Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I’m surprised no one has brought up the mass the fan adds to the rotational mass of the engine!

From this thread and a few freinds lecky fan attempts I’m understanding that a shrouded, setup, either moded stock one, or custom, f.glass, sheet alloy'd 16" thermo would do.... but i cant STAND that weighted free revving feeling and EH Falcon engine fan noise of a skyline! Lighter flywheel would fix some of it I guess.

Be interesting to check the physical tourqe loadings that a alternator puts on the engine from normal electronics + 10AMP thermo.. and how that compares to the stock locked up engine clutch fan; truley see witch one costs more power, over the cruising, WOT etc that makes up fast street / track running.

In all honesty I would try v.hard to make a thermo work properly due to engine response and noise soley, flame away !!

I believe there’s a array of simple jaycar kits, mechanically switched, or electronic that you could use. Could get fancy and use a PICAXE to control both thermo and electronic water pump, tricky closed loop, solenoid on the thermostat to run a cooler water temp, read: head temp when in high boost mode, and then a higher more emission friendly temp when cruising. Just my way of adding complexity & possibility to a simple thread - sorry :O

- M

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

GeeTR,

When I had the thermo's on it was wonderfully quiet. You don't realise how much noise the std fan makes until its gone. :O

I swear the car did feel a little more responsive ESPECIALLY in hot weather.

I have plans to throw thermo's back on but it will be some form of el factory thermo's.

Yay, acceptance! Amen cubes

Dammit, have 6:30am start, but I have this notion of controlling water temp accurately and quickly to use as another factor you could control, stuck in my head- argh.

I know Bemma and others have been doing it for a while on the specy'r models. Surely just a stepper motor on the stock thermostate or a custom stepper’d valve wouldn’t be hard. Do that multi head coolant bleed setup thingo which is popular of late... you could spend many a weekend tweaking.. if only the time and money *sigh*

- M

I have to admit I reckon thermos are the shiznet even though everyone says that they aren't worth it.

I hate the blowing noise the stocker makers, especially in the morning!

I haven't had a fan shroud for 3 months now and with the new radiator I've never seen it go above 82 degrees (still with fan though) even when driving for an hour with the Air con on. I also used to see the oil temp go up a little with the Air con on, but not now. Yay for biggins radiators.

So, I reckon it's only a matter of time before my stock fan totally accidentally and mysteriously breaks and I have to put a big thermo on.

REV210

As you are MR "Lower your rotational mass" on SAU, have you done this mod?

How did you go with engine cooling?

Did the fan come on and off and sap engine power at all?

Tell me your results!

BASS OUT

I cant believe you think your going to get an increase in power from the lower rotational inertia just by removing the mechanical fan.

The rotational inertia would equate to maybe a couple hundred Watts, not kW.

electric fans are better than mechanical purely from a control perspective. They flow less, but transfer the energy required from the crank to the alternator.

Its not a power gaining mod. More an engine saving one!

Think of it this way, at start stop traffic engine speed is slow. Fan speed is proportional to engine speed (hence so is flow, so long as cavitation isnt present). Electric fans arent related to engine speed, rather engine temp.

Edited by AndrewD

Well I still reckon some bored young aspiring mech / elec uni eng, needs to rig an electrical water pump, thermo and some form of PIC. Have some fun playing around with cooling, assuming both units down mind less the 12v

Davies Craig have just released a variable speed controller which allows the operator to select the heat that he wants to water to be at. From 75 degrees up to 105 degrees.

REV210

As you are MR "Lower your rotational mass" on SAU, have you done this mod?

How did you go with engine cooling?

Did the fan come on and off and sap engine power at all?

Tell me your results!

BASS OUT

No actually I am MADAM " Lower your rotational mass" as I am into drag. :(

Yep did the mod a few times to different cars.

The engine goes well with cooling as I retain the fan shroud and use an appropriate size/ cfm fan.

The fan is normally 'on' in the low speed and stand still situations and off as the car is moving at speed.

The 'at speed' part is what the performance angle is aimed at, particularly as the belt pulley drive horsepower losses grow as engine speed and load does. It's when the hammer is down that you like to have the benifit of a redundant fan being driven.

Never really 'measured' the results as I thought them obvious but, I'm sure the might be a test somewhere if googled for.

Most factory skylines fan shrouds will accept the very large 16 inch davies craig fan with a little cutting to size.

Air guides for both the intercooler and radiator are worth chucking in too if you have the inclination for extra efficiency. Some foam can be used if your not a welding type.

AndrewD,

Rotational intertia doesn't equal horsepower to clear that up.

The weight of the factory fan gone helps improve the engine accelleration a small amount, combined with other pulleys made of lighter material it all adds up to help more.

The weight of the fan on the end of the water pump pulley increases the load on the belt, which increases the fictional power losses.

The benifits you mention seem quite valid by the way.

The reliable nature of the pulley fan has it over the electric fans however. If any part of the electric circuit goes down you have no fan, for the pulley fan to fail the water pump pulley has to fall off. For this reason an electric fan has to be done right with the fail safe fuses and relays and spares of these in the car at all times perhaps with a warning light for good measure.

The altenator doesn't kick in tho to keep up with the current draw tho does it? I though that it just span at the same speed always spitting out the same power...

But what is an extra $90 for a ground stabalizer to help the electic system keep up...

no it doesn't but when you load up the alternator, the engine comp often loads up the engine a bit as the alternator needs to spin a little faster to compensate.

You can feel it sometimes and if you turn on the high beams you can often watch the revs rise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
    • The filter only filters down to a specific size. Add to that, the filter is AFTER the pump. So it means everything starts breaking your pump even if its being filtered out.
    • Just like in being 14mm too small (296mm) makes it not fit, being 14mm too big (324mm) it also won't fit. You want to find the correct rotor.
    • @GTSBoy Ok so that was the shops problem...they showed R33 rotors on R34 page and i did not know 296 do not fit(and are for R33) Yes i bought "kit" with rotors and pads. Pads are ok(i have GTT calipers front and rear). They have some 324mm but no 310mm. So i dont know if they would fit. I have 17inch LMGT4s So another question. Can i fit those in the rear or they are just "too" big for that?
×
×
  • Create New...