Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sure it's nice and even but below minimum reccomended.

Safe compression is anything between 135 ~ 180psi (as per the Nissan Japan Service Manual)

Your engine is tired.... it's had a hard life and needs a refesh.

Re-coondition the block & head, new bearings and piston rings and you should be fine... budget for new pistons just in case but I suspect you may get away without them. However if you plan on putting horsepower into this engine then I suggest you put forged pistons in. Tomei make very nice 0.5mm (20 thou if you speak to any Australian engine builder) overbore pistons for the RB25. CP Pistons are an alternative if your busget isnt that high. Also don't forget to put a 1.2mm Head Gakset in if you're goin to run higher boost.

  slo33 said:
hey all, just did a compression test on my car and was curious about the readings,

1- 120

2- 119

3- 120

4- 120

5- 119

6- 119

i would just like to know all your opinions on the condition of my engine

thanks

slo33

I got my compression test done with around 130 across all cylinders. Motor seems fine, mechanics said that was a good result.

Dont pull your engine out , it looks like you ahve a good engine there .

The comp test gauge may be reading low , who did it ? if a pro did then treir gauge is reading low and they probaly know it .

If your engine was stuffed its unlikely that it would be so even , my bet is it woul vary a lot more than that , regardless if you are loosing comp from valves or rings .

Do a leak-down test if you want to be sure .

Standard comp for rb25det is 12.2kg /cm2 (about 170-175psi ) @300rpm , limit 9.2 and difference limit between cil 1 kg/cm2 .

rb25de standard comp is 12.8 kg/cm2

rb26 dett 12kg/cm2

I wouldn't say that an engine down on compression by over 30% is a good engine. Sure the gauge may be reading low and it wouldn't be a bad idea to get a test done somewhere else, however if this is the true compression of the engine then it needs a refresh.

Also an engine doesn't have to be blown up to need a re-build. If it's had a hard life but has been serviced and looked after properly then the compression test should look like this one. If something happened like a cracked ringland or dropped valve, then 1 (or more) of the cylinders would read lower than the rest for sure.

  SW20-GT said:
I wouldn't say that an engine down on compression by over 30% is a good engine. Sure the gauge may be reading low and it wouldn't be a bad idea to get a test done somewhere else, however if this is the true compression of the engine then it needs a refresh.

i doubt it would be worn like that, but anyway as an example i had a compression test done for a friends car one gauge read 160psi across first few cylinders before getting jammed, grabbed another working compression gauge it read 140psi across the cylinders.

  SW20-GT said:
I wouldn't say that an engine down on compression by over 30% is a good engine. Sure the gauge may be reading low and it wouldn't be a bad idea to get a test done somewhere else, however if this is the true compression of the engine then it needs a refresh.

I didnt say that either , what i said was "its unlikely that a worn stuffed engine would have even compression " not imposibble though just unlikely .

Old worn engines dont have so even compression on all cilinders and that leads me to believe that it may have good comp much higher than the test .

If the true comp is 120 psi on all cil that engine would be gutless in stock form with stock or near stock boost a 6 cil bommy will kill it .

Thats the reason i suggested he does a leak-down test that will prove the state of his engine .

and my car seem to run better than most other 33's, i raced another 33 with front mount, 13psi and 3" exhaust and i beat him by car lengths ( my car just had standard shitty little side mount cooler, 11 psi and 3 " exhaust) it made 240 at the tyre spretty easy though

  • 2 years later...

Just got a compression test done today theres abit of difference in the results, but overall looks pretty healthy

Dry / Wet

1. 160 / 180

2. 160 / 170

3. 150 / 170

4. 155 / 175

5. 155 / 190

6. 160 / 180

Edited by skyzaman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...