Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

just showing the dyno results of when i got my power fc installed and tuned at fist last month.

set on 10 psi roughly

power fc Ap Engineering

FMIC

CES RAcing split dump

Hiflow 3 inch cat

3" exhaust

Tell us if anything doesn't look right

It does seem to be pretty smooth to drive

I have also noticed that, sometimes when i get in the car to start it has the clickin sound but doesnt start

wait for a bit then starts

im thinking it could be my battery, or coils or something don't know

seems alright at the moment, and voltage has been on 14.1 when driving.

THanks

post-14294-1133250385.jpg

post-14294-1133250796.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96641-dyno-result-from-fist/
Share on other sites

needs to be done on the dyno unfortunately, they connect a sensor to the exhaust to take the readings. I am not 100% sure but i would imagine they would lean it out by removing fuel from the map cells. U could do this yourself with the hand controller but not recommended as u will have no idea when it becomes too lean.

Where did u get it tuned?

powerfc, batmbl dump pipe and hiflo cat, r33 gtr cooler, straight though 3" exhaust (made 30rwkw with this exhaust over the blitz i had before), powerfc boost controller, pod, custom plenum

exhaust has taken a bit of getting use to, especially with the blitz jobby before being not much louder than stock

truth be told, i love how she sounds now

slightly droney, but have decent sound system in car that doesnt make it an issue

did a run down to stanthorpe with full load and passengers never complained once, so cant be too bad

yer, i was happy with mercury

initial tune was 162rwkw with the old exhaust which i was pretty disappointed with

but more than happy now

plan is to high flow the stocko turbo when it falls appart or when i save the cash

wifey has to drive the car and its our daily driver, so cant go too crazy

i got it tuned at FIST

but was thinking of checking out matty spry at the gold coast as heard  good news from him .

And i dont have a hand controller with my power fc, might have to get one .

What mods have you got spooks ?

Good idea to go see another tuner :O From memory matty actually has some real qualifications. I dont thing anyone else really does.

Also try 101 motorcafe.

sounds good spooks, i'm hiflowing the stocker aswell in the future

i'll see how the car goes for the time being

but next tune will be definately be with another mob .

see how they go

might do fuel pump next, get it out of the way.

Thanks for the help

Let yas know how the next tuner goes.

hi fella,

i get my 33 tuned by chiptorque on the gold coast (where matt spry used to work)

they are awesome. lachy the owner really knows the power fc unit well and i heard he got fc edit and datalogit which should save you some cash come dyno time. my 33 has a fmic, power fc and 3/4 exhaust and pulled 185.3rkw with solid afr of 12.1.

cant wait to get back on the dyno for a retune now with cam gears, full pump, reg and ces dump pipe fitted. hopefully should see 200rkw on stock turbo.

just giving you another option come tune time.

cheers glenn

Baz, comparing it side by side with spooks graph it is a good result.

You got 187 and he got 192rwkw. A 5kw margin.

Both have similar mods except you have 2 psi less boost, AFR is 1.2 lower and you have a street exhaust (cat).

Oh, and the inlet temps on his are 44 as opposed to 22. Not sure what the equation is but pretty sure if yours read 44 you might have even seen higher than him.

At the end of the day, dyno charts are holding less and less credibility as time goes past so take it with a grain of salt.

Nice result.

By those readings on my dyno chart

would it class as being a safe reading ???

cause with afr's and inlet temps, wouldnt have a clue of what a optimum level it should be at, to be the most effecient and power.

Would it be worth while gettin my car tuned again as soon as i can

cause too me my car seems to be running quite smooth

But have noticed ( not frequently) the engine warning light flicker while under load)

not sure if its just the power fc learning ( if it does or not)

or timing is just so far advanced

THanks for your comment FATGTS-R

Barret

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...