Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1. If I get 86.5mm pistons to suit a GTR and use a stock head gasket will I get 8.5:1 compression ratio or does this require the GTR crank?

2. Will I be getting the lower compression ratio by increasing the distance to the top of the bore when the piston is fully up? If so I might as well be using RB25 pistons and 1.6mm metal head gasket because the squish areas are still having their effectiveness reduced right?

I'm thinking either Wiseco or Arias at this stage.

3. I've heard the NEO RB25 has GTR rods. Can anyone confirm?

4. How thick is the stock head gasket?

5. If I haven't got it right yet - how do I go about lowering the compression ratio to about 8.5-8.6 without wrecking the squish areas?

6. Do people think I will notice if I drop the CR to 8.2 instead?

7. I read elsewhere on here that dropping 0.5 in CR will require an increase of 0.2 in boost to get the same power. Is this true?

Thanks.

1. If I get 86.5mm pistons to suit a GTR and use a stock head gasket will I get 8.5:1 compression ratio or does this require the GTR crank?

2. Will I be getting the lower compression ratio by increasing the distance to the top of the bore when the piston is fully up?  If so I might as well be using RB25 pistons and 1.6mm metal head gasket because the squish areas are still having their effectiveness reduced right?

I'm thinking either Wiseco or Arias at this stage.

3. I've heard the NEO RB25 has GTR rods.  Can anyone confirm?

4. How thick is the stock head gasket?

5. If I haven't got it right yet - how do I go about lowering the compression ratio to about 8.5-8.6 without wrecking the squish areas?

6. Do people think I will notice if I drop the CR to 8.2 instead?

7. I read elsewhere on here that dropping 0.5 in CR will require an increase of 0.2 in boost to get the same power.  Is this true?

Thanks.

why do u want lower compression...?

standard head gasket 1.2mm

rods are not gtr this is confirmed!

also the head and block will need a shave so that will also change compression.

u will notice a big difference dropping compression to 8.5

my compression is 8.9 and u can still notice the difference in response.

:D;):)

You lower comp ratio with just gasket.

here is some charts from tomei

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu...B25_gasket.html

EDIT: personally, I would rebuild to 9:1 comp and get the ECU re-tuned since you are only chasing 250rwkw.

Edited by ed
I want to lower the compression to please my tuner.

Tell your tuner the Gibson GTR's ran 9.4 to 1, and that was 12+ years ago. ECU's have improved immensely since then. Lowering compression ratio is very old hat and low tech, tell him to get out the of the 80's.

:) cheers :D

I appreciate that the answer you are giving is the best one for the situation but without writing an essay about the comprimises I have to make I can't get my entire situation across.

Therefore I am asking some specific questions so I can make the best of my situation. Changing my tuner is something I'd like to do but I still need to find out the answers to the abovementioned questions. I know there are people here who know the answers, just hoping they might be able to help me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading through the engine service manual their advice is do a cylinder balance test. Unplug one injector at a time and see if the idle drops a consistent RPM. You can also do this using a Consult cable which is easier. They also call for unplugging the power transistor, then with the engine off and the fuel rail unhooked from the manifold verifying that you have good fuel flow (even injection, no dripping/leaks, etc) when you twist the CAS by hand. Also verify the spark by pulling the spark plugs and allowing the plugs to ground and turning the CAS by hand. I would also start doing the sensor checks and idle valve checks in service manual. Make sure the MAF tests reasonably, the intake air regulator is sane, etc. You may have to get new spark plugs.
    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...