Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

quite possibly that would just be from an external accelerometer than something in the ecu? what other things are on the dash? if theyre largely mechanical type things (rather than typical sensor readings from consult) then id say thats what it is

does it say anything in the service/user manual (if there is one?)

Edited by NewKleer

The R34's show the G-sensors digitally on the dash for 2000 models up, and mechanically for 98-2000 models.

The R32 GTRs and GTS4's have a couple of G-sensors around the place, but you don't get to see what they're doing. I think they would go to the ECU though.

I'm pretty sure the g-sensor would need to report to the ECU for ATTESSA functionality, unless of course there's a sperate unit/controller for it...

Also, just to confirm... HICAS is also controlled from the ECU? Or does it just manage the steering angle sensor and the like somewhere else?

Re: G-sensor ECU input for R32 GTR. The last few pages are the relevant section. It's the Autospeed article on the R32 from years back.

Thanks for the article, which for those that havn't read it, explains how to intercept the signal between the accelerometer (g-sensor) and the ECU. Which also allows for modification (i.e. piggyback system).

However, what I'd like to do, is read the sensor output voltage from the ECU (via the consult port)

Suppose we could try some reverse engineering.

trying to read g-sensor via consult port would mean reprogramming the ecu (and knowing how to do something like that). would take 5% of the time of that to just read the voltage directly from the sensor.

The documentation I have read implies that there *is* a consult port (that is, it had an id byte after a two byte initialisation)

it just doesn't seem to be wired up.

Of course, I could be wrong.

though it appears that all the computers get *all* their data as sensor voltages.... ahh, the possiblilties are endless

(when I make that attessa controller, I'll share it with confidence - as opposed to state my theory and get shot to pieces)

While I'm at it, I'll ask this question:

What are the inputs to the hicas computer, AND how does it control the pump (r32).

heck - the same with attessa. I have partial information on the input, none on how it controls the centre diff.

I suspect I'll need to get at it with a multimeter one day...

supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

Consult and Conzult work with AirCon, Hicas and Auto Trans in the Z32's. They each have their own seperate control unit but all read from the DDL.

quote=NewKleer,31 Jan 2006, 06:26 PM]

supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

  • 2 weeks later...

have released an alpha version of ecu talk while or work on the consult lcd

http://www.ecutalk.com

needs .net framework 1.1, links on the downloads page there

Edited by NewKleer
supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

on my r32 gtr the hicas ecu wont respond to the initialisation unless there are delays between bytes but the engine ecu responds with no delays could be to do with the extra distance to the hicas ecu in the boot or even the different processor used by hicas, my ac ecu also remains silent with no delays but i have only just discovered

the need for delays and have not tested for the aircon delays yet.

i read that plms have to send initialisation more than once sometimes they are possibly not using delays.

my hicas responds to hex ff ff e4 with 10 then i send d1 f0 hicas then streams the error codes FF020000 ff start byte, 02 number of data bytes following, 0000 error code bytes ie no errors when ignition was last turned off

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...