Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

My GTS-T (5 Speed) made 160rwkw on the dot with a front mount intercooler, pod filter and turbo back exhaust running 10psi, anymore boost that that and the factory ECU seemed to retard the timing

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im pretty sure my timing was off.

i posted a dyno graph showing the before and after curve.

so just to clarify, i got 147 on 3" turbo back, fmic, pod and 12psi

with retarded timing (i THINK it was sitting a few degrees under stock).

if my timing was spot on then im guessing i would've made around 160kw as my base. but you cant really tell.

also another thing i'd like to add is he said that sometimes the knock sensor on the safc screws with the timing, if the knock is high then somehow it will retard timing so he advised me to disconnect it.

You mean to say you disconnected the knock sensors ?

My GTS-T (5 Speed) made 160rwkw on the dot with a front mount intercooler, pod filter and turbo back exhaust running 10psi, anymore boost that that and the factory ECU seemed to retard the timing

:P my gts-t r33 s1.5, has got 3" front the dump pipe, boost controler set at 11psi (i set it to 10psi once and it did run alot nicer) pod, and thats about it, and its getting 194.9rwkw :(.. stock intercooler, stock ecu as far as i know.. wots with that? how come so high.

dont get me rong, i dont mind, just wondering if there could be other mods that arnt so ovious that may be helping it get so high.

p.s: on stock boost (7psi) it was at 170rwkw :confused:

:P my gts-t r33 s1.5, has got 3" front the dump pipe, boost controler set at 11psi (i set it to 10psi once and it did run alot nicer) pod, and thats about it, and its getting 194.9rwkw  :(.. stock intercooler, stock ecu as far as i know..  wots with that? how come so high.

dont get me rong, i dont mind, just wondering if there could be other mods that arnt so ovious that may be helping it get so high.

p.s: on stock boost (7psi) it was at 170rwkw :confused:

As I understand it, the power figure I managed (which was taken on C & V's dyno) - was pretty much spot on for an RB25DET with the modifications I had at the time.

Varying dynos give varying results - I dont believe you almost reached 200rwkw from an exhaust system and 11psi, sorry.

Its weid people are posting results at ither 160-165rwkws

or 185-195rwks with the same mods

i must addmit us autos 4 in this thread all push 185rwkws and all in second

i was told my turbo was hiflowed cause i pushed alot of hp but i realy dout it now cause we all push the same

confused james

As I understand it, the power figure I managed (which was taken on C & V's dyno) - was pretty much spot on for an RB25DET with the modifications I had at the time.

Varying dynos give varying results - I dont believe you almost reached 200rwkw from an exhaust system and 11psi, sorry.

yeh i was i was a bit like, woh ok.. im just wonding if there has been other mods in the engine that i cant see (im not a car wiz so i only know from what ive picked up here)..

got it done at UAS in castlehill.. they do alot with skylines and 300's, so id wana think the dyno was pritty close for thouse type of cars

red line on low (7psi), blue on high (11psi)

post-22516-1133495754.jpg

Blitz is 100% correct. Not possible to get 50rwkw with a air fuel controller. If that figure was with a power FC i would believe it not with SAFC.

By the way i like your intercooler setup, looks great!

like I said, his base timing must have been way off.

Look at the original graph. Power curve looks like something a 3 year old would draw. I've only ever seen graphs like that with severely retarded base timing.

Does it matter what gear the dyno tune was done in... I'm asking as the tune for my car was done in 3rd (tiptronic), just wondering if doing it in 2nd would've made a difference.

I've been reading with interest too. I'm getting dyno tuned tomorrow with a Jaycar DFA (works the same as SAFC)

I'll definately ask the tuner to check my ignition timing. Excuse my ignorance but is this a quick easy to do (adjust timing) because I only booked in for an hour.

I got similar mods - 3" exhaust, pod, 10psi, stock intercooler - chugs fuel

I've been reading with interest too. I'm getting dyno tuned tomorrow with a Jaycar DFA (works the same as SAFC)

I'll definately ask the tuner to check my ignition timing. Excuse my ignorance but is this a quick easy to do (adjust timing) because I only booked in for an hour.

I got similar mods - 3" exhaust, pod, 10psi, stock intercooler - chugs fuel

5 Minute job

how can you guys argue with whats written on paper?

and i keep saying he didnt only tune my safc!

Your totally right.

Heres a dyno result from an R33 GTR in essentially stock form - I know it might seem a little high, but how could you argue with it? After all, the owner has it on paper

33dyno.jpg

so what you're saying is ive completely fabricated the dyno?

thats f**king stupid.

you're making accusations you cant back up.

Edited by SECUR1TY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah the rule of thumb with an LS is 7psi per 1000rpm. That is decidedly not enough at 6800rpm. I mainly looked for the scenarios where knock started to be picked up and it was later in the session when things were hotter, and oil was thinner, and the pressure was lower than it should be. (i.e very horrible). I am hoping with thicker oil (I was running Penrite ten tenths 10-40, the manual specifies 10-30) that does not leak that it's much improved at that time!!! I am using Project Mu Club Racer CR pads. I'm also using the Project Mu 335C fluid. The symptoms imply that it was fluid that boiled, but no bubbles seemed pretty weird to me when I bled it today. I want to try Castrol SRF as it has a much higher wet temp but, well, I have new Project Mu fluid lol... so I should at least use that. The pedal on track was really noticable. It went from basically normal feeling to instantly near-floor. The car did pull up as before, it was just very much nearly at the floor before the brakes engaged. At that point I pretty much decided the day was very done, it did *kinda* come back during that very slow cooldown lap into the pits. Felt perfectly fine driving home.
    • f**king around with the bro
    • Ludenham   44.2 tops day no issues  
    • Then today, I went to visit a man with an r33 hat Peter and Road and Race sorted the alignment. As it is being set up for general track/hillclimbs etc it has a heap of caster (7o), less camber than I am used to (1o front and 2o rear, as the caster looks after that in turns without the braking downsides), 3mm front toe out and 0 toe rear. Will see how that goes and track tyre wear to see if it does need more camber, but adjsustment is also limited with nismo arms and adjustable bushes at only 1 end. It does have a bent inner tie rod on the driver's side front but as it came up within spec I'll just leave that as is. So, that is getting close to my chapter of this story....could of tidy ups then a shakedown in early October before it finds a new home.
    • So, it went to Unigroup for a run in and tune on Friday, everything went (generally) well. In terms of fixes, the engine was good and there were no leaks. It needed plugs (I hadn't checked them because the coil pack cover was on a new engine and I couldn't imagine they weren't new.....but turns out the temporary plugs to just keep it sealed up were in there.....new plugs gapped to 0.8 and it was fine from there. Also, there was a little preload on the clutch slave which caused some slip. I haven't had the box off so I don't know what the clutch looks like; my guess it is brand new and the pedal had not been adjusted....backed that off a bit and it held fine. Last thing will have Dose crying....the idle especially when cold is a bit difficult between the cams, forward plenum, atmo blow off valve and an 80s air management system. It is fine when hot but a little uneven when cold, will see if I can sort or at least improve that one cold morning. Other than that, tuning went fine. It made 245 but was pulled back to 227 which 2 opportunities to improve in future. 1. The factory CAS is not great and was jumping around at high RPM, so Mark took 2 degrees out up top (that is why it stops making power and lost 20kw). Very safe this way and the extra power is available but will require a more modern ECU and better cam (or even better crank) sensor 2. The 2871 in factory housings is very big for a low mount, and the internal wastegate is too small, so it was creeping from mid range all the way to redline....the duty cycle on the boost controller is turned down a little for safety. That is much harder to fix, it would need a large external gate and that would require a whole bunch of other changes, so it will go as it is for now. It feels nice and healthy and safe, so should be good for about a billion laps like this.
×
×
  • Create New...