Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have to say, I've never driven mine until the fuel light comes on. I usually fuel up when it gets to a quarter tank or just below.

Here's a few figures I've kept:

49.98litres, 341.9kms, 14.62l/100kms

46.40litres, 333.3kms, 13.92l/100kms

48.04litres, 332.9kms, 14.43l/100kms

47.22litres, 304.0kms, 15.53l/100kms

44.31litres, 304.6kms, 14.55l/100kms

And on a trip to Canberra late last year:

42.54litres, 311.4kms, 13.6l/100kms heading down

48.75litres, 367.7kms, 13.2l/100kms heading home (driving less conservatively, mind you!)

So a rough average since I bought the car in October is around 14.6l/100kms. But I'm sure mine is running typically rich, just like a majority of basically standard Skylines and Stageas out there...

+

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I check the economy on each tank fill and I have tried every brand of 98 ron fuel, makes no difference. Gunna try some 100 ron next week.

I get about 450 - 480kms out of a full tank. About 12.5L/100Km. That's in Canberra with a lot of open roads.

I've been testing the Shell Unleaded 95, Optimax (98) and the new Optimax Extreme (100). I have actually found the Unleaded 95 offers the best fuel economy, about an extra 20-30 kms per tank.

The Optimax Extreme did very little in terms of fuel consumption, but it feels better in the higher rev range (especially on the redline). It actually feels like a should be able to keep revving it out to about 8500rpm.

I've also found the Caltex fuel doesn't agree with the engine. I only get between 360 - 380kms out of a tank - about 16L/100Km.

I'm yet to try the BP fuels.

I've been testing the Shell Unleaded 95, Optimax (98) and the new Optimax Extreme (100). I have actually found the Unleaded 95 offers the best fuel economy, about an extra 20-30 kms per tank.

Interesting - it stills goes ok on the 95 if you put your foot down a bit??

I've also found the Caltex fuel doesn't agree with the engine. I only get between 360 - 380kms out of a tank - about 16L/100Km.

Strong advice after lots of nissans - NEVER put anything except the shell or BP fuel in them! :/

I've update my starting post to summarise what everyone has said.

Ian

Interesting thing about higher octane vs fuel economy.

Recently the AA here in NZ did a real world driving test with a Nissan Maxima. They drove as real people would, not as someone trying to conserve fuel. They drove around some of the roads in the North Island one way using BP 96, and returned the same route using BP 98.

They found that using 98 gave them better economy, but it still worked out more expensive (not by much ) to run on 98.

I generally run my Stagea on BP 98, it feels like the wagon runs smoother and is less hesitant. It doesn't seem to make any difference to fuel economy when I compared it to 96.

Well Ladies & Gentlemen, lend me your ears;

I've just come back from a tour of NSW with the misses & kids plus all of their shit from Toowoomba to Aulbury, to Canberra, to Sydney, to Coffs Harbour, & lastly home to Toowoomba. Most of time i did about 85% highway driving (around 110-120km/h, 150 around trucks) & 15% city. On average I'd get 400-450km per tank (around 58L) on premium unleaded.

BUT in Canberra i filled up with premium E10 from United petrolium (they call it Boost 98 & it was only 3c more than regular unleaded). From this stuff i got 550km out of the tank going from canberra to sydeny! :D

I was pritty stoked with it, so i tried it again in sydney & got the same 100km extra out of a tank. The car ran smoothly with no hesitations or pinging.

I would recommend it to anyone, just to try it out!

You cant drive a dream and not pay the price.

Sometimes the price of happyness is simply worth it.... I know it is for me :O

Agreed :O

Should the fuel consumption improve greatly once I install the Jaycar gear? Which I have sitting on my table :) Too lazy to build it

SK reported improvements of around 1L/100 after the DFA was installed.

I am certain it would make a massive difference. I think I might give the DFA a quick tune for the time being after I install the turbo, until I can afford to get the cams/unichip done. At least I will get a bit more power and better economy until I can afford it.

DAMH

must be sumthin bout the way i drive.

i filled up on wednesday mornin (optimax)

and i got 270k's out of that tank (highway drivin and round town)

i feel bad considering the k's you guys get out of a tank

DAMH

must be sumthin bout the way i drive.

i filled up on wednesday mornin (optimax)

and i got 270k's out of that tank (highway drivin and round town)

i feel bad considering the k's you guys get out of a tank

Your not alone! :whistling:

on trips to both brisbane and Melbourne I have seen 10.5 consistently (including coming out of bris and up over the ranges, where I had a bit of a play), better that the in laws XR6 AU, I am still pretty sure I can get it under 10 too, but I would have to fill up at the start of a really flat/ downhill long highway section (need to be long to make up for pulling out of servo) and then get another servo at the end of that :), Normal cruising speed is 10 over on the speedo (which reads about 2-3% over)

Strong advice after lots of nissans - NEVER put anything except the shell or BP fuel in them! :rolleyes:

Ian

Why is that Ian? I never use Shell (only like 96ron here in Adelaide for premium unleaded), and generally fill up with Mobile 8000 (98ron) rather than BP Ultimate (98ron).

I find the mobile to be absolutely fine, and my car is tuned for that fuel..........

Why is that Ian? I never use Shell (only like 96ron here in Adelaide for premium unleaded), and generally fill up with Mobile 8000 (98ron) rather than BP Ultimate (98ron).

I find the mobile to be absolutely fine, and my car is tuned for that fuel..........

It could have improved, but years ago I tried all of them in a range of nissan cars and had various problems. Mobile was the best by a long way (ie no problems, just not as good as shell or BP), but all the 'independant' ones were a real pain. One car I had to drain the petrol out of the tank (engine miss firing etc etc..) after filling it up...

Ian

Just went down to Aireys Inlet for the weekend with the Mrs. Drove heaps around the GOR/mountains there

Here are some figures

From east side Melbourne to Angelsea, so city/hwy, 16.5L for 155km = 10.64 L/100km

Drive around the GOR, up and down and side to side...not too slowly 45L for 360km = 12.5 L/100km

More GOR/Highway/City 27L for 230km = 11.73 L/100km

Now, for the surprize. After my turbo install wednesday night, I forgot to hook up my O2 sensor... so that was all with O2 sensor UNPLUGGED. HMMMMM

Just went down to Aireys Inlet for the weekend with the Mrs. Drove heaps around the GOR/mountains there

Here are some figures

From east side Melbourne to Angelsea, so city/hwy, 16.5L for 155km = 10.64 L/100km

Drive around the GOR, up and down and side to side...not too slowly 45L for 360km = 12.5 L/100km

More GOR/Highway/City 27L for 230km = 11.73 L/100km

Now, for the surprize. After my turbo install wednesday night, I forgot to hook up my O2 sensor... so that was all with O2 sensor UNPLUGGED. HMMMMM

oooo :)

I know this doesnt really count, but just racked up ~450 kms on my works new Holden Crewman (I know, I know) anyway I got ~450kms out of the tank (~50L I think...?) on the dash it said 12.3L/100kms.

Just thought I'd give everyone some comparison. About 400kms of that was highway driving too, with the cruise control on......

God I hate crewmans, they suck, but this is nor the time nor the place to winge about them :dry:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...