Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all.

contemplating rebuilding the old rb20 into a rb24 as the engine has terrible compression (140psi across back in jun; still pulled 288rwkw's tho :D ) and if so to go in with nice forged bits for longevity.

everyone knows to make a rb24 you use a rb26 crank with rb26 rods and tomei/custom/4agze pistons but it seems that everyone always forgets about the head.

the rb20's head isnt exactly a fluid dynamics wonder, so what can be done to improve the head flow?

also since we would be boring the snot out of the rb20 block to fit the new pistons whats to be done with head as the CC would need to be worked to suit the over bore right?

im not really familiar with this kind of stuff so i would like to learn as much as i can.

thx.

carl

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90293-rb20-rb24-head-question/
Share on other sites

well starting off you already know the RB20 head isnt the most friendly to even the 2ltr

I think the figure is 30-35% that generally is thrown about.

To get the flow required would definately require a lot of head work, not a cheap endeavour.

Im not down with all the terms but its not going to be something that small.

Cams selection is also going to play a very large part in it all i would think

This will be another great thead for sure

i'm thinking of doing this conversion, but i still need alot more infofmation before i start. i would like to know how much more response it gives, how much is a crank worth, is it necessary to go for a 33 crank for the wider oil pump drive, what inlet manifold should i use. what cam specs should i use. so far the power i have is enough to drift with but it would be alot easier with better response.

main reason im looking into it is because i want reliabilty as well as having good lowdown response.

not to mention my rb20 has seen much better days and with the 2.4 it should spool a large turbo fairly quick like.

from what i gather you should use a r33 crank because of the oil drive fix, as for intake manifold ive got a custom RIPS one so im good on that front :D .

since i was planning on building the engine to be 9k capable i was gonna run some kind of 260/270 combo or 270's.

ive already got 260 tomei procams in the car now......

Hi guys, I will try and answer the questions, but before I do I should point out that you can swap most of your good bits onto/into an RB25DET and end up with a better result than building an RB23/RB24. And it will cost a damn site less as well.

On to the questions;

The standard RB20 bore is 78 mm, the most common RB23 (2,280 cc's) piston upgrade is 4AGZE which are 81 mm (from memory). This means you will need to relieve the combustion chambers radius at the bore by 1.5. Then taper it into the normal combustion chamber shape. Pretty simple really, any machine shop could do it.

You will need to relieve the combustion chamber volume to achieve your target compression ratio. From memory about 3 cc (slightly more than a good polish) gives 8.8 to 1 for an RB23. The combustion chamber volumes will have to be equalised of course.

Porting is pretty much essential if you want to use the higher rpm effectively without huge amounts of boost. There is a lot of work on both the inlet and exhaust ports needed. If you do a really good job, you should end up around 85% of what a standard RB25 cylinder head flows.

Depending on the experience of the machinist and the workshop hourly rate you are looking at around $1K to do the above.

There are larger valves available for RB20's , I have seen 2mm larger inlet valves and 1.5 mm larger exhaut valves. I have a recollection that they were for a VG30 or CA18 but they fit the RB20. Since VG30's are popular in the US there are quite a few valve, valve spring alteratives. A quick check of the sizes should confirm the suitability.

From memory the VG30 valves where around $US20 each, so that's $640 for the set plus freight.

RB26 cranks vary considerably in price, I have seen R32GTR cranks around $400, rods around $200. Up to double that for R33GTR cranks and rods. The best suggestion I can make is to shop around the For Sale forum and check out the historic prices.

As for cams, 256 to 264's would be fine for using with the hydraulic followers (260 Poncams for example) . But to really use 272's or higher you would need to do a solid follower conversion. No, RB26 bits won't fit, well not without some serious engineering and machining. But CA18/VG30 may well fit, worth checking anyway.

By the time you have the necessary RB23/RB24 parts purchased, get it all machined and assembled you are looking at a bit over $5K. Then you have to add the accessories, manifolds, turbos etc.

Hope that was of some help

:D cheers :O

Edited by Sydneykid

and of course as usual sydney kid is on point with the info....... cheers gary!

at this point ive realized that even tho the rb24 would be loads of fun for bragging rights, it really isnt practical anymore.........

while rb25's are the better alternative they arnt as reddily available over here as they are round you guys.

not to mention we have to pay super inflated prices for stuff, thats the way of capitalism i suppose.

what i think ive decided to do is tear downt he old girl and rebuild it with slight over bore pistons to clean up the walls and get a hair more displacement (rb20.5 comes to mind :D ) and get the rods cleaned up and new bearings and gaskets with gtr pumps.

new hydro lifters and some decent springs and i should be good for a while.

besides being a student and trying to build a fast car isnt too practical atm.

thx for the info.......

  • 6 months later...

Do we know the difference in piston height between std RB20 pistons and std RB26 pistons. Have doen a search on a few piston sites and cant find the info. Before i have a go at building my proper motor, im tempted to use a bunch of second hand pieces to build a long stroke, std bore RB20 using R32 GTR crank and rods. Use std water.oil pumps etc, std RB20 pistons, perhaps with a shaved head to bump up compression to closer to between 8.7:1 and 9.0:1...

Ii dont want to go learnign expensive lesson on a motor that is coting me lost of moiney in new partds.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
    • what sort of caliper are they? If they are a slider and you gave everything a good clean, you might need to regrease the pins. My guess though is they will come good after some abuse as suggested above
    • I don't know what you should expect with an LS, but the oil pressure sounds terrible, sorry. As for the brakes, you can get fade from the pads not just the fluid, although generally that feels like a wooden block not doing anything while fluid feels like an oh shit there is no pedal so you can generally tell. What pads are you running front and rear?
    • Went over my datalogs on a whim and noticed a worrying combination of events. High RPM High Temperature Low Oil Pressure Knock Retard I bought some 10w-60 because I actually think this will be better going forward given track temp is 125C and 10-40 will actually be thinner in those environments. I know I had a leak but it's not entirely sure how much pressure loss can be attributed to that. The knock retard does correlate with all of the above. When it's not present oil pressure is higher. And by 'low' I mean at 6800 RPM the oil pressure was recorded as low as ~35psi pretty constantly. Which is obviously very not good. I'm hoping that thicker oil that ISNT LEAKING will result in a bit more pressure when I need it. Also in the last session I got a very spongy break pedal. I bled the lines as the car is on jack stand right now with the wheels off and I noticed... no air in the lines? Maybe the tiniest bit of tiny frothy bubbles for the first 0.1 seconds of bleeding the whole car? The breaks did come back to me after I backed off (and felt fine driving normally). Doesn't appear to be any leaks anywhere that I can see. Any thoughts on that?
    • Solution, run shitter tyres. Let wheel spin be your weak link 😛
×
×
  • Create New...