Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think from more of a performance to $$ point of view.

Same here ;) Its all about research for me as turbos (in my eyes) are harder to understand....

I understand about the turbine side gains theory...As a wise man once said :

"Exhaust is the propulsion side, smaller A/R will provide greater restriction to flow due to higher velocity to exhaust

charge which imparts drive to the turbine blades. Compressor side is more an indicator of the overall efficiency island of the compressor."

What id really like to know is what exactly would be the difference in using the different size compressor covers. Its always going to come down to trial and error i suppose....and cost :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1643745
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Just to throw a spanner in the works.

I went for a little drive to quieten down the bubs tonight.

I saw an XR6 booting it along off sets of lights, surprisingly it looked a little laggy, sure it had plenty of boost transition torque/acceleration due to the 4ltr but lag is lag. :|

Has made me think about stepping back to the GT30 -12 VG30 Hybrid.

There's a couple ppls bolting this setup on to their rb25's soon, hopefully the results are all consistent, 270-280rwkw. If so, that will be fine for me.

Will have to get my self some decent tyres and suspension/diff setup to get the mid range stump pulling power to the ground.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1643888
Share on other sites

Hey cubes,

what would you class as lag? the reason i ask is i think the gt30 with .63 rear will be absolutely tiny on your rb30.

I run an old HKS T300s kit with .63 rear and T04s/.7 front, plain bearing (the wheels look identical to the current crop of GT30 turbos) on my 25 and have full boost (atm 17psi) by 3100 rpm and this is without the benefit of ball bearing centres. I'd have thought the next size up on the exhaust would be beneficial on the 3lt as you would free up the exhaust and be able to make some pretty good power without the need for stupid amounts of boost.

Interesting reading about the different comp cover configuations, funnily enough there was little difference between the WOT performance of my old highflow vs the t300s at the same boost level, they even acheived full boost at the same time (which was 14psi until i had the car on the dyno with the new setup) the t300s was within 5rwkw of the highflow at that point. Transient response at light throttle was completely different, the highflow shat all over the HKS (probably to do with the ball bearing core)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1643941
Share on other sites

I think he means the GT30 CHRA with the vg30 exhaust (which is about ~0.7 ar)

Anyways, i think the 0.6 front on the GT35r will still be the best setup for me. If it cracks just over 300rwkw, then im happy ;)....at the slight cost of getting the turbo setup the way i want :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1643995
Share on other sites

BHDave, The GT30 vg30 hybrid kicks you in the arse at around 3800-4000rpm on an rb25, drop 500-600rpmf if its bolted on the side of a rb30. :)

By lag I mean it didn't start screaming to what sounded like 3500-4000rpm when idling off the line, it seemed ok once rolling, just off the line in the lower gears she sounds a little laggy.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644109
Share on other sites

Cubes if your not sure wait for some results . Your own experience shows what happens when the restrictions were removed from the exhaust side . If it makes you feel any better I know of one RB30DET that uses a GT3540R that has the compressor side of a GT42R grafted into it (102mm comp wheel) and it spools at around 33-3400 rpm .

The F'n Orrible Rusty Device is a late emission engine with drive by wire throttle and all sorts of torque limiting devices . Your R32 (probably 400 Kg lighter) and tuned for performance should eat it .

By the way have you put taller rear gears in it yet , that should make it feel better .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644506
Share on other sites

Just to throw a spanner in the works.

I went for a little drive to quieten down the bubs tonight.

I saw an XR6 booting it along off sets of lights, surprisingly it looked a little laggy, sure it had plenty of boost transition torque/acceleration due to the 4ltr but lag is lag. :|

The XR6t doesnt even feel like its making boost man. Its the design, torque and weight (among other things) of the car itself.

A mate of mine has one and you couldnt tell if it was on or off boost. Even thats its turbo to be honest. There is no kick at all, no rush onto boost

Remember they are only running 5psi or whatever, the turbo is basically hanging on for the ride. Its not doing anything remotely interesting.

The exhaust noise etc isnt much to go by.

You cant call it "lag" well... totally depends on your definition i guess

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644538
Share on other sites

The compressor cover a/r will have absolutely no influence on lag, how can it ? It is only the cover around the wheel, it cannot influence how fast the wheel accelerates. Lag is all due to the turbine end.

Second point, compressor a/r changes the shape of the flow map. Small a/r covers give a tall skinny compressor flow map that leans to the right. Ideal for very high boost small engines.

Large a/r covers give a fat round looking flow map, with big flow numbers at lower boost levels. Ideal for big cube engines running low boost.

Take two engines both producing 350Kw, one is a five litre V8 in a boat running low boost. The other is a two litre high Rpm high boost race engine. Both make 350Kw, both have identical airflow, one runs about five times the boost pressure of the other.

The two litre engine will have small a/r turbine cover, and small a/r compressor cover. The V8 will run large a/r covers at both ends.

Small a/r is for high pressures, skinny passages, high air velocities.

Big a/r is massive flow, low pressures, and low air velocities.

That is the general way it works at BOTH ends of the turbo.

In this example both engines are 350Kw, same airflow, same turbo, radically different turbo Rpm and pressure ratios.

Edited by Warpspeed
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644705
Share on other sites

R31 Nismoid,

The XR6 was definitely not stock. :)

It had a rather loud exhaust, twin tips out the rear, Orange colour with big white stripes painted down the middle of the car, very much lowered on 18" wheels. It went hard there's no doubt about that.

It easily cleaned up a VY II Exec V8 that was caming over with a nice lope.

When it launched it didn't get up on boost straight away, it took roughly half way across the lights for it to really kick hard, and begin struggling for traction.

It was definitely not a linear boost build on the xr6, it seemed as if it was going hard then all of a sudden it would kick hard and scream off.

With regards to warpspeeds comments, I guess some times I mistake lag for response. :)

As I understand it, you do nothing else but use a larger compressor a/r and you will reduce response.

I'm still getting my head around turbo comp and turbine matching etc.. :P

The XR6 boys with the stock turbo are running up to around 385rwkw on the stock .5 comp cover. Thats pretty much where it ends for the stock xr6 turbo, thats when they look at upgrading.

Generally to a T66 wheel of some sort and push 400rwkw+.

Now knowing this I wouldn't even look at the larger comp cover.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644727
Share on other sites

There is a section in Hugh M's book on turbocharging that describes the workings of the comp cover . My understanding is that it sort of the reverse of the turbine and exhaust housing . Its about converting high velocity to high pressure without turbulence in the diffuser . I think its safe to assume that the larger the AR the lower the gas speed will be for a given mass flow .

More tomorrow cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1644974
Share on other sites

There is a section in Hugh M's book on turbocharging that describes the workings of the comp cover . My understanding is that it sort of the reverse of the turbine and exhaust housing . Its about converting high velocity to high pressure without turbulence in the diffuser . I think its safe to assume that the larger the AR the lower the gas speed will be for a given mass flow .

More tomorrow cheers  A .

Spot on discopotato.

The compressor cover should not really effect lag, but it possibly might if the compressor was forced to work in a really low efficiency part of the flow map during spoolup.

There may be less boost and less exhaust flow and much poorer spooling if the cover is totally wrong for the engine.

Think of the cover as a long gradually tapered pipe section that matches the wheel to the engine. For any given compressor tip speed and engine boost/airflow combination, there is an optimum taper angle or ratio of inlet size to outlet size.

As disco says, it is like the turbine cover, but in reverse.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645429
Share on other sites

So how does a large comp cover affect the power delivery and overall feel?

Would it be correct to assume a larger comp cover will give the feel that you require more throttle to have the same acceleration? Given nothing but the comp cover has been changed.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645524
Share on other sites

Quote :

Compressor Design .

The centrifugal compressor consists of three elements which must be matched to each other for optimum efficiency :

The impeller , the diffuser and the housing .

The compressor impeller rotates at very high speeds and accelerates the gas passing through it to a high velocity by centrifugal force .

The diffuser acts as a nozzle in reverse , slowing the gas down without turbulence . This causes it to increase in pressure and , unfortunately , in temperature .

The housing around the diffuser is used to collect this high pressure gas and direct it to wherever it is used .

He also goes on to mention static and total pressures , a static probe into a compressor cover is not affected by the velocity of the gas . A total pressure probe measures the static pressure plus the velocity pressure of the gas .

A static pressure tap could be a hole drilled at 90 deg to the direction of flow through the housing eg waste gate actuator pressure supply .

A total pressure tap could look like a small "L" shaped tube with its hole facing the direction of the moving gas . In this book its called a pitot tube . Aircraft use them in the wings leading edge I believe to measure air speed which differs to ground speed .

So my understanding of the real world comp cover ARR is that because of the larger passage size of the higher ratios all else being the same the gas speed will be lower out of the cover .

I reckon a set volume of gas moving at a higher velocity has to benefit our humble piston pump (engine) more than the same volume at slower speeds .

With the Foulcoon Ford were not looking for really high performance so for the lowish boost pressure (4-6) , the GT40 compressor is not working very hard and compressor efficiency does not need to be brilliant at the flow rate required . The GT40 82mm compressor is usually found in T04S covers and back plates but I think its the larger diffuser area from the "S" cover and back plate that becomes critical at higher boost pressures . It would be interesting to know if Garrett make smaller ie .60 , .50 ARR T04S comp covers for the 82mm 56T GT40 compressor . That way you could get the best of both worlds ie the larger diffuser area and some control of the cover velocity to get decent total pressure .

If you look at the specs of the GT40R it uses a fifty something ARR comp cover but I think its for an 88mm compressor - more searching needed .

In Corky Bells book Maximum Boost he quotes some figures for gas speeds that he feels should not be exceeded for exhaust and inlet air , I don't have time to find it now but maybe later .

Please do not take my ramblings as gospel as its only my current thoughts and not based on experience .

Cheers Adrian .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645579
Share on other sites

Yup, Disco, that is a pretty good explanation.

A low boost setup only needs low compressor Rpm and tip speed, so velocities everywhere will be much lower, wheel, diffuser, and housing.

High boost requires the turbo to spin much faster, tip speeds will be up, and so will velocities.

Cubes, if the housing is all wrong, boost will be down, and turbo discharge temperatures will be higher. It is an efficiency thing.

Which would make more acceleration, 10 psi boost at 180C or 12psi boost at 150C coming out of the compressor at identical compressor Rpm ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645624
Share on other sites

How is it possible to gain airflow potential at higher pm's and not loose response/airflow velocity at lower rpms?

Similiar to using 3.5" IC piping or running an IC that is too large for the application.

General driving conditions it will tend to make all its boost a little later yet on the dyno it will make all its boost at basically the same rpm, as there is time to fill the void so to speak.

Obviously a .7 comp cover is still very small compared to the area of an ic/ic piping. Bad example but hope it makes sense.

Once again I worded my question badly. :O

Here it goes again.

I'm interested in the transition period from zero vacuum to the set boost level. How will the larger comp cover affect this? Will it feel more linear as a result less responsive?

I should bolt the smaller RB20DET comp cover on to my VG30DET turbo (exactly the same compressor wheel between the two) and see how it directly affects the power delivery.

If my middle name was moneybags and not unibum I would spend $70 and have a before/after boost trace on the local dyno.

argg.. :)

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645650
Share on other sites

I'd say the largest ARR cover will offer the lowest gas speed for a given wheel speed . The lower ARR covers will pull the optimum gas speed down the compressors flow and speed range .

I was asking a fellow who used to do lots of custom turbo work years ago about this , he said the larger ARR covers make the turbo hit hard when the gas speed gets up where the lower ARR ones tend to be more progressive .

Note HKS's GT3037's , the 52 trim version uses a .50ARR cover , the 56 trim version uses a .60 . I'm guessing the gas speed is similar but the ARR goes up with the higher flowing 56T because of the greater mass flow .

In my perfect world I want the 50T GT40 82mm wheel with a T04S .50 ARR cover because I think it would put the ideal air speed where in the engines speed range I want it , not where a 6L GM/Detroit or whatever needed it to be . Sadly HKS (they optimize things for petrol engines) didn't option a GT3540R . I basically want the same sort of result that WilliamsF1 got but with 3.1L and one turbo .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645856
Share on other sites

I just had a quick look at the HKS GT3040 which uses the 50T 82mm GT40 compressor in a .60 ARR cover (quoted as 500 PS) unlike the Garrett GT3540R with its 56T comp and .70ARR cover . On ya HKS , free development work through online specs - I like it .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1645866
Share on other sites

I am not a real turbo whiz, so I need some advice from you gurus ;)

I am thinking about strapping a turbo to my R34. For a relatively stock RB25DET with the following mods:

Apexi Power Intake in a partition

Manual boost/bleed valve

Apexi SAFCII

Apexi Exhaust Control Valve

Jasma Cat-back zorst

Split front/dump pipe (from Batmbl)

Catco high-flow cat

No intercooler

Standard fuel system

I am thinking about getting a Garrett T3 T04E internal wastegate turbo with T3 flange. Not sure of the a/rs yet, but will post tomorrow. The seller says I will get an easy 210rwkw at low boost with no aftermarket ecu, or 250rwkw with some tuning. Obviously without a/rs it is hard for you all to say, but am I on the right track with my enquiries so far? Obviously with standard fuel system I am not going to boost at over say 12psi, but may get a Sard rising rate fuel reg. if necessary.

Ideas/comments? I am not after crazy numbers, and want the car to be VERY streetable and lag-free. Is this the right sort of setup, or am I miles off track? Thanks for any advice!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90432-xr6-gt35r/page/2/#findComment-1664568
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...