Jump to content
SAU Community

33GTSt How much boost can you run?

PHATGTR

By PHATGTR,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well thats up to you guys to believe that but thats what the dyno sheet says and i haven't seen one that has lied before

Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings. They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter. Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi. 210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm T is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

someonestolecc Grand Master

someonestolecc

Posted
Posted

Stop hi jacking this guys thread. It's called tractive effort and there's plenty of info why it's not always correct and how it works. Torque is a figure based from rpm and kw anyways so you can always work it out yourself.

My sr20 has around 650nm of torque according to the dyno. Big deal.

NA_R33 Grand Master

NA_R33

Posted
Posted
Lol Many dyno sheets have lied before... There are dynos out there which are just plain inaccurate & there's also ways to cheat / fake dyno readings.  They can involve messing with the AT & IT temps for a starter.  Sorry dude but theres no other way to break it you you... There is no way your car is making 729 Nm based on the fact its 2L & running 16psi.  210rwkw sounds right, but 729 for Nm is way off.

Maybe try to listen & learn what we're trying to explain to you instead of telling us we're wrong or being so certain you're right ‘with no facts to back your theory up other than "Dynos dont lie" :rofl:'.

:P

Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
Maybe you should go learn about tractive effort mate... its not torque.. and what the dyno has told him is more then correct for tractive effort.. do some research before you go arguing with people. I have had this debate about torque and tractive effort so many times before its not funny so im not even gonna bother try explaining it, research it for yourself. In first gear my car makes over 2000NM's of tractive effort on the dyno.. its not wrong nor is it incorrect.

Yeh I get the different between the two. I was correct to say he doesnt have that much Nm in Torque. We're just talking about being specific here. I think people seen 729NM on their dyno sheet & think that comparable to say the Nm reading you'll see in Motor mags where they're actually at the fly & true figures to the engines Torque. So to say you have 729 NM torque is incorrect. If he corrects that to 729 Nm Tractive Effort in say 4th Gear well it's all good then isnt it. Why bother to even say you have XXX Nm based of your dyno sheet without specifying what gear it was pulled in also, without stating the gear it hold's no importance really. There's a quite a difference between say 3rd & 4th gear. & like you said, put it into 1st & that figure jumps sky high.

http://www22.brinkster.com/badgermotorspor/Dyno.html

wheels_24 Collaborator

wheels_24

Posted
Posted

well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

geno8r Grand Master

geno8r

Posted
Posted
well it was in 4th gear and i wasn't the one who started this you did i am only going on what i have been told and what my dyno tells me. I don't need to go and do any research cause i am not that fused with the topic. It seems that geno8r is so but, and someonestolecc is correct you have just made a depate in someone else's thread

Yep explanation over... It's been explained to you that you have 729 Nm of Tractive Effort in 4th & not 729Nm T. Whether you keep your sig "729 Nm T" or not is your choice. I Just thought if someone was displaying something false they might want to be informed & learn something new? I think it’s good if some1 can explain something to me properly if I’m wrong, I spose I just like to learn & grow from the experience. Isn’t that a major factor of car forums, learn something new. Ehhh over anyways now. Enjoy your “729 Nm T” beast.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • Duncan
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By Duncan · Posted

      To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • Duncan
      Duncan's V37.......race car?

      By Duncan · Posted

      So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • RP1421
      S15 Spec R

      By RP1421 · Posted

      As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • joshuaho96
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...