Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

After a debate with one of my friends we could not come to a conclusion on this matter.

Does the GTR have a sequential turbo set up?

by sequential i mean that it has a small turbo to spool up quickly, while the second, larger turbo kicks in after - to overcome the problem of lag and to give 'constant' boost..

I have always been under the impression that GTR's DID have a sequential turbo set up but after chattin to paulr33 (i think thats his name) he has seemed to convince me otheriwse..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/82855-gtrs-sequential-turbo-set-up/
Share on other sites

the GTR's use a true twin turbo arrangement meaning that it is NOT a sequential turbo system. So that is why the GTR's are more laggy down low in the revs as they have got each turbo working with only 1.3L and 3 cyclinders.

Toyota's 2jz-gte engine on the other hand has a sequential turbo setup, however, instead of having a smaller turbo matched with a larger turbo, i believe the stock turbos are the same size.

A true sequential turbo system was the B4 liberty - they had 2 different sized turbo's and there was alot of complaints because there was a point in the rev range where the first one would cut-out and the second one had to spool out - meaning you'd get a second of slight power loss..

GT-R's are twin turbo - both spool @ the same time with the same boost levels..

  • 1 year later...

The cost vs the results in doing such a setup simply put... isnt really worth it. It would require a fair bit of rooting around

Hence there arent a lot of cars around with this setup, as its costly.

Most people soon as they chase power, dispose of the sequential from the outset

A true sequential turbo system was the B4 liberty - they had 2 different sized turbo's and there was alot of complaints because there was a point in the rev range where the first one would cut-out and the second one had to spool out - meaning you'd get a second of slight power loss..

GT-R's are twin turbo - both spool @ the same time with the same boost levels..

been as passenger in a mate's old B4. didn't notice any power loss, infact as soon as the 2nd turbo kicked in at about 4-5grand it would just push you back into your seat. thats how i remembered it anyway ;)

been as passenger in a mate's old B4. didn't notice any power loss, infact as soon as the 2nd turbo kicked in at about 4-5grand it would just push you back into your seat. thats how i remembered it anyway ;)

It's a pretty common annoyance for B4 owners, I test drove one and found it to be quite noticeable, just over 4K IIRC.

VGT anyone?

It's a pretty common annoyance for B4 owners, I test drove one and found it to be quite noticeable, just over 4K IIRC.

VGT anyone?

I have found the same with the b4's, there is a hole at 4-4400 rpm.

It's a pretty common annoyance for B4 owners, I test drove one and found it to be quite noticeable, just over 4K IIRC.

I found this true also, a mate of mine has a legacy gt with the twin turbo sequential setup and between 4 and 5 grand it feels like its off boost. Seems kinda odd as they gave it a smaller turbo to be on boost earlier but then it lags in the middle of the rev range anyway... :)

Several companies have tried to get sequential turbos to work, and most of them have failed. Whether its a torque hole during the transition (i.e. B4) or the convoluted plumbing that has a reputation for failing (RX7), eventually people give up on it.

I don't know why you'd want to have sequential turbos that are the same size (a la the 2JZ-GTE) - if you want something to spool faster before you get the big power, why not get a smaller turbine matched to a bigger one? If they're the same size you may as well put them in parallel (like the RB26DETT) rather than in series, and just use smaller turbos.

Of course, the new BMW 335 has a sequential setup and by all accounts its a smooth engine. I wouldn't mind taking one for a drive and giving it a go, but it might be a sequential turbo setup worth buying.

Yeah as mentioned the 2jz uses sequential turboes of the same size, Toyota did this to gain low down power and anyone thats drivin a supra will also know around 4000RPM there is a drop in power when the 2nd turbo comes online.

Turbos have come a long way since the mid 90's tho hence the reason people put on big singles on the 2jz. A GT35R wont spool much slower than a stock sequential system on a 2j but will make alot more power.

There would be alot of R&D needed to make a sequential setup for a GTR, IMO money would be better spent on a 3L bottom end if you wanted quicker spool

Edited by eddieneedsboost

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...