Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by KamikazeR33

im sure this topic already came up joe :D

I am sure it has but that is just plain wrong advertising...

Some people think they know everthing even without do research!

Man I would be pissed off if you buy that car and find out it's just plain old RWD! not 4WD as it said. wouldn't you?

cheers

Joe

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8534-r33-gts-t-4wd/#findComment-124493
Share on other sites

The R33 GTS-t 4WD does exist, but I only know of one in WA, so I expect that they are a very rare factory production. Similarly to the R33's with the VSPEC diff and such these cars came out with a feature that was not in the normal production. I'm not sure if it was ever considered a factory option, or whether they just produced them to see what the effect was.

Anyway I can say with some authority that it does exit, although the likelyhood of seeing one is very low.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8534-r33-gts-t-4wd/#findComment-124705
Share on other sites

GTS-t VSPEC. The model you are talking about with the vspec diff was released as a production model, just in very limited numbers. I did have the specs for it somewhere and it was a fair bit more expensive than the normal gtst too when new. Never ever heard/seen of a factory awd gtst tho.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8534-r33-gts-t-4wd/#findComment-124799
Share on other sites

Yeah I feel kind of lucky to pick one up, knew that they were limited.

I'm guessing that the car I saw might have been one of the in-house models from Nissan, they do make some to order for the big tuning houses aswell.

I'm not mistaken by what I saw, I was there with a Engineering who does certification of ADR's, and he had never seen one either. Possibly not a production model, but too stock to have been aftermarket job.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/8534-r33-gts-t-4wd/#findComment-124808
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...