Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Intake Plenum change


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, we have used a Sub Zero plenum on an RB25 head. It replaces only the top half of the inlet manifold, so the standard injectors, rail wiring harness etc all remain in situ. Cost was around $1,400 complete with a 65 mm throttle body.

The RB26 inlet manifold, multiple throttle bodies and inlet plenum don't fit the RB25 head. An adaptor is need for the bolts and water feed to fit. Very tricky to machine out of billet aluminium and really only worth it if you want the multiple throttle bodies for better response. No extra horepower over the Sub Zero style.

If you want the extra response, go to the full RB26 top end.

I saw a RB25DET with the standard inlet manifold and throttle body make 360 rwkw a couple of weeks ago. So I don't believe the longer pipework is a big an issue as it is made out to be. The Gibson R31 GTSR made 460 bhp and it had the standard RB20DET manifold.

Mathematics tells me that the pipe length is not that much of a problem, but pipe diameter can be. I subscribe to the theory that larger diameter pipework contributes to poor throttle response because it lowers the velocity of the air flow. If you measure 2.5" pipework on the flow bench at - 2 bar it shows no resistance at all at flows up to 700 lbs per minute. This is enough airflow for 650 bhp. If you were targeting more BHP than that, then maybe larger diameter pipework would be worthwhile.

Hope that made sense.

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi wegs.

I have been thinking about this myself. My idea is to try and pick up a cheap (needs rebuild) RB26DETT, these sometimes go for $3,000. If you are lucky the valves and guides are not too bad, and you can put the whole top end onto your RB25.

You can then sell your RB25DET top end + turbo complete, to one of the Commodore guys, You should be able to recoup a decent chunk of that original $3000 outlay.

Likewise with the twin turbos, use them as is, rebuild them, or flog them off, and get something better. If you do the sums, it will almost certainly give you best bang for your buck over the long run.

The advantages of keeping the same RB25 bottom end are the engine number stays the same, and there are no sump related problems, and its a lot less work.

You may even be able to sell the complete RB26 botom end to someone else as well. Or else keep it for a long term future rebuild, and further upgrade.

  • 3 weeks later...

Someone earlier siad that he got quoted $650 for a cut & shut on the rb25det plenum. My question is, is there more to this job than simply moving the throt body to the front and patching the hole, like maybe something internal ?

Cos if it is just as simple as moving the throt body and patching the hole then you could take it to any welding place and probably get this done for $100 MAX ...

Brendanf, thats a nice looking plenum. Do you know if they are using the stock runners? Also do you know if the runners are continued inside the plenum or just butt up against the base and inside is a big void? Sorry lots of quesions, but I am intested to know what different shops provide.

Cheers

Steve

EDIT: did they give you any, or have any flow figures?:)

I understand that the bottom of the std plenumn is chopped off and the new higher voluetric plenum is attached via argon assisted aluminum welding. The fuel rails and injectors are all std (expecpt mine are hi flowed)

Hi Brendanf,

You will be pleased to know Mark quoted an extra 95cfm flow per cylinder from these plenums on a flow bench. They do consturct a bell mouth inside the pleunum that fits against the runners to achieve this, as just bolting them straight up would not be doing any favours. And they all flow evenly, which is also pretty important. Mark states that they put in a bit of R&D to achieve this - which doesnt surprise me considering the results.

All this for $895 fitted, and for an extra $200 will fit an 80mm throttle body. This has to be close to the bargain of the century - I'm getting one!

Thanks for pointing Hills motorsport out - saved me hundreds

Coolies Steve, ya know I was round at Hills Yesterday and I forgot to ask the questions..... Well you have now which is great. (You sound like you know what your talking about more than me anyhow)

Cheers,

  • 3 weeks later...
Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

I have a Greddy plenum, cost $1500, and a mate of mine had his throttle body moved to the front of the plenum.

GTS-t VSPEC, do you know where your friend got his cut'n'shut done or if he had it tested for even flow? I'd be interested in pics (or seeing it in person). I'm in the process of doing something similar, so first hand feedback would be great.

Does the rb26dett head fit rb20det bottom end too, or not?

Also I have simply wrapped my intake from plenum to intercooler outlet in insulation and the heat soak was measurably different. (Looks dodgy but...) Even before I put the thermometer on it the pipe stays cold with the insultion but without it is quite hot to touch. Cheap way to earn a few measly Kw. Has anyone else done this...I thought it was a pretty cheap obvious thing to try.

Does someone have the contact details for where sub zero intakes are sold.

Cheers,

Russ

Guest MFX_R33

I got my plenum from MOOD Motorsport. Still retains the factory injector's etc, but it does do away with the factroy idle control, etc, so it required an aftermarket ECU (in my case an EMS from Hills). This cost me $750 including the XF throttle body, and Moods welding is flawless!

prgen.jpg

Jeff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...