Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have just bought a 95 r33 gtr. It has just posted 310 kw @ the wheels. It has 2 steel plated ball bearing turbo's running 20 psi.

Upgrded intercooler and piping.

Adjustable hks cam gears

3.5 inch Exhaust going straight through cat.

twin sports air filters

Electronic boost controller

Aftermarket E.C.U

air flow meter

hks sports cluth and fly wheel

injectors and fuel pump.

Sports suspenion and 19x10 mags.

I would expect on a cold night with octane booster about 325-330 at the wheels.

What 0-100 km times and 1/4 times would this be possible of. I would never take it to the drags but just want to know for my own interest. I was told it was possible for high 10's and just under 4 sec 0-100. Does this sound about right?

I know of a R33 GTR with 285kw at the wheels that has done a 11.8 @ 118MPH. So id guess you would be looking at a 11.2-11.6 pass at about 120-124mph. You would need to post something like a 1.6-1.7sec 60foot time though.

0-100KM/PH would be in the 3.5-4.0sec area, depending on launch.

About the lowest power for a 10sec pass ive seen, was a stripped out R32 GTR with a dog box and HKS-2540'S that ran a high 10sec pass with 358awkw... it needed a 1.51sec 60foot to do it though!!!

If you've just got steel wheeled turbo's, and allready need 20psi to post 310kw at the wheels, then without a rebuild of the engine, or c16/avgas, you wont be able to run much more boost than what you are allready. Sounds like you have N1 turbo's fitted. No GTR with N1's is gonna have enough power to run a 10sec pass IMO.

Edited by mazgtr

[Thanks guys for all your responses. I would be more than happy with 11.2-11.6 1/4 mile time. I don't see myself taking it to the track any time soon though. I just wanted it set up for maximum accelaration and quickest 0-100 times just for every day driving to have the huge power when I want it off the mark to say goodbye at the lights etc. If I can run close to 3.5 0-100 I am happy with the results.

I know it is set up for turbo's to kick is asap which is about 2900 rpm and has already 200+ @wheels by 4000 rpm and just keeps going.

All up I have spent about $8500 for the mods, since it already had cat back exhaust, intercooler upgrade, suspenion and mags when I bought it. It's not a V-SPEC model done under 35,000kms. Is $45,000 on road a decent price for this car with such low km's and such mods. Including full black re-spray and sterio system and new clutch plates on top of the 8500.

Anyway I still haven't even driven it yet or being in a gtr let alone a modified one. I hope its as good as everyone says and the good thing is my misses can drive a manual. What a shame.

Just one more question for you guys with GTR'S dyno is the power at all 4 wheels or does it revert to only rear wheels on dyno?

Edited by gdogzgtr
[Thanks guys for all your responses. I would be more than happy with 11.2-11.6 1/4 mile time. I don't see myself taking it to the track any time soon though. I just wanted it set up for maximum accelaration and quickest 0-100 times just for every day driving to have the huge power when I want it off the mark to say goodbye at the lights etc. If I can run close to 3.5 0-100 I am happy with the results.

I know it is set up for turbo's to kick is asap which is about 2900 rpm and has already 200+ @wheels by 4000 rpm and just keeps going.

All up I have spent about $8500 for the mods, since it already had cat back exhaust, intercooler upgrade, suspenion and mags when I bought it. It's not a V-SPEC model done under 35,000kms. Is $45,000 on road a decent price for this car with such low km's and such mods. Including full black re-spray and sterio system and new clutch plates on top of the 8500.

Anyway I still haven't even driven it yet or being in a gtr let alone a modified one. I hope its as good as everyone says and the good thing is my misses can drive a manual. What a shame.

Just one more question for you guys with GTR'S dyno is the power at all 4 wheels or does it revert to only rear wheels on dyno?

awkw.

So all wheels.

Haha I hope you have experience with modified cars, coz if you haven't this thing is going to be lethal in your hands! :)

Take it easy for a while until you get used to your machine.

[i've only had a TT Soarer and my misses has a TT supra which has 220 @ rear wheels. I will take it easy for a while for sure. One thing I have over most of you guys thiugh is I have done a 2 week extreme drivers course due to my job as a cop. Please don't hate me now I don't pick on Jap imports just when people have BOV that can be heard miles away or drive like a dick head we pull them over. Well that's in victoria I can't speak for other states and I can't speak for Traffic units either. Generally the most we can do is EPA the cars due to open air filters and BOV otherwise you are left pretty much alone.

Thanks again for your response. :)

Also in repsonse to earlier saying 20 kw gain form octane boost. It's not just the booster a dyno is the equilivent as a 35 deg day as lack of cool air as only fan blowing. If your doing 80km/h plus and it's a cold night you would get that improved 5% gain.

Edited by gdogzgtr

You're a cop hey?

The import drivers worst enemy....joke, joke.

It's cool how u don't pull imports over for no reason, which is what a lot fo cops do.

Also find it interesting, that your car is defectable! LoL.

Nah that's cool, I hope you stay on the forums and contribute to the Victoria section about laws/defects n stuff, coz it comes up a lot.....e.g "Are my pedals defectable, Are abc, or xyz allowed etc etc."

Always good to hear inside knowledge.

No worries. Anyone with questions on what's legal or defecable in victoria I will find out. There is no point spending good money to do up cars just to find out that it's illegal and you have to remove it or your car is unroadworthy.

The most obvious things are loud exhausts, open air filters in engine bay and BOV which are all EPA issues.

Edited by gdogzgtr

I reckon you should give it a run at the drags and find out!

If you are too timid to drive it yourself (don't feel bad - that is a serious machine you have on your hands!) I'm sure there are plenty of friendly SAU members that would be willing to donate their time and run your car into the 11's for you :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...