T0nyGTSt Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Compared to a basic pod or custom box + pod? T. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
crooser Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 i have heard the standard air box will flow enough for 400hp what are you using now? are you having problems with it? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123711 Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0nyGTSt Posted January 11, 2003 Author Share Posted January 11, 2003 HKS supa mega slurpee. Can't get a box to cover it. I'm gonna visit UAS and get their cheap fiberglass box and some sort of smaller filter. T. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123713 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTS-t VSPEC Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Factory filter is crap, at the very least replace it with a K&N one or something like that, I'd be tempted to replace the airbox aswell, no point making the car work hard to get it's air. I have a Blitz SUS pod filter, very high flow, poor filtering. See'ya:burnout: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123754 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rev210 Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 stock air box is ok. The Mine's guys use it on their GTR's, with a little better ducting and an aftermarket panel element.Their GTR is around 700HP. I have the factory unit with a K&N filter, it's not too bad. Comparing the best with the worst (factory paper filter) all you are going to get is 4rwhp if you are lucky. Put the spare $200 you save on the K&N panel over the pod / custom box and put it into something else. Unless you like the induction noise that is. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123887 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay95R33 Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 I've been wondering this myself. Is it worth the extra 4hp and the hassles with noise and rego ??? The induction noise is OK, but can tick me off at times - it attracks alot of attention... :uh-huh: :uh-huh: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123892 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTS-t VSPEC Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 I agree with rev210 that the difference in power is small, but I think the biggest advantage is in throttle response, the air doesn't have to overcome the extra resistance of the panel style filters. So while top end power is negligible the usable power is more responsive. I've felt the difference in my car and would never go back, but if you don't want to spend the money then the stock box will still work. See'ya:burnout: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123941 Share on other sites More sharing options...
doxximus Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 im gonna completely remove the airbox (keep it in my garage for emergencies ) and have a stainless steel pipe going all the way down to my front bar on the side where the standared cooler goes (gotta love 400r front bar) with a filter at the end like k&n or something Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-123944 Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline33 Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 doxx, i think if you place it that low and that exposed, it will gather alot of crap and get dirty very quickly Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124093 Share on other sites More sharing options...
d0p3y Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Yeah probrably not a good idea doxx, will get damaged easily cause lots of rocks and such and fly up there, not to mention bits of tar etc etc.. Unless you mesh around it or something, but then that restricts the air further.. As for the airboxes, wouldn't it be a good idea to put a k&N panel filter on and then just use a larger air intake scoop thingy, or a custom CAI pipe leading into the airbox itself?? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124100 Share on other sites More sharing options...
doxximus Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 hmmm...thought the mesh would help that out, we'll hjave to see, dunno maybe our plans will change but yeah haha i'll consider what u guys said Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124107 Share on other sites More sharing options...
2fardown Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 Adding a POD without getting cool air to it will not improve your performance much at all. The stock R33 airbox draws cool air from under the bonnet, simply adding a K&N panel filter will give you similiar performance gains, better filtering and draw cool air from outside. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124155 Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline33 Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 once i ran a pod on my stock r33 (no exhaust) and i felt like i lost power but my mate put one in with an exhaust he gained more power and after that he put a partition and he gained more power Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124169 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTS-t VSPEC Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 I certainly wouldn't expect anyone to loose power, the air intake on the stock airbox is quite restrictive and panel filters also require more effort for the air to get through. The pod filters in conjuction with a cold air intake or partition should lead to the best result. I would think that bringing the cold air to the filter would be easier and better than placing the filter down in the cold air, only a little bit of crap is required to stuff a turbo. Adding the POD without getting cold air to it will not add much top-end hp, but it should improve throttle response, but it is definately better if you can get cold air to it aswell. See'ya :burnout: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124174 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rev210 Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 The design of the air feed into the cold air box can have an effect on throttle response when moving at speed. The stock design takes air from an ideal pressure zone at the lip of the bonnet. When moving this enables a bit of air 'ramming', something alot of cold air partitions don't have, but race cars do. The pod filter does not provide any greater torque than an aftermarket panel, and without a cold air partition it is guarenteed to make less,the 'placebo' throttle response is the only thing improved if adding the pod without a partition. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124187 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTS-t VSPEC Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 If your running the stock cooler than the air temp might make a little bit of difference to power but with a decent cooler then you will make more power, even if only marginal. I don't think the throttle response is a 'placebo' effect, the increased airflow from the pod will help spin the turbo up sooner and should also allow better airflow back out aswell. See'ya:burnout: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124193 Share on other sites More sharing options...
rs73 Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 Does anyone knows what the K&N panel filter part no that will fit into R33 GTS-t standard airbox? Alternatively, what about IMPUL panel air filter, are they good, are they paper/oil type filter? I know K&N is oil type, will it mess up your hotwire airflow meter? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124455 Share on other sites More sharing options...
2fardown Posted January 12, 2003 Share Posted January 12, 2003 Originally posted by rs73 Does anyone knows what the K&N panel filter part no that will fit into R33 GTS-t standard airbox? Alternatively, what about IMPUL panel air filter, are they good, are they paper/oil type filter? I know K&N is oil type, will it mess up your hotwire airflow meter? The K&N filter for the R33 is the same as late 80's to current model commodores. Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124475 Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTS-t VSPEC Posted January 13, 2003 Share Posted January 13, 2003 Any oil type filter leaves you open for potential problems with the AFM, but they do provide better filtration, at the cost of airflow. The AFM can be cleaned so I wouldn't let it worry your too much. See'ya:burnout: Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-124685 Share on other sites More sharing options...
DAMQIK GTS-T Posted January 13, 2003 Share Posted January 13, 2003 How do those oil type filters go if ya don't oil them but do clean them regulary? Link to comment https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8500-how-bad-is-the-stock-airboxfilter/#findComment-125447 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now