Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok was going to run my cold air intake through one of the stock intercooler holes when I got my front mount cooler but the pipes for the one that I got still go down through the standard intercooler holes. So....

What is the best way to get a good cold air feed? Can another hole be cut near where the intercooler piping goes? Is there another way to get the air in there? What has everyone else done on their cars?

Thanks

Zer0

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/935-cold-air-intake-on-r33/
Share on other sites

I cut mine on the inner guard. The vertical bit right in front of the air filter. It leads into the inner guard and only gets fresh air.

The only problem with this is that the air isn't forced into it, it has to suck through it (if that makes sense??)

J

that's what I did to mine ,you get quite good airflow through there. You could close off btween the inner and outer guard around the wheel side of the cutout that might pressurise it a bit.

I still have the stock inlet in place except I swapped it for a GTR one. Eventually it will be sealed into the top of the cold box

Has any one thought about a different air box from a different car and then plumb a cold air intake in to that?

Apparently the Skyline Airbox is pretty bad for airflow which is partly to blame for its style of intake which is a bell mouth.

Apparently according to autospeed the VS V8 cold air intake without the snout is the best flowing airbox up to the date of the test around.

I am going to look in to it as I don't want a pod filter showing.

Another way that I thought of is to use the std air box as a dummy remove the filter inside and adapt a type of mandrel pipe or silicon hose and then mount the pod filter high up in the inner guard.?!?!?

It would still look like a std air box just with piping on the inside which runs to the inner guard where a pod filter sits.

Might get a bit wet but... maybe make up a few little baffels or somthing..

i got the best way ..... Remove the left headlight !! ...

but seriously there is lots of placs you can feed air from.

What im goin to do (when i get off my ass) is cut a hole beside the ic piping hole somewhere and make up a tube that will take air from the bottom left of front bumper ( end will be flared) and go through the hold and finish with another flared end near the ram pod ..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...