Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when I installed mine on my R32, i noticed a big difference, but it could have been my imagination.

Apparently rear suspension isn't effected greatly by a strut bar, because most of the suspension compnents are bolted on to the subframe rather than the chassis (whilst skyline front suspension is connected to chassis)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y19/merli...ar_rear_R32.jpg

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1904463
Share on other sites

i put front and back on at the same time on my 32 but noticed a difference dont no which one did it but im happy with them, i want to get the cusco add on to the rear strut the connects to the floor aswell!!

if you havent got a front one already goto homerules(ns) 300 for front and back cusco bargain!

post-16065-1138450492.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1905375
Share on other sites

The major benefit in suspension rigidity from a strut brace occurs when it links the upper control arm inner mounting points to each other. The strut brace then effectively doubles the strength and helps to preventing unwanted dynamic changes in camber.

This is a picture of the front suspension (R34GTR in this case, however R32/33 are much the same). As you can see, there is no subframe linking the upper arms, they are bolted to the inner guards (the chassis). So linking the shock tops (on the inner guards) with a strut brace, effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms;

R34_GT_R_Front_Suspension.jpg

Contrast this with the rear where the rear subframe already very effectively links the inner joints on the upper control arms. Noting that the arms are not bolted to the chassis at all, they are in fact bolted directly to the subframe;

R34_GT_R_Rear_Suspension.jpg

Consequently adding a high mounted rear strut brace adds very little (if any) rigidity to the upper control arm mounting points.

There is a very small (in fact tiny) argument that could be put that says the rear strut brace adds to the overall rigidity of the chassis. But the pivot joints on the strut bar where it joins to the tops, makes even this small this benefit negligible.

The bottom line, a front strut is a very useful device on R32/3/34, and should be a must have on your list of handling improvements. A rear strut brace is, in my opinion, a far bit lower on the priorities list and for road arguably shouldn’t be on the priorities list at all.

:P Cheers :(

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1908538
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
i saw a dude in a S12 and he just had one of those racheting straps between the struts and he just tightned it up with the rachet.

dunno if it worked, but you could try it before you went out and bought one.

backyard styles.

woah ..... that is ridiculous

he is tightening the 2 struts together ... why?

the point of the strut brace is to minimise the struts movement inwards and outwards

this thing would only stop them flexing "outwards" but when the force of a corner pushes on the strut it would have no effect whatsoever..

do not bother with this IMHO

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1938066
Share on other sites

Nice technical explanation as always SK.

Btw what about a McPherson strut type at the front? Like the ones from an S13-S15 etc. Do they benefit much from a strut brace? (Seeing as the struts are shallowly angled into the body)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/103550-rear-strut-bars/#findComment-1942260
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
    • More so GReddy oil relocation kits, sandwich plates, etc. all use 10AN fittings. And same, I've only used 10AN and my car sees track work (circuit, doing laps, not 10 sec squirt business).
×
×
  • Create New...