Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i own a R32 GTR for a lappo, & a 10sec Rx3 coupe, rotaries are a cheap way to go fast! my rx3 runs 10.63 on a std import 13b eng, with a high flow turbo. very cheap & very easy to do. now im currently porting the eng & im going to run a large turbo (GT42 ..T76) & that will push the car into the 9sec bracket! early rx's hold their value very well & its going up every day!

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hold on, hold on. In one revolution of a rotary engine 100% of its combustion chambers ignite (if you understand what I mean). In one revolution of a cylinder engine 50% of its combustion chambers ignite (not taking into account 5 and 7 cylinder engines BMW produced). So the ratio is 1:2. i.e. Rotary conumes twice more air and fuel than the cylinder engine of the same displacement.

However the rotary still makes 3 power strokes.

with the rotaries combustion cycle for one complete revolution of a rotary it fires 6 times. so a 2 rotor 12a,13b is the equivalent of a 6 cylinder and a 20b 3 rotor is the equal to a 9 cylinder engine

for me I love the fact that something so small can create such a great amount of power and I LOVE the sound of a rotary especially the 20B mmmmmmmmmmmm

  • 4 weeks later...
i own a R32 GTR for a lappo, & a 10sec Rx3 coupe, rotaries are a cheap way to go fast! my rx3 runs 10.63 on a std import 13b eng, with a high flow turbo. very cheap & very easy to do. now im currently porting the eng & im going to run a large turbo (GT42 ..T76) & that will push the car into the 9sec bracket! early rx's hold their value very well & its going up every day!

Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I was under the impression that it wasn't really as easy as putting on a high flowed turbo to a standard engine and then running 10's. Don't you still need engine management, bigger fuel system etc...?

I had a 12A bridgeport RX7 for about 2 years. Most people have answered this thread but I thought id add my bit..

They Rev hard.. And I mean hard.. I changed gears at about 6'000 rpm and it would pull very hard.. pull very hard towards the bank! As it used so much damn fuel it wasnt funny, Id put in about $45 in and get about 250ks from it.

Sorry to drag up an old thread, but I was under the impression that it wasn't really as easy as putting on a high flowed turbo to a standard engine and then running 10's. Don't you still need engine management, bigger fuel system etc...?

True, engine management would be a must have and if you wanted to run 10's then yeah I think you would need a bigger fuel system.

Dammm... I want a rotary now... No actually... I want a ZTUNE first... then an RX7. :drooling: Rotaries sound like a lota fun, I like the idea of putting a 'f#ck off how big is that' turbo under the bonnet. I seen the RX7 with licence plate "13G" with a set up like that... was so nice.

That 13g rx7 (can see it on city performance website) actualy has a 13g engine in it, which is a factory mazda race engine with factory peripheral ports.

yeah I had a good look at it in person probably about 7 months back on a cruze, it is an amazing RX7 thats for sure.

That 13g rx7 (can see it on city performance website) actualy has a 13g engine in it, which is a factory mazda race engine with factory peripheral ports.

Lookie lookie what I found :D I took these back on that cruze....

12805DSCN0013.JPG

12805DSCN0014.JPG

"big turbo did you say???"

12805DSCN0026.JPG

It looks even bigger in real life... Look, you can even see the gold MoTeC box on the right... :drooling:

.

Meh, mine made 400hp on 6psi so it doesn't seem that odd.

Rotaries compare like this

13b comparable to a 2.4 or 2.6 L 4 or 6 cylinder piston, depending on who you talk to.

Mazda actually measure the displacement the "proper" way, if you want to compare a rotary to a pistons displacement you have to double it.

so,

13b = 2.6L

20b = 4.0L

26b = 5.2L

rough guide but you get the idea

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's a boring history lesson on number plates People want illegal spacing to make their plate more readable, if mine was J2X BK, anyone who knows about the car would see that its spelling JZX. Years ago third party plate manufacturers could alter the text to make it look like something else, nowadays the computer software is locks that ability (well, ours does at work) Up until 2001 the first letter of a number plate represented the year of the vehicle, for example A would be 1983. (pre 1983, the format was backwards, so the year letter was on the end). Followed by 3 random numbers and 3 random letters. Things started to get complicated at the end of the 90s where T and V were 1999, W and X were 2000 and Y was early 2001. From 2001 they introduced a new 'layout' where the first two characters are letters, this represented where that vehicle was first registered in the country. The letters corrosponded to a region in the country. Some regions had a large number of codes, where as some only had a couple (despite being large in physical land size) Next are 2 numbers to indicate 2000s. So it went from: Y (March 1999 > Aug 2000) 51 (Sept 2001 > Feb 2002) 02 (March 2002 > Aug 2002) 52 (Sept 2002 > Feb 2003) etc etc When the 2010s got here, the numbers changed again, going up by tens 10 (March 2010 > Aug 2010) 60 (Sept 2010 > Feb 2011) When the 2020s arrived it went to 20 (March 2020 > Aug 2020) 70 (Sept 2020 > Feb 2021) etc As for personalised plates, you're not allowed a registration that makes the vehicle look newer. Take my 110 for example, its a 2004 car so I can have any available plate upto 04. I can't have a 54 because it was manufactured in August 2004. Which allows me to have a J plate, because its older (if that makes sense)    
    • Mount some of these on your dash? https://www.greddy.com/products/16001720  
    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
×
×
  • Create New...