Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Minh, thanks for organising another awesome night, apart from having a slightly bruised back from the carts I had a 'ken ball!

Looking forward to the next one, oh and Mario.... dont forget... "RRAAAGGGGEEEEEE" :lol:

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest ManNGolf

Hi guys....was nice to meet up with such a friendly easy going bunch of hoons.....hehehe jk!

a perfect score of 10/10 for degree of difficulty and execution for the bloke that pulled off the one handed drift with the carts....and a not so perfect 10 for the other guy who had go and ended up going abit more sideways than what he intended.

oh yeh, now we have confirmation that whilst women drivers dont drive well.............they certainly know how to put a guys hip out by T-Boning him in spectacular style...........hahahhahah (oh yeh no disrescpect if her bf is on here........kakkaka).

I was abit tired by midnight so headed home.

ryan: um yeh digi cams come with a flash too.........hehhehehe but a job well young skaaailine'walker.

Thanks for the great night guys :)

Go-Karting was an absolute ball!! especially the one handed westside drifts around the last corner!! The only down side of it was one Michael Schumacher wannabe trying to run me off the damn track!!!

RAAAAAAAAAGEEE :lol: :lol:

Man'n'golf - I was using time exposure to substitute for the flash.. It actually comes out alot darker with the flash for pics of things more than about 1 meter away!

I saw you giving your golf some after we left EC -- nice nice.. goes along quite well!

Please don't post up the pic from BK.. Please.. I have a feeling i'm not looking too good in it. Waiiiiit a minute, when do i ever look good?! Post away.. =)

And it ain't Mario on the seat being a bum.. It's Kabab! Jeez..

still no sleep -----rrrrrraaagggggeeeeee.......(whitney houston special)

starting to see two of everything , It was a good night had by all this probably has to be one of the biggest turn outs that ive been to. one more thing (hey nick & donnie im pretty sure that the impeller blades from that turbo are plastic and then foil tipped) ..rrrrrrrraaaagggggeeeeeeeee!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...