Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was hoping for 150rwkw

Stage1 the first dyno was with a cat back 3 1/2" exhaust & K&N pod filter. = 127.6rwkw(3rd gear)

Stage2 the second dyno is with the cat back exhaust,pod filter

also combined dump & front pipe + hi-flow cat(BATMBL)

r33 turbo(rb20 actuator) & r34smic = 126rwkw(4th gear)

Stage3 then added a $22 manul boost controller set to 14psi but drops to 11psi & SAFC tuned by HITMAN = 143.9rwkw(4th gear)

i have a few imperfections on my car such as, 1xbolt missing from dump,number 6 bolt from the exhaust manifold & a suspect intercooler pipe rubber connecter thingy that blew off twice during the 3rd dyno.

1)would these imperfections be holding my car back?

2)anyone know why the car was dyno'd in two different gears?(i was not present at the 2nd dyno)

3)why did i loose 1rwkw between stage 1 and 2?

post-16944-1139998727.jpg

post-16944-1139998971.jpg

Edited by RSTME
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/105984-rb20-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

Ok...

1) This one, using RB25 turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...dpost&p=1894870

2) This one using RB25 turbo

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...dpost&p=1897079

165 odd rwkw or whatever @ a rough conversion.

Using a bit of interpretation here wouldnt go astray.

Obviously you have leaky manifold, so its going to affect power and response.

Every dyno is different, so results varying 20rwkw makes absolutely no difference at all. Its all to do with dyno config.

If you made mods, went back and it made more power, then you cant ask for anymore save going to a dyno day and comparing everyting all on the same dyno, on the same day.

so i guess ill be at the next dyno day, which is the UAS 1 i think.

i just thought id get more then a 16rwkw gain from the above mods.

time to take it to WSID and see what i get.

cheers for the advise R31Nismoid

My R32 with no boost control, stock ic, 3" turbo back exhaust with a regular highflow cat made 10.9psi solid all the way to redline.

Later I fitted a FMIC, made no difference to the boost, still 10.9psi.

Prior to FMIC, 12.5psi had it making 152rwkw with fairly tidy afr's due to the fuel pump being tired. Given your peak power was made with 11psi another 1.5psi is likely to achieve a similiar peak power.

In order to hold over 12.5psi to redline I had it holding boost via 2 methods.

1. Good elec auto (boost curve learning ebc) such as the avcr, Blitz SBC-ID. I ran the Blitz SBC-iD, auto mode I selected to run 15psi, it learnt the boost curve and held it perfectly. Select to run the boost control in manual mode (fixed duty cycle) and it would drop boost.

2. I modified the wastegate bracket. Elongated the mounting holes in order to pull the wastegate towards the front of the turbo, this limits the total opening of the wastegate flap.

This held 15-16psi perfectly so I ripped the blitz sbc-id off sold it and put the money towards the rb25de head for the rb30det setup I had planned on.

Power is pretty much around the mark for a usual non-happy, unfiddled dyno. :)

If the hose is blowing off it's possible that there is a boost leak there aswell. Replacing the hose with a decent one (either reinforced rubber or silicone) is a pretty cheap bit of insurance. But i doubt that's your problem.

As cubes has said, either modding the stock actuator or getting an aftermarket adjustable type will help hold boost to redline and so make some more top end power. Something else worth considering is adding a bit of base timing. 1-2 degrees max. You don't really want to do this unless the car is on the dyno to check for ping though.

ill go take my front bar off now and see what exact shape rubber pipe ill need,how far forward did you move the actuator? 2-3mm?

modifying the actuator sounds heaps cheaper then an electronic boost controller:) cheers

the intercooler pipe looks firmly secure,ill go for a bit of a spirited drive tonight providing the temp. is good outside.

i cant really make the piping anymore efficient without blocking the cooler itself.i guess its time to get a fmic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...