Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, well, as my conversion is coming closer and closer, i have been thinking about launches etc.

In the auto, stalling it up, i cant get any wheelspin off the line OR between gear changes. For an autobox, this is about normal.

The other day, drove my friends WRP10. Sat at the lights, ~3500, drop the clutch, spun some of first and chirpped into second. Anyway, then we were talking about it and he said that his car wouldnt be able to break any traction if it was auto either.

So, onto my question

For the fellas with manuals, whats the wheel spin like with a medium (~3500) launch and on hard shifts 1->2 can you get wheel spin/chirps?

If you can/cant, post what mods you have so i can get an idea of what i should expect.

Cheers,

Alex

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/92907-manual-launches-in-stageas/
Share on other sites

Ok, well, as my conversion is coming closer and closer, i have been thinking about launches etc.

In the auto, stalling it up, i cant get any wheelspin off the line OR between gear changes. For an autobox, this is about normal.

The other day, drove my friends WRP10. Sat at the lights, ~3500, drop the clutch, spun some of first and chirpped into second. Anyway, then we were talking about it and he said that his car wouldnt be able to break any traction if it was auto either.

So, onto my question

For the fellas with manuals, whats the wheel spin like with a medium (~3500) launch and on hard shifts 1->2 can you get wheel spin/chirps?

If you can/cant, post what mods you have so i can get an idea of what i should expect.

Cheers,

Alex

ok mines manual and i know its 26 but still, a manual is alot more viscous on takeoff, as autos slip the gearbox off the line (like slipping a clutch in a manual) so it never impacts solidly on the wheels, and i can imagine with a decent clutch due to the 1800kg weight and rb25 it would still spin on launch for sure if u gave it some revs, and even on 1st-2nd changes, i had the rb25 from the stagea in the vl with a manual and stock as a rock and it went bloody hard (unfair comparision as vl weighs around 1450kg).

Manual will feel faster cause it throws ya back in the seat on gearchanges, just dont give it too much off the lights as my axle snapped just coming onto boost in first gear as it reached redline. But the main prob with the stagea was it doesnt have LSD rear diff so all the cars weight (it was in 2wd only when it broke) was driving through that one axle (twig :D )

Should change the car totally with the manual, i cant stand autos trust me :(

Yes well I learnt the hard way that when 4 wheels spin, the car lurches in whichever direction the road is sloping in :D well at least that is what has happened to me, both times in the wet though.

I have a GTR diff though, but still, in the dry anything above ~4.5k rpm the front really starts to move around a bit, but in the wet, it truely is an amazing feeling when all for spin, cant quite explain it.

In the dry I can chirp 2nd and 3rd, in the wet I can spin through 2nd, have not tried 3rd, havent got the balls yet ;)

BASTARDS!

Ill be there soon, urgh, autos piss me off :D

Only a matter of time now...

But that info sounds very good, very promising and something that ill look forward too.

Chances are i should upgrade the diff at the same time i beleive, as the PFC/power mods etc will all be going in at the same time, so a brisk jump in power and a manual wont make the car love me much...

Hmm, I haven't taken the chance of doing a hard launch off the line yet, because I don't want to be breaking any driveshafts this early in my ownership experience (and because I don't yet have the money to replace anything).

But, seeing as my car has had a six-puck clutch installed when the conversion was done, it's kinda hard to "ease" in the clutch in on gear changes when you're hard-charging. I'm still getting used to it, which doesn't help.

But to answer part of the question, then yes, it will chirp on changes into second and third gears.

And my car is standard apart from the R-32 GT-R gearbox, the aforementioned clutch and a 3" cat-back exhaust.

Cheers,

Nick T.

I reckon if I raced an auto with the same power, the auto would win, easier to get off the line without wheelspin and faster gear changes.

But anyone could beat me, everytime I went to the drags in my old r33 all I ever ended up doing was wheelspinning, :D I is teh suck at drag racing :(

I dont know, for some reason i cant see an auto winning until some serious (200+) power is reached

What i find with the stagea, with the auto is that it bogs down between 2500-4000. I presume with the manual, depending how hard i laucnh, i could probably end the wheel spin around 3500 and that would be perfect

But i think the issue i am seeing is more a matter of my car being standard tuned.

I dont know, for some reason i cant see an auto winning until some serious (200+) power is reached

What i find with the stagea, with the auto is that it bogs down between 2500-4000. I presume with the manual, depending how hard i laucnh, i could probably end the wheel spin around 3500 and that would be perfect

But i think the issue i am seeing is more a matter of my car being standard tuned.

The reason I ask is we have an R34GTT manual with 265 rwkw that does 11.9 at 120 mph and the Stagea is faster on the average street, up to the speed limit (110 kph). The Stagea pulls away until the R34GTT gets is power to the ground, stops wheelspinning, which is all of 1st gear and about 2/3 of second gear. The Stagea has around 150-160 4wkw at the moment judging by its feel. So when it has 200 4wkw it is just going to be that much harder to beat.

I can launch the Stage with 0.7 bar of boost by simply holding it against the torque converter. Then just slide the left foot off the brake, no wheelspin and it never gets under the the 0.7 bar. There is no way that the manual will ever do that, and the auto is so stealth, no noise, no rev, rev, rev, dump, wheelspin. Just see ya ......

:) cheers :)

The reason I ask is we have an R34GTT manual with 265 rwkw that does 11.9 at 120 mph and the Stagea is faster on the average street, up to the speed limit (110 kph).  The Stagea pulls away until the R34GTT gets is power to the ground, stops wheelspinning, which is all of 1st gear and about 2/3 of second gear.  The Stagea has around 150-160 4wkw at the moment judging by its feel.  So when it has 200 4wkw it is just going to be that much harder to beat.

I can launch the Stage with 0.7 bar of boost by simply holding it against the torque converter.  Then just slide the left foot off the brake, no wheelspin and it never gets under the the 0.7 bar.  There is no way that the manual will ever do that, and the auto is so stealth, no noise, no rev, rev, rev, dump, wheelspin.  Just see ya ......

:) cheers :mellow:

but ya get to change gears :)

and droping the clutch in 4wd wouldnt spin bugger all would it? considering the attessa is similiar to r33/34 models?

honestly i ran mine in 2wd only and with 350rwhp it hardly wheelspins compared to normal 2wd cars (e.g. VL) which i could spin anytime over 120kmh or so it would just kick out, but the stagea is a really grippy in comparision, even from lights leaving at 3k rpm it would spin and then scramble for grip for the first 10 metres and then its traction :D

I have 288kW at all wheels in mine. At 3,000 RPM launch the tyres lose traction for literally a fraction of a second (they "chirp", but that's it) then it's grip all the way. I have 275/35 R18 Goodyear GSD3's all round. No loss of grip on gear changes ever, and I am currently running 1.3 bar.

The fun will start in a few weeks when the T51R goes on... :)

I have 288kW at all wheels in mine. At 3,000 RPM launch the tyres lose traction for literally a fraction of a second (they "chirp", but that's it) then it's grip all the way. I have 275/35 R18 Goodyear GSD3's all round. No loss of grip on gear changes ever, and I am currently running 1.3 bar.

The fun will start in a few weeks when the T51R goes on... :P

nice, u got a gtr rear end and axles? cause i think u will need it soon enough :angry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...