Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am new here. I used to own a 300ZX TT, which I loved and had plenty of go, but required heaps of time, fuel and money continually. I owned the car for a little under a year and it was off the road more than half that time, being repaired or maintained.

I am now interested in an R32 GTR or R33 GTST. Both are within my price range and, my questions are:

- R32 GTR vs. R33 GtsT (keep in mind power is only good if it is reliable!!)

- What specific issues or weak points can I keep a look out for on the two models in question?

- Am I really going to have less problems/expense with a Skyline over the 300?

- I used to get about 300 - 400kms per 65 - 70 litres in the Zed on BP Ultimate, can I expect better fuel economy than this?

- I am really sick of owning a car that requires all my time, energy and money, will a Skyline be less maintenance, and if yes - which out of the R32 GTR and R33 GtsT will be less work just to keep it on the road (not really looking to mod).

If anyone else can think of any other reasons I will be better off I am keen to know. I need convincing or I am going to just buy a freaking Barina and be done with it!

Thanks,

Scott

buy the braina. sounds like any is too much effort for you :P

Thanks for your utterly useless comment.

It is not too much effort, and in fact I have been very much involved in my car since I have owned it, I have been very hands on especially for someone not so mechanically minded. I am not unprepared to do any work, but for crying out loud 6 out of 12 months off the road?!?!?!

Frustration is the best description of zed ownership, and I have been on aus300zx.com constantly, but enough is enough. A car has to maintain some sort of practicality or it is just not worth it.

I would love the power of a GTR or the looks of an R33, but not if it is going to be the same heartache as the zed.

Does anyone have anything useful to say?

I owned 300zx b4, 89' tt, 2 yrs, only just a radiator hose crack. $35 bucks fixed.

and normal maintaining.

Ur just bad luck to find a bad example of 300zx,

for any cars, the same, if the previous owner didnt look after it, the chances are, U gona get lots of headache and waste lots of money.

Same as Skyline,

GTR R32 is the same, more then 15 yrs old.

spend bit of money to source a good clean example,

R33 Gts t is better for ur situation in my opinion,

as its newer model, find 1 with low kms,

drive its and regular maintaining it should be a sweet ride, no headache.

R33 Gts t is lacking in the power department then GTR, but some mods is enough fun, but if ur serious bout speed, GTR is the way.

now i got R33 95' i get around 450-500kms for full tanks,

very fuel efficen comapre to the ZED.

But u cant skip the regular maintaining,

it is a MUST for sport car.

Hope it helps,

cheers,

darrien

Edited by ZXFIRE

Mate the R32 GTR won't be much better in the reliability factor, or the petrol. It will shit on the 300zx and the R33 in anything performance related but if what you want is a hassle free car I'd definately recommend a late model R33 (96+). At $1.30 a litre mine cost me $69 to fill up and I get 400-450km. Moderately modified.

The R33 will be hassle free and in the end unless you're a racer, that's what's important.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...