Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I had a full 3" exhaust fitted today on an otherwise stock GTT.

BATMBL 3"split dump and front + big bodied stainless steel cat + cannon cat back with midmuffler/resonator.

First impression, loud! haha power wise, didnt feel that much of a difference, a tiny bit better but not like a 20-30rwkw gain. Boost increased by roughly 2psi from about 5000rpm onwards.

Anyways, I hadnt chucked my car on the dyno before so decided to give it a go. I know the R34 manual GTTs make roughly 140-150rwkw in stock form.

Put mine one, 163.5rwkw. Quite disappointing actually. I wanted to crack the 170 mark, I know all dynos etc are different etc etc. I thought my car woulda made 150rwkw stock, plus another 25 at least from the exhaust.

Here is the dyno sheet, what do you guys rekon?

upload.jpg

Tuner recommended getting a FMIC as inlet temps were getting high.

Else he said everything is running fine (which is probably the best news).

Too much expectation with the exhaust, everyone was telling me how it would make a huge huge difference, hahaha ah well, the saga continues.

Thanks all!

Edited by nuffsaid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/106606-dyno-sheet-for-r34-scrutineering/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

163kw @ 25 PSI_g?

wat the hell?

please explain?

the power graph look nearly perfect?

very linear power.

U got POD?

i believe POD makes a different.

did u feel diferent with BATML dump?

i gona be instal BATML split dump in the weekend, and wana throw it onto dyno, c how much am geting,

interesting~!~

Oh so I am making 10psi with this setup? Fair enough then, no need for EBC or boost tap then haha

I know its a linear curve and all which is good for a stockish car. I dont have a pod, just a apexi panel filter. And I dont think Im making 25psi, I believe its 10? Correct me if I am wrong hahah And with regards to BATMBLs pipes, doesnt seem like it made much of a difference, maybe its just my setup but the 16rwkw claim for the dump pipe alone just doesnt add up with my sums.

I expected:

10-15 from the split dump

maybe 5-10 for the cat

and another 5-10 for the cat back.

So worst case should be a 20rwkw gain, best case, 30ish??

Edited by nuffsaid

Yeah I wanted at least 20rwkw, goes to show that maybe an exhaust isnt what its all cracked up to be, I now find it hard how CES can claim to make 45rwkw on a S15 full exhaust.

No bleed valve no nothing, pretty much stock except for exhaust and apexi panel filter.

True, I should dynoed before, maybe the car wouldve only made 140kw, make this a gain of 23. The R34 HPI project car made 148 stock. Satanic's website mentions a R34 with only a catback and panel filter making 175! hahah ouch

Yeah I wanted at least 20rwkw, goes to show that maybe an exhaust isnt what its all cracked up to be, I now find it hard how CES can claim to make 45rwkw on a S15 full exhaust.

No bleed valve no nothing, pretty much stock except for exhaust and apexi panel filter.

True, I should dynoed before, maybe the car wouldve only made 140kw, make this a gain of 23. The R34 HPI project car made 148 stock. Satanic's website mentions a R34 with only a catback and panel filter making 175! hahah ouch

i dont think the exhaust would make 25 kw extra.. maybe 10. That S15 might make a 45 kw gain on a full mod setup, turbo, ecu and supporting mods.

i fink the BATML claimed the new split dump front pipe and the new Hi-flow CAT with stainless steel inside claim 27kw increase for R32,

i am gona instal it in the weekend, on my r33

would be interesting to see wats the increase goin to be,

but i wont be dyno as stock, cos too much hassle, already got KnN and 3" from hks cat back.

got r34 intercooler and bleedvale on its way.

Either this one is a little low or my one is a little high... but my first dyno run was when the car was dead stock. Pulled 156rwkw which mind you is from an auto.

Stock manual should get what you are getting if not a bit more... on that same day there was a stock manual who pull about 165rwkw from memory.

Just my opinion don't mind me...

Gorgasm: from what it says here http://www.cesracing.com.au/Products/ it looks like 45rwkw on a stock S15 except for their full exhaust and pod filter. Maybe they respond better to exhaust mods coz perhaps their stock piping is very restrictive, and the R34 not as much. Maybe they didnt mention the other mods

Elushun: its a manual

Satanic: really? coz I saw a HPI DVD with a stock manual GTT, pulled 148rwkw.

ZXFIRE: Yeah the claims were for a R32, but seeing as a R34 has more power, I wouldve though that the gain would be more if anything. note: I have the split dump and that huge cat that flows at 706cfm.

Edited by nuffsaid

Well the dyno reading that I got (156rwkw) was at a dyno day using a Dyno Dynamics dyno in Shootout mode.

As I said, I don't know whether your reading is a little sad or my one is a little happy.

Everyone else on the day seemed to get quite accurate readings though. Both Links and d00dz were also at this and can probably confirm :D

Whose dyno was that Stan?

There is definitely enough variation in dyno readings to account for what you got there. I got 162rwkw from full exhaust, panel filter and more boost. That's with big name parts too.

Putting a fmic on will on decrease response, you will not get any more power from it. I would go so far as to say that if I had my time again I wouldn't have put a front mount on until I upgraded the turbo. The r34 smic is bigger than the r33 one.

I don't think there is anything wrong with what you've got there unless that wierdness at the top there is not dyno operator induced.

It was the OCAU dyno day out at Dumar Automotive? From memory it was out near Berowra...

I'm still in touch with a few other guys from the day (TT Supra and Ford XR6 Turbo) and they are both getting consistent readings.

I'm confused now... I thought 156rwkw was quite good for a stock car :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...