Jump to content
SAU Community

  

75 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

The only goddamn bloody difference between electronic and mechanical gauges, is that in an electronic gauge, the electronic sensor converts the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal, which can then be carried via wires through the firewall up to an electronic unit which converts it back to analog. In a mechanical system, the gauge simply reads whatever pressure level is fed to it.

Imagine having a mechanical oil temp gauge - > and the oil line inside the cabin breaks and you get 80 degree oil poured into your cabin ;)

Electronic Gagues are more accurate and more expensive

Mechanical arent as accurate and are cheaper.

plus depending on the gauge can be dangerous.

if you have the money always go electronic.

mick

that in an electronic gauge, the electronic sensor converts the signal from an analog signal to a digital signal, which can then be carried via wires through the firewall up to an electronic unit which converts it back to analog. In a mechanical system, the gauge simply reads whatever pressure level is fed to it.

Digita signal??? Doesnt it just convert the reading into an analog signal; and then at the control unit reads the signal where a certain voltage equals whatever. I dont think there is a need to convert anything to digital

Most gauges in domestic cars should be electric, therefore reducing the risk of exposure to unwanted stuff like hot oil...

Most performance cars in the states and drag racing use mechanical, with such items as fuel mounted externally under ANDRA regs etc.

The best responsive gauges I have found are mechancial especially with regard to boost. I have always run mechancial in other cars but external mounted, otherwise run full sweep electric (I like Autometre sorry).

Most Jap ones are electric for the reason that they install them inside the ****pit!!!

Is there a reason why you think the mech boost gauges are more accurate. An electric gauge would be able to put the sensor within a few inches of the preessure source meaning that it will react very quickly, whilst the mechanical gauge needs metres of hosing so it can be plumbed up to the gauge....plus surely a diaphragm and voltage signal will be better calibrated/more robust then a mechanical gauge????

Who needs boost gauges anyway..what you dont know cant hurt you:)

mechanical boost is more accruate and responsive as despite the tube being at a distance, the line has a constant pressure. Whereas the electronic measures at intervals and then transmits the data from the sensor to the guage itself. Some electronic ones are good, however I cannot justify $300-$400 for an electronic boost gauge compared to a mechanical when it does the same job. For other uses I would go electronic, such as oil pressure (sometimes it can be beneficial for a mechanical as well in some applications), water temp, oil temp as these do not move in a huge hurry...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...