Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

newais i did a compression test on my r33 gtst, this is what i got

121, 131, 150, 120, 121, 121

i know they arent even and that is bad, newias how long would this motor last me if i was to drive it normally? when do i expect the motor to blow?

car has a pod, 3` turbo back exhuast and has 125,000kms on it.. for a 93 model

newias after putting everything back, i start the car up 1st time, it made a funny whistle sound for couple secs, then was back to normal, i turned the car off and tried it again, there was no more weird sound, so everything was sounding right,

i took the car for a drive, i notice that boost only hit 5psi max at 7000rpm

before i did the compression test, car was boosting at 7psi when i rev over 5000rpm, now what could be wrong? i checked if any boost was leaking or nething and tightening every hose up and stuff, and i connected all spark plugs and coils back properly and all, what could be wrong guys? help plzz

those compression readings aren't too good.

not sure what's wrong though (check that you've replaced crossover pipe properly, there may be a couple of earth wires going to some of the bolts that hold crossover pipe on -not sure on rb25det, but worth a shot)..

can't remember where ignition module is on rb25det, but on rb20's it's on one end of the coil pack cover. check that! (plugs & earth wires etc.)

check coil packs & the plugs (and spark plugs). also i hope you didn't drop one of the coil packs coz that can kill 'em. also if u dropped a sparkplug, may have changed the gaps (a long shot, but though i'd suggest everything that comes to mind)

how did you do compression test? did you remove all spark plugs, and fuel pump fuse and crank engine. was it warm or cold? should be warm

if compression varies it is bad.

I'd say less than about 130 psi is bad compression. I think that's what nissan manual says. (165psi is normal, anything below 130 is bad)

who knows what's gonna happen to the engine, get a mecahnic to perform a proper leak down test or whatever on it, and that will tell you where the compression is leaking from & what's wrong with the engine.

what made you do a comp test in the first place? has the engine been running badly?

newais went to mechanic, was faulty spark plugs, and he did a test, with a proper tester that costs 2-3 hundred buks and turns out that i got around 150-155 on all cylinders which is pretty good LOL

=]

so whoeva is using them shitty testers that cost $30 from super cheap auto or smfing, then i sugest u buy a proper one or get test done at mechanics, as they are very not accuarate at all

1/ "newais" and "sumfing" are words in what language?

2/ Cheap compression testers are garbage - and now you know.

Adrian

no need to be a prick there mate. i knew what he was saying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...