Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Telstra Boradband here, weve had foxtel for 13 years, broadband for a long time, home phone and 1 mobile. We recently upgraded 50gig to 200gig per month, and SAVED $20 per month. So dad got an extra foxtel box for the family room :)

Yeah Telstra have some nice deals going on at the moment plus their cable internet service is extremely reliable with great speeds. Hopefully we will get the speed upgrade to 100Mbps that was in the pipeline.

Hmm, I agree to some extent, but already many companies are offering uncapped internet for around the $150 a month mark when bundled with home phone and mobile. There is no other country in the world that I know of that caps there internet (not for the past 5 years or so anyways). We are WAAAAAAAAAAAY behind. It will become essencially free, or to the point that its so cheap that it might as well be uncapped. We are not far off it. We are actually getting limited by speed more so then download limit with caps these days.

There are a few ISPs in Australia offering unlimited downloads, but typically only on limited exchanges. These ISPs also typically have a lower quality of network, lower-quality service/support, and over-subscribe their service to the hilt - to try and cut the costs.

As for the rest of the world - not sure if you don't read the IT news websites or what ... lots of places around the globe are implementing capped internet.

Comcast in the US with a 250GB cap, back in 2008:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/its_...h_bandwidth_cap

ATT in the US followed up with their own bandwidth caps:

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/att_...b_bandwidth_cap

http://www.dailytech.com/ATT+Experiments+w...rticle13355.htm

TimeWarner 40GB for $50 bandwidth caps:

http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/06...caps-arrive.ars

These are just three I can find quickly on the web.

I'm not saying bandwidth caps are a good thing - I don't particularly agree with them. But users are downloading more and more, and right now with the structure of the internet - particularly in Australia - those bits of data cost real money. The ISPs do typically still get charged on a per/gb download fee for their users, and then they have to cover the costs of their own network, infrastructure, support services, etc, etc. The more bandwidth they're pushing through their network, the bigger and more capable routers they need etc. What worked 6-12 months ago may not scale up to the same capacity today. Margins in the ISP world are typically small - it's a business that I'm glad to be out of these days.

I don't think internet will ever be free. What we'll probably find is a convergence between our various services - phone, media/entertainment (music/TV) & internet, offered under perhaps an access fee and a monthly content fee (or perhaps a per-download fee for the content), which is then stored locally (likely DRMd). Who knows how far away that is down the track though, 5 years? 10?

We're a media and entertainment hungry society - I can imagine a situation where we'll end up with is agreements between the content/media providers content distribution networks and the end-users ISPs to essentially provide our media content for free and the rest of our internet access at a nominal rate - download limits won't mean much then because most of our content will be via local CDN nodes. We may end up probably have to pay the content/media providers a monthly access fee for the service. Think ABC iView that is offered un-metered to many ISPs. The whole face of the internet and how we get our content is changing dramatically - some companies are moving with the times and recognising how things are changing, others are falling behind.

Yeah Telstra have some nice deals going on at the moment plus their cable internet service is extremely reliable with great speeds. Hopefully we will get the speed upgrade to 100Mbps that was in the pipeline.

yeah not wrong then i can even quicker not use my 50gb :)

pity they don't upgrade the pipe on foxtel on demand i tried to download a movie but it seemed a bit slow

For those Starcraft II fans, I have just finished the game for the 2nd time (first on Normal, then on Hard) - F$#k me some of the Hard missions are Hard (yeah yeah, I know how stupid that sounds) - especially if you are trying to get the extra achievements (some of them are near impossible trying to get the extra achievements as well). I am contemplating doing it on Brutal, but don't know if I have the fortitude to go through it again. Might leave it a few weeks and work on some of the league achievements instead. How many points do you guys have now? I have 2,000 exactly.

For those Starcraft II fans, I have just finished the game for the 2nd time (first on Normal, then on Hard) - F$#k me some of the Hard missions are Hard (yeah yeah, I know how stupid that sounds) - especially if you are trying to get the extra achievements (some of them are near impossible trying to get the extra achievements as well). I am contemplating doing it on Brutal, but don't know if I have the fortitude to go through it again. Might leave it a few weeks and work on some of the league achievements instead. How many points do you guys have now? I have 2,000 exactly.

Yeah it's a bitch on hard. All In was a particular nightmare

Yep, finished it just now so it is very fresh in my mind. Took about 3.5 hours, due to save games and what not. Especially hard since I was trying to get the ALL IN achievement and only used the Artifact once right near the end.

Can't even imagine how hard it is going to be on Brutal. At least I will be able to use the Artifact on that one though, since the achievement is done.

  • 2 weeks later...

when looking for a SSD what should one look for

trying to keep it under $200 as its for a Gamer Build im quoting

>>OCZ List Here<<

i was thinking this as its not over the top but will get better performance compared with a platter HDD

>>OCZ 60gb <<

come to look @ it the Vertex 2 would probably be better

>> OCZ 60gb Vertex2<<

Yep the Vertex 2 isn't bad. I have the similar Falcon 2 in my rig. Big problem is for any gamers is that 60Gb is WAY too small to keep your Win and games on (my Steam directory alone is 80Gb), so you end up putting your games directory on a 2nd drive which all but 100% negates any speed benefit of an SSD. TBH my preference in hindsight would be to raid 3 x 1Tb drives together (for similar money of 1 x 60Gb SSD), and have a 4th 2Tb drive for all the important docs/data whatever in case the array ever fails. Even better you can keep everything - your Win, games and data on the array and backup any important data to the 4th drive and you are set.

yeah i was well ahead of you Andrew

this is drive number 2, now i know green aren't the sought after drive but i don't think it should matter too much but i may consult with the guy as its a flight sim X machine

>>WD green 1.5tb 300mb/s<<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...