Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Crew,

ive got an RB20 BB turbo on an SR20DET motor its had a few mods-

larger intake housing (4mm) and

larger V-Comp wheel to suit.

Im about to purchace an RB version of the disco potato which has an A/R of .64

I want the turbo to be as responsive as possible and i believe the A/R of the RB20DET is around .50

I guess my question is how much lagier will .64 be in comparison to .50

I can retain the .50 housing if i wish but im not sure it will reach 300HP at the wheels

The car currently makes 216HP on 15PSI

Looking to run more boost that why i want the Steel wheeled Diso Potato

Any assistance much appreciated

yes thats the closest guess we can make .48... and it will not flow anywhere near enough...

I guess you are buying the RB 20 version because you have a t3 style manifold?

because the SR version is cheaper and there is nothing wrong with the standard SR manifold... you will be able to put out 300 with the SR manifold and a disco...

Also they spool great!!! have been in 2 cars with them.

Yeah ive got a manifold which has a T3 foot, Morrie is now doing an RB disco turb which has the .64 housing. going the RB route will just save me all the extra costs of having to convert back to SR stuff IE manifold oil lines, new plumbing etc.

I have been told that the RB20 exhaust housing can just scrape it into the 300's so long as it has a rear steel wheel and plenty boost..

I like reeee sponse.

ive gotta get myself a ride in a .64 SR

honestly you will be forcing so much boost thru your engine you will be risking head gaskets. dont do the rb20 housing you will regret it.

the gt28rs is a perfect turbo for a sr20. trust me you woll be happy with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...