Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was reading the new HPI mag and read something about building a 2.4 ltr RB20, it said you use a gtr crank and rods with 4AGZE pistons.

Anyone built/heard of one locally. For the price of a stuffed rb20 it would be as cheap as buying a rb25 probably with something a little different.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ok I have heard of

rb 2.2, = tomei larger pistons only

2.3 bigger pistons 81-81 mm with rb25 crank and rods

2.4 with the tomei pistons and rb26 crank and rods there is machinig requiered but not sure what

2.45 special hks cranks rods etc and dispalyed on my site

do a search on the sdu foums it has been disussed heaps personally I would only do the tomei pistons or copies 82 mm cause I know some one who made around 600 with this combo.

and decided againt the 2.4 kit cause and rb 25/26 was chaeper this was in japan

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123615
Share on other sites

Guest Works Auto

Guys im in the process of building a RB24 for my 32 as yet ive only got the 26 crank and rods havent yet sussed out what im gonna do for pistolas but my mechanic says he has it sorted so we will just have to wait an see what goes.

Im nearly finnished my upright manifolds for the twin TBO's and the 100mm bar n plate core going into my standard GTR cooler along with the custom plenum with 76mm throtle body, GTR injectors, after market rail and GTR pump it should go a bit better than a standard RB20.

Ill post reports and pics as they are available.

Cheers

Ross

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123761
Share on other sites

Guest Works Auto

Im sure you have heard of ND4SPD well he is a mate and he is doing the mechanical work as for compression well im an office jockey/salesman so id have to ask him about that so ill let u know.He also seems to think the RB20 pistolas wil fit with the 26rods and crank,.....Cant see it myself but he is the mechanic so i guess he would have a better idea than me. We got a few RB20 blocks and shit around so we will dummy together one before we do it to make sure.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123788
Share on other sites

Yeah I heard of him, didn't know he built engines. I would agree with Meggala, that to get the increase in displacement that your after you will need bigger pistons. Luckily the RB20 blocks are relatively cheap so you can do some experimenting.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123804
Share on other sites

The main disadvantage, as I see it is the RB20 cylinder head.

You are going to be stuck with this, even after an increase in capacity, it will limit the final power potential.

The RB25 and RB26 have a far better cylinder head design, and thus a lot more potential for development. The best bang for your buck would be an RB25DET fitted with RB26 crank, rods, and pistons. This RB26DET would then take some serious bolt on external hardware without complaint.

Personally I would prefer this RB26DET combination to an RB30DET, but it depends on what you want I suppose.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123839
Share on other sites

I remember reading some where that if you use the RB20 Pistions and RB26 crank it only strokes out to 2.1-2.2ltrs. Not much at all.

Really by the time you build the RB24 with new pistions etc the price wouldn't work out much different to a RB25.

Only advantage would be insurance and registration issues.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123878
Share on other sites

I think they want to do it partly for the novelty factor, but also because when you build an engine like that you have control over bore/stroke ratios, compression etc, and therefore the result can often be better than many of the more common engines around.

I think it is a good idea, but to get the capacity you will need bigger pistons. Good luck with the engine build, keep us updated with the progress, photos etc.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123930
Share on other sites

Yeah it is just something different, depends on the price but you may be able to get a motor built for similar costs to an rb25(you would still need the box though) and at least you know the motor would be right and not break in a hurry if its done right.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-123976
Share on other sites

It is a great engine if you want it to rev out. Lets face it rb20s rev out much higher and better than 25s, by increasing the displacement you have better mid range and the revy top end.

I too have had serious thoughts about it, but unfortunately the RB20 is such a fussy enginem the 25 starts to look like a good investment.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-124018
Share on other sites

Originally posted by meggala

ok I have heard of

rb 2.2, = tomei larger pistons only  

2.3 bigger pistons 81-81 mm with rb25 crank and rods

2.4 with the tomei pistons and rb26 crank and rods there is machinig requiered but not sure what

 

2.45 special hks cranks rods etc and dispalyed on my site

do a search on the sdu foums it has been disussed heaps personally I would only do the tomei pistons or copies 82 mm cause I know some one who made around 600 with this combo.

and decided againt the 2.4 kit cause and rb 25/26 was chaeper this was in japan

meggala

what about a 2.8, i've seen a special edition r33 gtst series II with 2.8 litre engine????

I think the r33 is an MR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8478-rb24/#findComment-124101
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...