Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you're serious about sport photography, then do consider the 20D, because its burst mode is 5fps, where as the 350D is only 3fps.

I planning to take martial arts photos, and within that split second, there's a huge diference between 5fps vs 3fps !!

yeah thats cool.

I just checked the quote i got there and it was for the 20D not the 350D.

The guy at the shop got me talking to one of the sports photograhers down here and he uses the 20D and or the 5D for his work.

SO might look at going down the road when i save a little more $$$'s :D

Cheers B

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If you're serious about sport photography, then do consider the 20D, because its burst mode is 5fps, where as the 350D is only 3fps.

I planning to take martial arts photos, and within that split second, there's a huge diference between 5fps vs 3fps !!

lol, you dont need burst mode for sports photography if you're any good

If you're serious about sport photography, then do consider the 20D, because its burst mode is 5fps, where as the 350D is only 3fps.

I planning to take martial arts photos, and within that split second, there's a huge diference between 5fps vs 3fps !!

Yeah thats also what i was recommended from the guy at the camera shop as he said it would be easy while starting out.

Or he just wanted to sell me a more expensive camera :lol:

lol, you dont need burst mode for sports photography if you're any good

Well seeing as im not any good im sure i will need it to start :)

Hehehe I must be getting old .. cause I cant seem to take a photo of a hit to the head during a sparring competition.

Seriously, it's like taking photo of a boxing match. Trying to capture a hit to the head is almost imposibe, because even at 5fps is too slow. Might even need 8fps .. of course this doesn't apply to many sport .. because the contact time is so short...

lol, you dont need burst mode for sports photography if you're any good

train yourself not to use it

I will try Obi one

Hehehe I must be getting old .. cause I cant seem to take a photo of a hit to the head during a sparring competition.

Seriously, it's like taking photo of a boxing match. Trying to capture a hit to the head is almost imposibe, because even at 5fps is too slow. Might even need 8fps .. of course this doesn't apply to many sport .. because the contact time is so short...

I can see your point with boxing and martial arts and i think its similar with motorsport, but i would love to be able not to rely on burts mode to get the shot!!!!

Hehehe I must be getting old .. cause I cant seem to take a photo of a hit to the head during a sparring competition.

Seriously, it's like taking photo of a boxing match. Trying to capture a hit to the head is almost imposibe, because even at 5fps is too slow. Might even need 8fps .. of course this doesn't apply to many sport .. because the contact time is so short...

timing.

its better to take a few good shots when the moment is right, rather than 10000 shots where 90% of them are crap

timing.

its better to take a few good shots when the moment is right, rather than 10000 shots where 90% of them are crap

having said that, do you think im better off waiting till i have enough to buy a 350D or 20D with the Sigma 70-300 lens or get a cheaper film SLR for about $400-600 and start with that???

Taking into consideration im starting out with photography and know about as much as i do about ballet, FARK ALL :lol:

Cheers GMB

having said that, do you think im better off waiting till i have enough to buy a 350D or 20D with the Sigma 70-300 lens or get a cheaper film SLR for about $400-600 and start with that???

Taking into consideration im starting out with photography and know about as much as i do about ballet, FARK ALL :lol:

Cheers GMB

the 350d has 95% of the features the 20d has, i dont really a see a point in you going for the 20d other than for the sake of it

the 350d has 95% of the features the 20d has, i dont really a see a point in you going for the 20d other than for the sake of it

so other than the menu set features/set up and the shutter speed there isn't really a huge difference between the do, just price tag???

Sorry for another dumb noob question

but when im looking at camera's online from places like Ebay what does it mean when it say's thre not a REBEL or REBEL XT???

What price should i look at spending on a new 350D and when im looking at getting a memory card would a couple of 1GB cards be fine and is there a brand that i should look for with advantages over the others? EG: read/write speeds

Cheers B

Canon Digital Rebel = 300D

Canon Digital Rebel XT = 350D

as for memory cards

kingston and sandisk are both good, and they both have their ranges of high speed cards

get a 1gb or 2gb card

Cheers darK

timing.

its better to take a few good shots when the moment is right, rather than 10000 shots where 90% of them are crap

Hey, I would be extremely happy to have a 10% success rate :)

Hehehe .. OK, how about a challenge :) ?? Can I get you to go and take a photo of a pigeon in flight in manual mode .. try to time it at full wing span :) .. See how 'good' your timing is :) .. I'm just darn too slow .. and prefer to depend on a 5-8fps camera, if I want to take photos of fast moving object.

d-d have you had a chance to use it yet and if so what do you think for a beginner???

I'll have it in about 2 weeks. Ill PM you then :)

Canon Digital Rebel XT = 350D

Correct. However, i think the American version of the 350D is called the Rebel XT. Whereas the Australian version is just the '350D'.

So maybe there is a slight difference between the Rebel XT 350D and the Aussie 350D. Was what i found from readings...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...