Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am new here. I used to own a 300ZX TT, which I loved and had plenty of go, but required heaps of time, fuel and money continually. I owned the car for a little under a year and it was off the road more than half that time, being repaired or maintained.

I am now interested in an R32 GTR or R33 GTST. Both are within my price range and, my questions are:

- R32 GTR vs. R33 GtsT (keep in mind power is only good if it is reliable!!)

- What specific issues or weak points can I keep a look out for on the two models in question?

- Am I really going to have less problems/expense with a Skyline over the 300?

- I used to get about 300 - 400kms per 65 - 70 litres in the Zed on BP Ultimate, can I expect better fuel economy than this?

- I am really sick of owning a car that requires all my time, energy and money, will a Skyline be less maintenance, and if yes - which out of the R32 GTR and R33 GtsT will be less work just to keep it on the road (not really looking to mod).

If anyone else can think of any other reasons I will be better off I am keen to know. I need convincing or I am going to just buy a freaking Barina and be done with it!

Thanks,

Scott

buy the braina. sounds like any is too much effort for you :P

Thanks for your utterly useless comment.

It is not too much effort, and in fact I have been very much involved in my car since I have owned it, I have been very hands on especially for someone not so mechanically minded. I am not unprepared to do any work, but for crying out loud 6 out of 12 months off the road?!?!?!

Frustration is the best description of zed ownership, and I have been on aus300zx.com constantly, but enough is enough. A car has to maintain some sort of practicality or it is just not worth it.

I would love the power of a GTR or the looks of an R33, but not if it is going to be the same heartache as the zed.

Does anyone have anything useful to say?

I owned 300zx b4, 89' tt, 2 yrs, only just a radiator hose crack. $35 bucks fixed.

and normal maintaining.

Ur just bad luck to find a bad example of 300zx,

for any cars, the same, if the previous owner didnt look after it, the chances are, U gona get lots of headache and waste lots of money.

Same as Skyline,

GTR R32 is the same, more then 15 yrs old.

spend bit of money to source a good clean example,

R33 Gts t is better for ur situation in my opinion,

as its newer model, find 1 with low kms,

drive its and regular maintaining it should be a sweet ride, no headache.

R33 Gts t is lacking in the power department then GTR, but some mods is enough fun, but if ur serious bout speed, GTR is the way.

now i got R33 95' i get around 450-500kms for full tanks,

very fuel efficen comapre to the ZED.

But u cant skip the regular maintaining,

it is a MUST for sport car.

Hope it helps,

cheers,

darrien

Edited by ZXFIRE

Mate the R32 GTR won't be much better in the reliability factor, or the petrol. It will shit on the 300zx and the R33 in anything performance related but if what you want is a hassle free car I'd definately recommend a late model R33 (96+). At $1.30 a litre mine cost me $69 to fill up and I get 400-450km. Moderately modified.

The R33 will be hassle free and in the end unless you're a racer, that's what's important.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...