Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when I installed mine on my R32, i noticed a big difference, but it could have been my imagination.

Apparently rear suspension isn't effected greatly by a strut bar, because most of the suspension compnents are bolted on to the subframe rather than the chassis (whilst skyline front suspension is connected to chassis)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y19/merli...ar_rear_R32.jpg

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1904463
Share on other sites

i put front and back on at the same time on my 32 but noticed a difference dont no which one did it but im happy with them, i want to get the cusco add on to the rear strut the connects to the floor aswell!!

if you havent got a front one already goto homerules(ns) 300 for front and back cusco bargain!

post-16065-1138450492.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1905375
Share on other sites

The major benefit in suspension rigidity from a strut brace occurs when it links the upper control arm inner mounting points to each other. The strut brace then effectively doubles the strength and helps to preventing unwanted dynamic changes in camber.

This is a picture of the front suspension (R34GTR in this case, however R32/33 are much the same). As you can see, there is no subframe linking the upper arms, they are bolted to the inner guards (the chassis). So linking the shock tops (on the inner guards) with a strut brace, effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms;

R34_GT_R_Front_Suspension.jpg

Contrast this with the rear where the rear subframe already very effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms. Noting that the arms are not bolted to the chassis at all, they are in fact bolted directly to the subframe;

R34_GT_R_Rear_Suspension.jpg

Consequently adding a high mounted rear strut brace adds very little (if any) rigidity to the upper control arm mounting points.

There is a very small (in fact tiny) argument that could be put that says the rear strut brace adds to the overall rigidity of the chassis. But the pivot joints on the strut bar where it joins to the tops, makes even this small this benefit negligible.

The bottom line, a front strut is a very useful device on R32/3/34, and should be a must have on your list of handling improvements. A rear strut brace is, in my opinion, a far bit lower on the priorities list and for road arguably shouldn’t be on the priorities list at all.

:P Cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1908538
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i saw a dude in a S12 and he just had one of those racheting straps between the struts and he just tightned it up with the rachet.

dunno if it worked, but you could try it before you went out and bought one.

backyard styles.

woah ..... that is ridiculous

he is tightening the 2 struts together ... why?

the point of the strut brace is to minimise the struts movement inwards and outwards

this thing would only stop them flexing "outwards" but when the force of a corner pushes on the strut it would have no effect whatsoever..

do not bother with this IMHO

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1938066
Share on other sites

Nice technical explanation as always SK.

Btw what about a McPherson strut type at the front? Like the ones from an S13-S15 etc. Do they benefit much from a strut brace? (Seeing as the struts are shallowly angled into the body)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1942260
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...