Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey people. Just a quick question as i've got an rb25det conversion from a sII r33 into my 180sx. :) Just want to know what to do with my intercooler plumbing. As i used to have a ca18det powered 180, i have the intercooler core and bottom arms of the plumbing coming up through the battery hole and the pod filter area on the left and right.

The thing is, im wondering if I should get either a GReddy or Plasmaman Inlet Plenum to shorten the plumbing and make it easier to plumb it all up. As i'm intending to put on a high-mounted GT30R on eventually, i wont be able to have the traditional over the rocker-covers plumbing.

Has anyone run either the bolt up plasmaman plenum head on the stock throttle body and intake runners - or the whole new plenum chamber from GReddy, which i've heard can sap from the mid-range.

Anyway i could also do a cut-and-shut of the stock plenum to have the plumbing in and out, but i haven't heard how this makes the car behave, because im fairly big on drivability.

Any help from the tech-heads is very much appreciated

Cheers

Edited by tuna_144
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/100932-rb25det-plenum-choices/
Share on other sites

this is my current set up, theres no room over the top of the engine for the pipes, the hood would never shut. This gives a long way for air to go, but i made it from narrrow exhaust tubing to keep the volume down. its only running 0.7bar on stock tubby now anyway.

(sorry huge pics)

200SXRB25conversion.jpg

SP_A0186.jpg

I am going to run gt3071r with supporting mods in a couple of months so have recently ordered a custom plenum creations rb25det plenum. Its a very good price and very good plenum, can run nice short pipes then, yay.

Edited by tom200
can anyone say 'mandrel bends'? LOL

-rb25

:lol: haha, i thought the same.

Check out the ISLEEP Custom Plenum Creation plenum, read the Greedy ones arent the best for even cylinder filling and performance in general.

is that fact or just rumor that the greddy plenums are puss?

wouldnt a major company make sure they flow well without damaging engines.. i just find it hard to belive such a big company would make utter crap if what some people are saying is true??

not having a go ether as i know nothing about the how they all flow... but with the millions of dollars greddy have im sure they could of made a better plenum if there suposidly (crap)..

I think more what they mean is that the GReddy inlet plenum's are designed for performance, and thus are really intended for top-end peak power. From the plenum designs i've seen fitted to nissans (mostly sr's), it appears to rob the car of some low to mid-range power and torque in favour of all-out power.

ive heard alot of reports that no matter what power figure rev range etc, the greddy ones for their money still flow no where near as good as other brands....Ariel can provide u with flow tests to show u...

heres a pic of mine with the 80mm throttle body, can get pics soon when its on the car

ben...

post-4085-1136678875.jpg

Hey people. Just a quick question as i've got an rb25det conversion from a sII r33 into my 180sx.  :D  Just want to know what to do with my intercooler plumbing. As i used to have a ca18det powered 180, i have the intercooler core and bottom arms of the plumbing coming up through the battery hole and the pod filter area on the left and right.

The thing is, im wondering if I should get either a GReddy or Plasmaman Inlet Plenum to shorten the plumbing and make it easier to plumb it all up. As i'm intending to put on a high-mounted GT30R on eventually, i wont be able to have the traditional over the rocker-covers plumbing.

Has anyone run either the bolt up plasmaman plenum head on the stock throttle body and intake runners - or the whole new plenum chamber from GReddy, which i've heard can sap from the mid-range.

Anyway i could also do a cut-and-shut of the stock plenum to have the plumbing in and out, but i haven't heard how this makes the car behave, because im fairly big on drivability.

Any help from the tech-heads is very much appreciated

Cheers

Geezus man, do a search, this subject is done to death...........hundreds of times.

If you are keeping to standard internals then the standard inlet is the best, for everything, max power, average power and throttle response. Want to know why........then try the search button. Want to know how it has been tested? On the car? On the flow bench? Then do a search.

This is one of THE best supported forums in the world, whatever subject you can think of there is a 99.9999% chance that someone thought of it long before you did. There are enough race car engineers, machine shop owners, mechanics, fluid dynamics engineers, etc etc that post on here to have the questions answered years ago.

:D cheers :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...