Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by Strich9ine

goddam joe, turn off that img in your sig' it's pissin me off....

next thing you know we end up with every newbie posing 1024x768 images in thier sigs like the supraforums....

BAH!! wish they never turned that on!

well it wasn't ur decision prank was being hounded from all over for it, pics will have limits and u can turn sigs off in your profile so its win win for eveyone

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Originally posted by CC

Joe

Mine is the same colour as that - pretty impressed with the paint work on mine - flawless!!

What is the value of one of these you reckon?

Would it be easy to put a turbo on one of these later down the track? I have been told its not that difficult? Any one know an approx price?

How / where do I find out about the cruises? It would be tops to perve on more skylines and get some tips from you enthusiasts....

See See

nah leave as NA dotn turbo it! it will cost you arms and legs!

if you want put RB26DETT depends on the price of the GTR engine.

If I knew you early I would have sold my BLITZ ECU and filter etc..etc. :D too late now.

only you can do is go raicey, Performance is out of the window with NA skylines.

jsut get decent sound system and body kits, you can do some engine mod but not much...

cheers

JOe

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Kym,

I just want it privately, an FTP address where Ken could send it and me retrive it would be good:D

See'ya:burnout:

ahh well..

If you send it to me, i can host it for you. I can't give out the password to the FTP account hey :D

lemme know if you need my help :uh-huh:

adam - when i cleaned the pipes on saturday morning it was terrible the amount of oil that was in there! admitedly it may have never been cleaned in nearly 100,000km, but the intercooler must be half bloody full!!

Hey gradenko ahs been running the coke bottle for around 6mnths now and hasnt had a worry. I am thinkin about doing the same thing but im worried that it might get a little heat soak casue of the rather small engine bay. Hey adam32 i might take that can off ya if the other guy dont want it.:D

It basically just a can with 2 holes in it right? cant be that hard to weld one up. Well if i had a welder :D

Who give dam how it looks? there is oil and stuff all over the palce anyway everything is black. What u gonna clean ure engine bay??? who the hell does that??..........oh wait....whups;)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...