Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why should i be surprised... the S14 is basically stock besides a pod and a bit of boost? correct me if im wrong, but a 32 gts-t is about 1260Kg-1280kg....S14 is around the low 1200-1250 bit mark...right? weight isnt exactly an issue then.....moreso the torque factor....but surely the exhuast, cooler, etc. etc. should be make the RB20DET pull away from the SR on a freeway in 3rd (legal speeds of course :P ) Let me kno if u think otherwise...

Boost controller should cause boost to come in earlier should it? plus i can wind boost to wat say 12-14 PSI if im up for it.....that should fix this problem of lag should it??

also fitting a heat shielded pod could possibly bring more power out?!

i have a similiar problem with my FMIC i installed on saturday...

i seem to have less torque but the boost has definately increased, feels less laggy with boost coming on quicker, and there are flat spots thru the rev range with a huge one when cold...overall power loss is obvious, engine doesnt feel as strong :O

i guess i am sufering from the series2 R33 GTS-T computer problem with the ECU running rich and retarding timing...

just ordered a Power FC to remedy the problem.. ;)

Many years ago when I had a bar and plate fmic fitted I noticed a slight decrease in throttle response, mainly getting it up on boost in first and second. However 3rd gear + it actually felt as if it had picked up power once it was reving and was much more consistent.

I used to run 15psi, 17degree's timing 164rwkw.

On 12.5psi it ran a shade over 20degree's timing - 152rwkw.

The S14's go pretty well with simple mods such as exhaust and boost. To be honest I thought the s14 would be slightly quicker than a r32 with similiar mods.

91+ model R32s weigh slightly over 1300kg's. 89/90 models are high 1200's. Definitely not low to mid 1200's.

cubes is right.

see his stats.

I used to run 15psi, 17degree's timing 164rwkw.

On 12.5psi it ran a shade over 20degree's timing - 152rwkw.

now the S14 is lighter than the R32.

and

my S14 was producing 175rwkw with cooler, exhaust, pod 14.5psi and SAFC.

and is lighter than the r32.

so again, THAT is why your R32 with a fmic, pod, exhaust and 12 psi will not pull away from an S14 with exhaust pod and bit more boost.

it's the R31, R32 and R33 turbo's that have ceramic exhaust wheels.

my S14 was the original shape before the upgraded headlights.

if I had a powerfc, it would have pulled about 180-185rwkw on 15-16 psi boost.

I'd like to see a stock turbo R32 GTST do that with ecu, fmic and the rest of the supporting mods.

anyway, as people have said, increase the boost and timing if you can, while on a dyno with a A:F ratio reader up it's tail pipe to make sure it is all safe.

most boost controller (electronic or bleed valve) will make the boost come on a little earlier.. however, there are some that work better than others.

if you are on a budget, maybe try the one that people are raving about in a thread called "$22 boost controller" or something simimlar.

I think the price is about $45 now but stacks of people are extremely pleased with it and thye rave on about how it brings on boost so much earlier.

good luck..

Edited by GTST

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...