Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I’m surprised no one has brought up the mass the fan adds to the rotational mass of the engine!

From this thread and a few freinds lecky fan attempts I’m understanding that a shrouded, setup, either moded stock one, or custom, f.glass, sheet alloy'd 16" thermo would do.... but i cant STAND that weighted free revving feeling and EH Falcon engine fan noise of a skyline! Lighter flywheel would fix some of it I guess.

Be interesting to check the physical tourqe loadings that a alternator puts on the engine from normal electronics + 10AMP thermo.. and how that compares to the stock locked up engine clutch fan; truley see witch one costs more power, over the cruising, WOT etc that makes up fast street / track running.

In all honesty I would try v.hard to make a thermo work properly due to engine response and noise soley, flame away !!

I believe there’s a array of simple jaycar kits, mechanically switched, or electronic that you could use. Could get fancy and use a PICAXE to control both thermo and electronic water pump, tricky closed loop, solenoid on the thermostat to run a cooler water temp, read: head temp when in high boost mode, and then a higher more emission friendly temp when cruising. Just my way of adding complexity & possibility to a simple thread - sorry :O

- M

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

GeeTR,

When I had the thermo's on it was wonderfully quiet. You don't realise how much noise the std fan makes until its gone. :O

I swear the car did feel a little more responsive ESPECIALLY in hot weather.

I have plans to throw thermo's back on but it will be some form of el factory thermo's.

Yay, acceptance! Amen cubes

Dammit, have 6:30am start, but I have this notion of controlling water temp accurately and quickly to use as another factor you could control, stuck in my head- argh.

I know Bemma and others have been doing it for a while on the specy'r models. Surely just a stepper motor on the stock thermostate or a custom stepper’d valve wouldn’t be hard. Do that multi head coolant bleed setup thingo which is popular of late... you could spend many a weekend tweaking.. if only the time and money *sigh*

- M

I have to admit I reckon thermos are the shiznet even though everyone says that they aren't worth it.

I hate the blowing noise the stocker makers, especially in the morning!

I haven't had a fan shroud for 3 months now and with the new radiator I've never seen it go above 82 degrees (still with fan though) even when driving for an hour with the Air con on. I also used to see the oil temp go up a little with the Air con on, but not now. Yay for biggins radiators.

So, I reckon it's only a matter of time before my stock fan totally accidentally and mysteriously breaks and I have to put a big thermo on.

REV210

As you are MR "Lower your rotational mass" on SAU, have you done this mod?

How did you go with engine cooling?

Did the fan come on and off and sap engine power at all?

Tell me your results!

BASS OUT

I cant believe you think your going to get an increase in power from the lower rotational inertia just by removing the mechanical fan.

The rotational inertia would equate to maybe a couple hundred Watts, not kW.

electric fans are better than mechanical purely from a control perspective. They flow less, but transfer the energy required from the crank to the alternator.

Its not a power gaining mod. More an engine saving one!

Think of it this way, at start stop traffic engine speed is slow. Fan speed is proportional to engine speed (hence so is flow, so long as cavitation isnt present). Electric fans arent related to engine speed, rather engine temp.

Edited by AndrewD

Well I still reckon some bored young aspiring mech / elec uni eng, needs to rig an electrical water pump, thermo and some form of PIC. Have some fun playing around with cooling, assuming both units down mind less the 12v

Davies Craig have just released a variable speed controller which allows the operator to select the heat that he wants to water to be at. From 75 degrees up to 105 degrees.

REV210

As you are MR "Lower your rotational mass" on SAU, have you done this mod?

How did you go with engine cooling?

Did the fan come on and off and sap engine power at all?

Tell me your results!

BASS OUT

No actually I am MADAM " Lower your rotational mass" as I am into drag. :(

Yep did the mod a few times to different cars.

The engine goes well with cooling as I retain the fan shroud and use an appropriate size/ cfm fan.

The fan is normally 'on' in the low speed and stand still situations and off as the car is moving at speed.

The 'at speed' part is what the performance angle is aimed at, particularly as the belt pulley drive horsepower losses grow as engine speed and load does. It's when the hammer is down that you like to have the benifit of a redundant fan being driven.

Never really 'measured' the results as I thought them obvious but, I'm sure the might be a test somewhere if googled for.

Most factory skylines fan shrouds will accept the very large 16 inch davies craig fan with a little cutting to size.

Air guides for both the intercooler and radiator are worth chucking in too if you have the inclination for extra efficiency. Some foam can be used if your not a welding type.

AndrewD,

Rotational intertia doesn't equal horsepower to clear that up.

The weight of the factory fan gone helps improve the engine accelleration a small amount, combined with other pulleys made of lighter material it all adds up to help more.

The weight of the fan on the end of the water pump pulley increases the load on the belt, which increases the fictional power losses.

The benifits you mention seem quite valid by the way.

The reliable nature of the pulley fan has it over the electric fans however. If any part of the electric circuit goes down you have no fan, for the pulley fan to fail the water pump pulley has to fall off. For this reason an electric fan has to be done right with the fail safe fuses and relays and spares of these in the car at all times perhaps with a warning light for good measure.

The altenator doesn't kick in tho to keep up with the current draw tho does it? I though that it just span at the same speed always spitting out the same power...

But what is an extra $90 for a ground stabalizer to help the electic system keep up...

no it doesn't but when you load up the alternator, the engine comp often loads up the engine a bit as the alternator needs to spin a little faster to compensate.

You can feel it sometimes and if you turn on the high beams you can often watch the revs rise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...