Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

would like to know if any one on here has used a barrel(water to air)type intercooler on a series2 and if so what are the benifits/drawbacks as opposed to using the standard type FMIC where you have to butcher the front bar etc to fit it?

as i would like to fit a cooler but also want to keep it as discreet as possible.

i am a newbie at this whole turbo car thing so please feel free to pass on any knowledge in these matters.

oxford

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106261-barrel-type-intercoolers-vs-fmics/
Share on other sites

yeah i've thought about this- might escape quite a few defects, dont think alot of cops would spot what they were (although a big polished round thing would still look like a modified part lol). Im interested to know the same.

they're a little less efficient than air to air intercoolers, becasue you're transferring energy from air to water, then from water to air. regular intercoolers don't have that middle step. i looked into it for a while, they're comparatively priced, but there's still that efficiency drawback

From what ive read

Water is actually a far superior medium in comparison to air for transfering temperature, a good example is placing a warm beer in the fridge and a warm beer in a bucket of water with ice...

Needless to say the beer in the ice water chills dastically quicker than the one in the fridge..

The problem is ambient air is usually below 40 degrees consistantly, no cooling required however the water temp in a water to air system can get above this if your system does not have enough water or the radiator to cool the water is under sized.

Thats why Air to air coolers are generally so much larger as they require a greater surface area to transfer the heat.

up side is usually less piping so less lag

down side is that they are more complicated to set up, they need there own water supply, pump and radiator.

Sitting at traffic lights without a thermo fan a water to air system will probably suffer greater heat soak than an equiveliant air to air system

Hope this helps

Once you think of the weight of the water, the losses of effciency (water is a great insulator,therefore that extra step really hurts it) its not really worth it.

air-air is just so much easier too. If you want to improve the air-air, just spray something on it that sucks a LOT of heat out like alchohol or metho or something that evaporates REALLY quick (more then water that it)

these are all good comments thanks guys but i still would like to know if any one has fitted a fmic to a series 2 and if so was it an easy fit? what model car do they closely match for piping etc if any? and how much of the reinforcing in front bar do ya need to remove to fit it in etc? deepending on the dimensions of the cooler to get etc if buying a generic off the shelf item? all these questions are/will be important to know before i go ahead so any help would be much appreciated.

cheers .

oxford

heres some pics of the bumper as stock (number plate area is solid plastic), and some of the cooler without bumper on (gtr cooler) and some with the bumper on once i chopped it.

its hardly noticable with the front bumper on and standing up unless u really look for it.

i also chopped the front bumper support bar to allow more air to the cooler.

102_0255.jpg

stagchoppedbar.jpg

103_0355.jpg

101_0192.jpg

102_0285.jpg

102_0284.jpg

cheers

Brad

Take a look at brad's setup. If you painted it black then you wouldn't even notice it at all. Even how it is in the pics with the bar on you can't even see the silicon hose joiners. I would go this way. There was a thread on here where people posted up info on fmic they fitted. You can purchase a lot of kits where the drivers side tank faces back toward the passenger side so you can easily join the pipes back up to the factory pipes.

Oops, I ment air actually, as air is a good insulator.

But on another note, lets get into some physics.

The specific heat capacity of air is 1005 J/Kg K and of water is 4184 J/Kg K. So that means that for each gram of water, compared to a gram of air, you need MORE energy to change its temperature. Doesnt that mean that mean that water is an even better insulator then air?

I would think they use it in cooling systems because its readily available, plus for a given mass of water compared to most other things can hold a LOT of energy.

Also, metals have SHC's around 900 and below. All the way down to 200 for mercury.

I think you've gotten confused, you should be using thermal conductivity, not specific heat capacity.

the thermal conductivity of water is 0.56W/m.K, where as that of air is 0.0025W/m.K

Just noting that it's a rate, not a quantity

Take a look at brad's setup. If you painted it black then you wouldn't even notice it at all. Even how it is in the pics with the bar on you can't even see the silicon hose joiners. I would go this way. There was a thread on here where people posted up info on fmic they fitted. You can purchase a lot of kits where the drivers side tank faces back toward the passenger side so you can easily join the pipes back up to the factory pipes.

thanks mr rs4.

i spose this would look ok in black cos i wanna try and keep it as neat/discreet as i can, the car already gets a lot of attention cos it is the only one in my area, and i have never seen another one on the road yet either, when it comes to hooking up to the std piping how well does it flow? and are the fronts of series 2 the same as series one? seems that all you guys have series one cars is all?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...