapples at the front between the body and the cradle, tilting the front down.)

If you want grip, also consider traction rods (D1 Garage do a modified OEM traction arm for around $40, works well). Also, if you are going the drift way, run around 3 to 4 mm total toe in on the rear, or more, as it will help keep the back end tight when you are sideways, ie, it wont just swing around all over the place. With the amount of torque you are putting down it wont hurt at all. A well set up drift car has MASSIVE grip, its a common myth that they dont.

Also, I hope you have pissed off the hicas by now :P

Thanks Steve, some good info there.

I'll be replacing my subframe buses with the Noltec jobbies and also slap a set of pinapples in there for good measure.

I'm also going to drop in a tightened up S13 3.9:1 diff as the 4.363:1 tends to feel as if you don't get to use the torque of the 3ltr. :P

I'm bolting a VG30DET turbo that should see me slightly over 200rwkw. It will do for now until I sort out the traction issues. As Darren is all too aware it really sucks the way it is setup now.

I literally cannot bring it up on boost in first, second axle tramps like all bugger leaving you all the way through second trying to play with the accelerator to get some power down. :)

I found with the 3037, for traction I had to go larger exhaust housing, made it easier to control with the right foot instead of being on/off, boost ramped so hard there is no way to control it apart from not use it - might be worht having a look in that direction too, especially with the extra cc and torque.

good luck

It is still running the little rb20det turbo that makes its peak power around 4400rpm so no doubt that is causing the lack of traction, hopefully the larger exhaust a/r vg30 turbo will smooth it out a little.

I've been talking to GCG, they have said 260rwkw from their rb25 highflow is around the mark so they seem to think the vg30 turbo with its larger exhaust a/r will allow the turbo to make close to 280rwkw.

I would be happy enough with that. Especially considering it won't be laggy and still get up and move from 3000-3500rpm onwards.

Bl4cK32, just to clear up a couple of things, aluminium pineapples will increase the NVH, as will poly.

Poly bushes will allow you to change the geometry of the cradle, BUT, as so commonly believed, DO NOT set up for slip - this makes absolutely no sense, and will make your car handle like a pig. For drift, you NEED traction - otherwise you just spin out all the time.

There are a few ways you can go with pineapples - using both alluminium and poly or just poly or just aluminium. If you are concerned about NVH, use poly upper and aluminium lower pineapples. Running a mech diff, this is probably the way to go if you dont want largely increased NVH.

I have used poly only, poly and alluminium and alluminium only. I only noticed a major increase in nvh with all alluminium, as you would expect.

If you are changing the sub frame bushes, it would be worth fitting pineapples for grip (needed in your case :P) at the same time, as you have to drop the cradle to do them - save dropping the cradle twice. (for grip, you need to put pineapples at the front between the body and the cradle, tilting the front down.)

If you want grip, also consider traction rods (D1 Garage do a modified OEM traction arm for around $40, works well). Also, if you are going the drift way, run around 3 to 4 mm total toe in on the rear, or more, as it will help keep the back end tight when you are sideways, ie, it wont just swing around all over the place. With the amount of torque you are putting down it wont hurt at all. A well set up drift car has MASSIVE grip, its a common myth that they dont.

Also, I hope you have pissed off the hicas by now :D

Cheers Steve. Im doing the rear cradle over christmas, and i think ill go for new sub frame bushes, combined with poly upper and aluminium lower pineapples...thanks for the help :D I did remember you told me drifters need the grip..

Oh yer...got a hicas lock kit here waiting to go on as well...will do that after doing the cradle, then get a wheel alignment shortly after :D

Dont really want to set the car up for drift...more grip to help with the torque:uh-huh:

hey Darren, how's the GT Pro going? what setting (soft-med-hard) is it on? hope you're luving it hehe.

Just to add to the discussion, I had whiteline's pineapple kit on my old 32. The 'drift' setting was stupid, the tail would just snap out. The advice you're getting is good :( I have aluminium upper and lower spacers on my present car - they give a very direct feel, but are a bit harsh on bumpy sydney roads. I think the poly upper + aluminium lower route is a good idea.

Hey, hows it goin mate :(

Diff is going great. One of the best things ive bought for my car actually. Was very easy to get used to, and helps the car out heaps.

Its still set on soft, the way i got it from you :(

Roads are bumpy here in Adelaide too, so id like to keep NVH down as low as i can get it...its mainly my daily driver, so more traction is always good :D

If you want grip, also consider traction rods (D1 Garage do a modified OEM traction arm for around $40, works well).

With these Steve, i havent heard much about them. I havent looked at the rear suspension too close, and dont know where they are situated on the rear...

Care to shed some light for me on what they do / and what they adjust.....*I need to use the search button more i think* :mad:

No worries at all.

They are the rods that run forward from the rear axle, attaching to the uprights. The modified ones are shorter, and give more traction. The ones James do are as shown to him by Bai - sort of an old school Jap trick that apparently works as well as aftermarket for a fraction of the price. James car definately has gobs of traction, its amazing.

Aftermarket do the same thing for around $300.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...