Jump to content
SAU Community

RB vs. SR


Recommended Posts

I own a ca18de S13 Silvia. My mate is about to buy a sr20det powered 180sx. I'm considering putting a rb20det in my car. Will I be able to beat him? How would the race go? With mild mods on both engines, how would we fair?

Also, how does the RB20DET fair against a 13B series 4 rx7 at stock boost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The person with the most money would win. ;):);)

But if you want an advantage, go the RB. It has 2 more cylinders :-) so the power output is less stressful per component.

And it revs like a m.f......

Sounds good too. SR sounds like a wet dog sometimes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 b kills both of them and wheighs less.

try putting a 13b in a s13 hehe light drift mobile.

I think the ca18s got the crappy brakes but as fars as i know they r the same as the sr20 powered s13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RB configuration due to it being a six cylinder 2 litre has shorter strokes so off the factory its lacking in torque and yes less than the sr20det.

The RB revs out very nicely though and isnt so weazy.

The RB bottom end is probably stronger being cast iron.

The SR has the potential to go 350-400hp stock but then again so does the RB.

I personally would go with the RB because its just a better starting point.

I do like the timing chain setup on the ser20det because it doesnt cost money to change it on the 100 k service.

But end of the day its how much money you have and both motors are very reliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13b kills em but the seals go if you drive 'em hard. as with all rotary / wankel designs.

and if you get even mild pinging..... cyal8r 13b.

besides that 350hp+ out of a 13b can be considered pretty stressful (i mean its no v8!) but you'll be lighter... and a rebuild won't cost as much.

but when all is said and done: if u want something that goes damned fast and lives 2-3 times longer than a 13b, go the sr or rb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • Not fine enough, only good as a pre filter. You need like a 10 micron. FWIW I run a 40 micron pre filter then before the rail, there's a 10 micron (maybe finer, can't remember).
    • OK, so. Look very closely at this. Here is a snip of the ECU diagram. Note that the VSS (Vehicle Speed Signal) input to the ECU is sent from the speedo head. The speed sensor on the gearbox (whether auto or manual) is connected to the speedo, and the speedo converts that AC voltage signal to a 0-5V DC PWM signal that the ECU reads. Pin 58 is NOT used by the ECU. It is used by the TCU. And unlike Duncan's thought on the matter, I would think that the only comparison done (by the TCU) would between trans output shaft speed and engine rpm. This so that the TCU can know whether the lockup converter is doing its thing, the clutches are managing shifts appropriately, etc etc. I would be willing to bet that the only speed signal you need to intercept with any speed cut defender, regardless of auto or manual transmission, would be the VSS into pin 29. That is the only speed signal available on a manual. And here is the rub. Your car is a manual. So why are we even having this conversation. There is NO speed signal input on pin 58 on your car right now and it runs just fine. That should tell you how important that pin is for your manual ECU.
    • well, here's hoping it is off to a good home, looks like the new owner got a steal
    • That's the last time I'll see the 180sx. It's off to Victoria do keep an eye out for it down there. 
×
×
  • Create New...