Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

I am looking into getting a FMIC for my R33 .... My car is stock barring full exhaust and air pod. I want to get the largest intercooler possible without going past the point of sacrificing performance....

I am looking at the two differnet types of HKS coolers.... One is 600x300x65 and the other is 600x300x100 ....

Can I run the larger of the two coolers without making my car more sluggish ( bearing in mind my next step is an AVC-R with boost increase ) or should I settle for the smaller of the two??

I don't want to have to swap if out later on because its not doing a good enough job but I also am not chasing a huge amount of horsepower...

Advice/Opinions welcome???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9000-intercoolers-how-big-is-too-big/
Share on other sites

I've got a 700x300x76 and found no increase in lag from a stock one.

Saying that, I think a 100mm thick core is a bit of an overkill.

60mm to 100mm thick core is a increase of 40% in volume (is that right ?? )

Go with the 60mm and save your $$$ for the AVC-R.

J

I've got a custom 700X350X75 and you can feel its adds a little lag on the standard boost. All you need to do is up the boost and you should be fine.

I only got this FMIC as it was selling cheap and I knew it had a good core, otherwise I would have gotten something a little smaller.

Best thing is to have a power goal and have a plan to get the right parts.

Just my 2 cents....

hahah at BK last Saturday with the Westside boys there was a commonwhore that had a truck intercooler. This thing was the biggest intercooler ive ever seen on my life. You could disconnect it while at the beach and use it as a surf board it was just massive.

He seemed to be getting quite abit of attention, i dont know if it was coz people thought it was fully sic or they just thought he was a knob hah.

I have no idea what size mine is but i know its large enuff (and not aligned in the middle properly arggh)

stock turbo?

Going circuit racing regularly?

If the answers are 'yes' and 'no' save your coin for something else, the stock cooler is fine.

If you must have a cooler for no other reason than everyone else has one, then get a small one that flows very slightly more than your peak power goal, with some efficiency.

If you want accelleration there are other things you can do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...