Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Do the motor registry and/or Police take notice of these "engineers certificates" ?

I went through the pain of getting my vehicle over the dickson pits and registerd just before I did the motor in (3 visits). As rego is expensive I asked a lady at the registry that if I cancelled my rego (cash back) and the car was off the road for less than 12 months would I have to go over the pits again. Answer NO.

Truth turns out to be YES. Now I'll have to do a shit load of visits and depending on the mood and the guys on at the time I am sure I'll get a reaming.

Edited by Sinista32
Truth turns out to be YES. Now I'll have to do a shit load of visits and depending on the mood and the guys on at the time I am sure I'll get a reaming.

Oh Sin, I'm sure you'll bend over backwards for him.....

Do the motor registry and/or Police take notice of these "engineers certificates" ?

No they dont. Police can issue a defect notice for a stock standard car if they wish, its your job to take it to Dickson and get it cleared.

And on that note, Dickson can also reject engineer certificates if they still believe the car does not meet ADR's.

And MYSHY, all 15 year imports have to be engineered to get rego. Cars that came in under a compliancing scheme like mine and sinista's dont have to have engineering certificates for registration (thats what the compliance plate is for).

Nik, have you ever heard of Dickson rejecting an engineer's certifcate before?

If you have, do you know for what reason?

Yes I have, was on an imported car with Blitz technospeed wheels. The engineer had issued a certificate saying it was safe etc ok. Still didnt change the fact the wheels were more than 15% larger in rolling diameter than factory, which meant they were not ADR compliant, and hence rejected.

I was talking to a guy from the Northern Territory at the nats. He had a VL commodore with a RB26 in it. I asked about engineering and he told me he didnt need it! He said that up there, its all done on displacement. So technically going from an RB30ET to a RB26DETT is a DOWNGRADE!

I dont know if he left out any info but if thats true im going to retire to the NT!

Edited by noakespg

Amaru. yes you are correct about the 15 year rule if your car is modified in any way but not if your car is standard you dont need an engineer

you can do all the work yourself and get the side intrusion etc put in and checked

Mainly just saying that you can get anything engineered, but the cops can still anything they want to your car :D

Nik, have you ever heard of Dickson rejecting an engineer's certifcate before?

If you have, do you know for what reason?

They rejected my engineer's certificate, actually. They said the certificate mentioned "two seats" when obviously the car had four. It took a phone call from the engineer to say "yes it says two seats on that line, then on the next line down it says 'and another two seats'". :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...