Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

newkleer - download some of the chip reprogramming tools if you haven't already, and have a bit of a look through.

There is a universal "K" constant as part of the ECU, which can be used to apply more or less fueling across the board and is used to adjust for say larger injectors. One of the programs (I forget which) can automatically do it all for you, just depending on the injectors CC's you enter.

Also refer here...

http://www.boostcruising.com/silvia/eprom.asp

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanks for that. looks like what you would normally change the K value by is what you can apply via consult. but this bit im not sure if you could do anything about:

Also, I used the correction of 0.849 to all the values in the 'boost' section along the bottom of the fuel maps. You will find that once you adjust all those values, and then click Setup - Engine Specification setup, and adjust the Injector Blas-off quantity to the injector size that you are now using, all the values will come back to normal compared to the original map with uncorrected values and standard injector size spec).

that "blas-off" is what i was referring to as "opening time" - i guess it depends on how different they are as to whether its significant (and what the value is used for). perhaps 370->440 wouldnt be too bad, but issues with higher (eg 550)?

The k is the main multiply as most of you may already know.

It just richens or leans out the whole a/f's across the board of the fuel maps etc. For every number increase or decrease it will richen or lean out the overall fueling by 0.1 of a fuel ratio.

So up the k by 10 ( in dec) will up it by 1 afr.

The blast off time or void as its allso know as is the extra pulse width to the injectors that is added too the start and the finnish of the base pulswidth of the injector.

It barely effects the ratios up in the revs under load but it affect the mixture at idle quite dramticly.

For every number up or down it richens or leans out the A/f at idle by 0.1 of a ratio.

Just clearing a few things up with the stock ecu.

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

My PDA still has ALL of my normal PDA functions...it is not just EcuXtend. When I leave the car I throw it in my bag. Same as i did before I had this ecuXtend software on it!!

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

Hi Sydney Kid,

If you dont have the PDA plugged into the car, you car will simply run off the ecu's original settings.

With the PDA plugged in, you car car will use the setting you had when you turned it off.

Caz.. )

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Not much I'd say. All it will do is run a little rich at idle.

From past experience all I did was Once I set up the K to run the correct afr under load etc I just adjusted the void to run the afr of 14.7:1 as it should be according to the fuel map correction values.

Just think of the void as an idle mixture setting.

have made a bit more progress on software, see attachment

need to add a digital reading to the bottom of the gauges, after i do that will try to make it able to go into "full screen", then move on to active tests. gauges were made so that the same gauge can be used in pocketpc app (hence why it looks a bit basic)

post-4553-1134907472.jpg

colours that make up the gauges would be easy to change (something id add later on), but the structure of the gauge itself would be harder to change. a background image would also be hard given the gauge sizes change depending on how many gauges you have (to maximise the amount of screen used for the gauges)

added digital value to gauges and made it full-screen-able (though not sure many people have car computers, but thought itd be good anyway to use up all screen real-estate)

have a list of todo things on my website, whats there should take long enough to do, but if theres any notable omissions of features i should look at let me know

post-4553-1135601413.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

128%! weeee!

Lookin' good, Pete!

You know what i'd really LOVE?

1) To choose which and how many guages show up. (and for them to re-align depending on window/screen size)

2) To have the program start up and connect to the ECU automatically, and start monitoring, and in full-screen.

3) To show boost from the MAP sensor or something... it doesn't come through the consult port, does it?

Anyhoo... if those things existed, then I could finally justify building my car pc with a 7" widescreen touchscreen! =-D

1) does that :D

it automatically works out the best config (eg rows x cols) for the amount of gauges you have to maximise the amount of screen area the gauges take up. if u have 1 gauge itll be full screen for that single gauge, 4 and theyll take up roughly 1/4 screen each. on a widescreen with 6 then id have 2 rows of 3 gauges to fill it out nicely. so will take care of widescreens no probs!

2) good idea, ill add that to the list - would be good for anyone thats smart enough to get a car pc going :D

3) cant do that unfortunately, youll have to stick to traditional gauge for boost

Edited by NewKleer

Hmm... some excellent work, Pete! On a 7" wide, 3 across looks to be the goods!

I can live without the boost reading I guess. =-/

When is a beta available of your software?

Additionally... has anyone ever tried to emulate the R34's digital screen? I think it would be appealing. =-]

(especially if someone could mount the 7" widescreen in one of those triple-guage clusters that are moulded to look like the stock R34 cluster)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

Edited by NewKleer

Thanks NewKleer, :)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

I've been considering developing an ECU/PC interface and consult software for quite some time now. Reading this post has encouraged me to begin writing an application for the linux platform, mainly out of curiousity.

Which may or may not interest anyone on this forum, however if successful; linux would potentially allow me to offer a freely available in-dash ECU management + multimedia + navigation package, that will be able to take advantage of existing technology (i.e. mini-PC, touchscreen LCD, consult<->RS232 cable, GPS receiver)

For now though, it's still a pipe dream!

PS. Any idea where to read the G-sensor from the ECU? That'd be neat!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...