Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

driver.

youve been racing yours @ the strip for a while now remember

Private road and rolling runs, not much any driver can't do except change one gear (2nd to 3rd). No offence, but mine felt punchier too and as expected it should running closer to 20psi against 14psi.

Edited by Robo's
  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i dunno, my car with 270 hauled some serious a$$... there is no doubt about that.

Bass's comes on waaay earlier than mine did and it feels pretty damn fast to me as i was in it the other day.

For a daily driver thats the turbo i would want. Mine wasnt really a daily so it didnt matter.

The GCG hi-flow from being in the car has very linear power delivery.

As reflected by the power curve, where are mine was a little laggier but by christ it hauled once it was on and i got to 3rd hehehe

The GCG being smaller doesnt need that long to get going. Im happy to say that they are of excellent quality

Not getting into a workshop/dyno battle or whatever. Its not called for, certainly not in a good thread like this. I doubt RPM is differnt to most places. The inertia settings there are different to other places etc

Many things affect it all, like how long its been since calibration and what not etc etc. long long list.

i dunno, my car with 270 hauled some serious a$$... there is no doubt about that.

Bass's comes on waaay earlier than mine did and it feels pretty damn fast to me as i was in it the other day.

For a daily driver thats the turbo i would want. Mine wasnt really a daily so it didnt matter.

The GCG hi-flow from being in the car has very linear power delivery.

As reflected by the power curve, where are mine was a little laggier but by christ it hauled once it was on and i got to 3rd hehehe

The GCG being smaller doesnt need that long to get going. Im happy to say that they are of excellent quality

Not getting into a workshop/dyno battle or whatever. Its not called for, certainly not in a good thread like this. I doubt RPM is differnt to most places. The inertia settings there are different to other places etc

Many things affect it all, like how long its been since calibration and what not etc etc. long long list.

Im sure it is quick, so your saying boosting Bass's car up, is not going to achieve much. Coz 250rwkw at 14psi is certainly high and thats why i had to feel silvas 244rwkw coz i didnt really beleive it at that psi.

I know dynos get regularly serviced but my mate has one and i was spewing when he told me that my old readings where 20 rwkw high as the barometric pressure were reading incorrect. And he showed me how air intakes readings can increase readings as well. So now, i tend to look at the data on the bottom of dyno graphs.

250rwkw at 14psi when its not even in the turbos effeceint range sounds a little too high.

I'd say the turbo at 14psi would be smack in the middle of its efficiency..

Going by the fact that some others with this same turbo *r34/vg30 turbine housing* have made 270rwkw.

The R34/VG30 turbine is a .7 something, as a result less back pressure, less reversion and higher VE.

The GT28 & 30 are in the meat of their efficiency at around 1bar according to the compressor maps in the garrett catalogue. Its not directly comparable as the GCG unit does run a smaller comp cover.

Any one know what comp wheel the GCG highflow uses? GT28 or GT30?

It would be interestering to see the boost a Non-Neo RB25DET with stock cams would need to make the same power as Bass.

Edited by Cubes
Im sure it is quick, so your saying boosting Bass's car up, is not going to achieve much.  Coz 250rwkw at 14psi is certainly high and thats why i had to feel silvas 244rwkw coz i didnt really beleive it at that psi.

well he simply cant due to the pinging issues he has/comp related to the NEO.

As cubes said, if its right on the song then thats where it is.

Anyone got a comp map of the GCG to have a bit of a look-see?

Does one exist?

If not then its like all other hi-flows, basically a gamble that no-one knows what or how its going to perform on any given spec'd motor

If maybe he dropped it via a nice big gasket it would be interesting to see what it can do, if anything. Only one way to find out really isnt there?

Over to your H/G hunting Poiter :P even though i know you aint getting one lol.

There isn't a map available I'm told by GCG. Also I'm pretty sure it's the GT30 core but I can't remember how I know that.

As we all know there are heaps of variables in engines. Dropping the compression in Bass' car might only net him the same power at more boost.

For every 0.5 drop in compression ratio you need roughly 0.2 bar increase in boost to achieve the same power.

This is why I was never going to go down to 8.2 as someone recommended because I would have needed to push about 1.25 bar just to keep the same power I had at 0.85 bar previously.

I was told by ATS (who forward customer on to the GCG hiflow option, so theyve got nothing to gain by making up dodgy info) that the cores are GT30 and ground down to suit the specific application....... as best as my memory serves me.

Hope that helps.

Brendan

Mine gathers dust.

Mine gathers dust faster than yours.... but my dust-dyno has different settings so i dunno now! :P

I clicked on this thread expecting to read about your rebuild... 1 post for the rebuild, 4 pages for off-topic convo haha, still a good read :)

It is about my rebuild but it was also supposed to be a repository for NEO info which it has turned out to be.

Shonen - you're obsessed with highmount. I'm more likely to put nos on it than a highmount. That said, a 2835ProS would be nice but I can't afford anything atm.

I've already got the highflow so I'm sticking with that due to $$. I've got some cams going in though so that should make some difference.

I think the 4 doors have the viscous LSD and the 2 doors get the helical LSD which means I'll be up for a new diff at some stage.

I think the 4 doors have the viscous LSD and the 2 doors get the helical LSD which means I'll be up for a new diff at some stage.

Grab a r32 gtr mech clutch center and half shafts (5bolt). You can also fiddle with the ratios if you wish. 3.7, 3.9, 4.083, 4.11, 4.363 are available.

I've seen the gtr centers go from 450-650.

Im going a 3.9:1 out of the auto s13/s14/s15's, should work a little nicer with the 3ltr.

Or there's 1k for a decent 1/1.5/2 way that clunks a little around corners. :P

Edited by Cubes
mph does if the timing is up the creek  :P

i ran 12.1 @ 113 or something still sliding @ 1/2 track. go figure  heheh

Well thats showing you actually got some pretty good traction and not much top end, similiar to a GTR time

thing is i didnt lol. EVeryone found it quite amusing how little i had :unsure:

My car was all top end, had nothing remotely interesting until 4300rpm :)

It was slideways off the line, then skating for approx 1/2 track where it settled, 2.1 60ft...

Timing was so out that day, damn heathcote

Abobob, just wait till you kill the diff.

You never know. It could hold out for a while. If your nice to it there is no reason why it shouldnt really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...