Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Any one seen/purchased these rims?

http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....roducts_id=4428

They look to be alright, very similar to the nismo ones (and at an affordable price) which im looking for. Looks to be a set offset, so will the +30 17x9" for the front and +15 17x9.5" for the rear fit a r34?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107019-nismo-lm-gt4-rims/
Share on other sites

its probably as good as im going to get on my car budget, they dont look too different from the lm's which i will never be able to afford. The offset mentioned on the site, do you think they should fit the skyline?

thanks for the replies; i guess 17x9 (all round) should do the trick then. Will probably have to lower the car at the same time also....so it wont look too goofy.

Edited by RyanN

17x9 +30 offset for the fronts you will most likely run into problems when u lower it. ideally you would want 17x8 in the front and 17x9 in the rears with a +30ish offset. 17x9.5 +15 for the rears will stick out like dogs balls and will rub ur guards when you try lowering ur car.

U might wanna chk these out as well look much better IMO

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...pic=117430&st=0

17x9 +30 offset for the fronts you will most likely run into problems when u lower it. ideally you would want 17x8 in the front and 17x9 in the rears with a +30ish offset. 17x9.5 +15 for the rears will stick out like dogs balls and will rub ur guards when you try lowering ur car.

U might wanna chk these out as well look much better IMO

http://www.nissansilvia.com/forums/index.p...pic=117430&st=0

would the different tyre widths screw with the HICAS ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...