Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

There was an article in Tuesday’s Gold Coast Bulletin! Page 12

Who do you choose to run your city?

Tod would like a go! So if you could please help him out by sending a message that would be much appreciated! He is a salesperson at my work RE/MAX Property Leaders. Pass it on to all your family and friends too.

Please SMS

Wildcard “Tod Scotman” Great Aussie bloke, wont take not rubbish!

To 0416 905 147

Thanks for your support!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/84341-vote-1-for-tod-scotman/
Share on other sites

its just a local paper survey on who should be the next mayor of the goldcoast city council

this has been kicked up by a cmc investigation into the way certain members of the council had their campaigns funded and consequently their voting habits with regards to develepmont ect.

theres a good chance that if the councilors are found guilty that a government apointed administrator will take over and all the elected persons will be sacked.

this is similar to what happened in tweed heads recently where the entire council was sacked and administrators apointed. currently they are looking to change the local government rules so that those sacked councilors will be unable to stand for reelection at the next election

hope that makes sense

Is that dog in the tree in pain or wot?

NO the dog is not getting hurt, do you guys always analyse things like this??? I voted for him because he has lived on the Gold Coast his life and if he gets even close to winning, Remax will get free publicity, so yeah!!! He would mostly take care of your properties, for example there is a neighbourhood of people who have had there properties in the family for 100 years or something and there getting pushed out because of some law, I don’t know the whole story there is a whole lot of stuff behind it, anyway getting to the point he will try and stop these things plus the guy in lead doesn’t even live on the Gold Coast. You don’t have to vote, but if you meet him you would vote!! (Like my speech, you better) :(

yeah but at the end of the day he is a realestate agent

their credibility is up there with used car salesman, loan sharks, lawyers and politicians :(

hmmm a real estate agent who wants to be a politician ... double whammy

j/k by the way

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...