Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Intake Plenum change


Recommended Posts

I'm puzzling over the best way to configure my RB25DET with a FMIC. I have assumed the best solution for airflow/lag reasons would be to position the throttle body at the front of the intake plenum to keep the return pipe length short and need some advice before i waste my time and money.

1. If i don't put the throttle body at the front of the plenum i will have to run the return intercooler pipe back along the length of the FMIC, up along the side of the engine and over the top to the standard throttle body position - this will introduce lag/air pressure restrictions won't it?

2. Cut/Shut existing plenum to position throttle body at the front. I was quoted $650.

3. Upgrade to custom plenum but then worry about added costs for fuel rails and injectors. Provides a good opportunity to upgrade injectors. Plenum $650-1000??, injectors and rail $1000+??

4. Will an RB26DETT plenum bolt up to the rb25? This would solve all my problems but i'm guessing no because I've never seen it done?

Anyone with comments please post up or suggest other options or contacts/workshops i could speak to about this.

Thanks,

Wegs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9113-rb25det-intake-plenum-change/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

unless your power goal is over 500 hp jsut keep the stock intake with the return there are people onhere makig well over 300 rwkw with the standard intake.

you money would be better spent else where

my cooler has is built with a return pipe under neath which is much better

meggala

Thanks meggala - I assume if i got hold of a rb26 plenum it wouldn't be a straight fit.

Extra power wasn't the driving force behind this idea - i want a responsive 250rwkw when i'm finished. Because i'll need to upgrade injectors at a later stage i wanted to consider all my options. I agree i'd rather save money for other areas which will show results provided i don't suffer from long piping. How did you find your turbo response after your FMIC upgrade?

Do you know anyone local (Melb) to supply the intercooler with pipe modification like yours? I won't accept dodgy tanks or core.

I have a Greddy plenum, cost $1500, and a mate of mine had his throttle body moved to the front of the plenum. Both of these options work perfectly well, but unless your after big power, like we are, then money is better spent elsewhere. These different plenum designs certainly reduced the amount of pipework and bends, reduce intake air heating etc, but it will all depend on what your end goal is to determine whether it is money well spent.

See'ya:burnout:

yeah mine is a race radiators one the tanks are flowed they are a great cooler my car only has an r33 turbo and cooler )its a r32 It has run a 14 flat with more in there so the cooler works very well I'm happy full boost by 3200 rpm its a good set up my site has other pics of my cooler int~~~

If you need to get an aftermarket intercooler then make the pipes as short as you can. If that means a plenum change, then if you have the cash go do it. Provided the throttle body size is kept stockish it should provide good throttle response and a nice fat power band.

The RB26 plenum won't fit straight up. It requires extensive machining. On top of that the multiple throttle body design is a son of a bitch to get right again if the linkages are moved and have not been marked.

this might sound stupid but couldnt you just take the rb25det plenum to somewhere that does alloy welding and get them to cut and relocate the throt body to the front and weld a plate where the throt body used to be ... it wouldnt cost 1/4 of the price ....

or is there more to it than that .. ie plenum internals ...

Thing to remeber is that you could pick up a set of 550cc top feed high impedence injectors, to go with the new plenum for $400-$500. The fuel rail might cost up to (tops) $200.

Side feed injectors generally are alot more expensive, expect to pay another $500+ for a set.

Sub Zero manufacture a plenum used on their 9sec GTST, it flows well and costs about $1400 and comes with a fuel rail and (I think) a throttle body. Add the cost of buying some injectors, then subtract the cost of selling your old injectors and plenum (if anyone wants to buy the plenum), and the cost of upgrading comes down to a few hundred dollars difference - in theory.

Some food for though

Steve

Doctor,

I know some people that used that design and they haven't had any issues as of yet. It was thought that with the internal baffles that the turbulance might cause some issues, but so far no problems. Sub-zero have used this design to good effect, so if your after a cheaper way out of redisigning your plenum then I think it is a good approach.

See'ya:burnout:

Ok, some very good feedback thanks people...it looks like the cheapest solution is to cut/shut the existing plenum.

Now to throw a spanner in the works....

I intend on changing my dump pipe and injectors down the track. The following thought comes to mind.

What if i use the full top end from an RB26dett?

1. Does it fit?

2. Assuming i can source a top end or blown bottom end complete engine, how much would i have to allow $$$ before labour?

3. Upgrades plenum, injectors, addition of twin turbo.

4. Need to modify dump pipe (easy)

5. Need new head gasket(how much $$?)

6. Could i bolt the head straight on or would it need to be reconditioned?

7. Any show stoppers that i've left out?

You can add the RB26 head to the RB25 bottom end, with only some minor changes necessary, but in my opinion I wouldn't bother unless you do a whole RB26 transplant. If your after big power then choose and RB26 engine or do an RB30 with RB25 head. The amount of money to do this could make the RB25 go very hard, so I'd suggest saving your money for that.

See'ya:burnout:

There are alot of local manufacturers starting to make inlet plenums at the moment, I know of 5 different people here in Perth, one is even making it out of carbon fibre. I'm not sure if any research into airflow goes into these designs, but even the cut&shut standard plenum gave a substantial increase in power to my mates car.

See'ya:burnout:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...