Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello All

I have a 1995 GTS-t RB25DET Auto

with th following mods

3'' full exhaust with dump pipe

GCG 450hp Hi flow Turbo

Pod Filter

Hybrid FMIC

Splitfire Coils

FCD

10 PSi Boost

18 degrees timing

My tuner cant seem to get much more then 210hp at the wheels

my ecu is doing the Rich and Retard thing its driving me nuts

What is my options for a ECU for the AUTO or do i go for a full ecu and do a manual conversion.

I would prefer to keep the Auto cause its nice to drive (my missus has to drive it too....with kids....)

I was hoping with startard injectors to hit 250-300hp at the wheels

but it seems that the damm ecu wont let me.

I have been searching the forums for weeks trying to find a clear cut answer to no avail.

Guys i know someone out there can help me

no matter what it still has to retain drivibilty.

HELLLLLLLLLLLLP!

Champ get a compresion test some thing is wrong

i get 242rwhp @ 8psi

mods i have

3' exhaust with hiflow cat hiflow turbo

pod

fmic with plumb back

eboost 2 at 10psi 250rwhp all day

tho my dyno guy was very suprised

you need a g reddy e manage with ignision harnes there is a good thread on hear

james

Champ get a compresion test some thing is wrong

i get 242rwhp @ 8psi

mods i have

3' exhaust with hiflow cat hiflow turbo

pod

fmic with plumb back

eboost 2 at 10psi 250rwhp all day

tho my dyno guy was very suprised

you need a g reddy e manage with ignision harnes there is a good thread on hear

james

sorry wrong message quoted.

Can you point me to that thread mate I cant find much with the search funtionalty

cheers

Speak to a guy on these forums called toshi

He remaps rb25 ecu's. This means he will write a new map for your standard computer so you will retain factory auto settings.

cost is something like $300 + dyno time from memory :blink:

he has done heaps of ECUs and knows what he is doing

Cheers:)

PMDW

some thing is wrong with your dyno results

they are soo low i hav less mods than you and push wat you are after without an ecu auto as well that is y your thread interests me

was the car in second gear wen dynoed?

is it serviced much?

is it a good operater?

how long have you had it?

james

james

he is running a bigger turbo... there is probably nothing wrong at all.

@ 10psi his bigger turbo is more than likely moving more air, spinning out the ECU more than yours.

I wouldnt worry about the figure at all.

Get an SAF-C II onto it and go from there

R31Nismoid

Dont you think 210HP not KW is a little low for the mods he has

and will a bigger turbo lower the over all HP

I thought they just lagged more

210 hp =150 kw @rw

sorry i think some thing is up with that

james

he is running a bigger turbo... there is probably nothing wrong at all.

@ 10psi his bigger turbo is more than likely moving more air, spinning out the ECU more than yours.

I wouldnt worry about the figure at all.

Get an SAF-C II onto it and go from there

Actually you are right on the money the more airflow is maxing out the ECU

I have pretty much decided to get my factory ECU remapped when the nismo injectors turn up that way i dont have to dick around with splicing looms and such and everything will work smiko i'm hoping for 230 to 240 rwkw fingers crossed and it will still look factory i'll keep everyone posted.

Thanks for pointing me to that e-manage thread mad34 and the factory ECU IS the way to go.CEF11E cheers mate its gunna save a lot of heartache

R31Nismoid

Dont you think 210HP not KW is a little low for the mods he has

and will a bigger turbo lower the over all HP

I thought they just lagged more

210 hp =150 kw @rw

sorry i think some thing is up with that

james

Miller, the stock ecu sucks, they are not all equal.

Nothing is wrong with his car.

plus its auto also... you loose a good 10rwkw in stock form... more power you put in the more your going to loose :P

but yeah, get some management and then re-asses whats going on as currently you cant really get a good idea.

If something is wrong you could spend ages looking and not find it as there are too many things with a bigger turbo and stock ECU.

Get tuning in there and post up the results.

I'd be interested to see what comes of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lol a few are like that with no intention of being reborn unfortunately. 
    • Done, I'll do mine soon too - whenver I take out the car next. I can cheat and make it quieter by turning off VCT at idle too - but I lose the braps
    • All trim back in wired running driving. Few things to follow up on but not far off the return to the road. att.6HN4wP38LTIOISkhA8eACoBFqzfgQMahZPLA8ut0pqE.mp4 att.w2q0ux2PGuqgQTj2Os13cNHQtqcSEcCAhD_CAXy_IQM.mp4
    • The trouble with phone apps is that they really do not know the sensitivity of the mic on each specific phone, whether there is some sort of cover or skin that can change that, etc etc. So the readings off them are not calibrated. You certainly couldn't be sure that you were even within 3 dB. I have the same app on two (actually more than that) different phones/tablets and the readings in the same room at the same time are never the same. I don't mind the apps - they are as useful as a dyno - if you're testing for delta from thing1 to thing2. But not to try to generate some sort of absolute value.
    • I'm gonna use the "Sound Meter" app from the Google Play Store and as close as I can bother to these procedures: 4. TEST METHOD FOR ALL VEHICLES EXCEPT PRE ADR83 IN-SERVICE GOODS VEHICLES AND OMNIBUSES 4.1 Microphone position 4.1.1 The microphone shall be directed towards the orifice of the exhaust outlet and shall be supported by a tripod or similar device not providing excessive acoustic reflection. The general requirements for positioning microphones are shown in the Appendix. 4.1.2 The nominal axis of maximum sensitivity of the microphone shall be substantially parallel to the test site surface and shall make an angle of 45 degrees ±10 degrees with the principal direction of gas flow from the exhaust. 4.1.3 In selecting the 45 degree alignment from the outlet of a motor vehicle fitted with two or more outlets, only the angle resulting in the microphone being farthest from any other outlet must be used. National Stationary Exhaust Noise Test Procedures for In-Service Motor Vehicles Page 3 4.1.4 The height of the microphone above the test site surface shall be equal to that of the orifice of the exhaust outlet ±25mm but shall not be less than 200mm above the test site surface. 4.1.5 The distance of the microphone from the exhaust outlet orifice shall be 500mm±25mm. 4.1.6 [Relates to vertical exhaust outlets] 4.1.7 For vehicles fitted with one exhaust outlet the microphone shall be placed so that the greatest possible distance is achieved between it and the vehicle. 4.1.8 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] 4.1.9 [Relates to multi exhaust outlets] TLDR: 200mm off ground 45 degree angle relative to exhaust flow 500mm from tailpipe exit. (I probably won't use a tripod) Here's a photo, cause I read the instructions wrong myself.
×
×
  • Create New...